Dingemans Siem A, Birnie Merel F N, Backes Manouk, de Jong Vincent M, Luitse Jan S, Goslings J Carel, Schepers Tim
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Trauma Unit, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands.
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):747-753. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3781-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
Infectious complications following lower extremity fracture surgery are a major concern and account for a substantial socio-economic burden to society. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of a new portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in patients undergoing major foot ankle surgery.
Patients undergoing major foot ankle fracture surgery at a single level 1 trauma centre were eligible for this prospective case series. Patient characteristics were collected, as were fracture and surgical characteristics. Primary outcome was surgical site infection within 30 days as classified by the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patients in the prospective cohort were case-matched with a historical cohort from the same institution.
Sixty patients were included. In seven patients, the NPWT failed and treatment was ceased. Mean age was 44 years and 85% was ASA 1; 43% of the patients were actively smoking. Indications for surgery were midfoot, calcaneal, talar, and ankle fractures. In 53 patients, four (7.5%) surgical site infections occurred, two superficial (3.3%) and two (3.3%) deep infections. For 47 patients, a match was available. The incidence of surgical site infection did not statistically significantly differ between the prospective cohort and retrospective matched cohort (4.3 versus 14.9%, p = 0.29, respectively). This was also the case when looking at superficial and deep surgical site infections separately (0 versus 8.5%, p = 0.08, and 4.3 versus 6.4%, respectively).
We have observed surgical site infections in 7.5% of the patients with the use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy. The incidence of surgical site infections was not statistically significantly lower compared to a matched historical cohort.
下肢骨折手术后的感染并发症是一个主要问题,给社会带来了巨大的社会经济负担。本试点研究的目的是调查一种新型便携式一次性负压伤口治疗设备在接受足踝大手术患者中的可行性。
在一家一级创伤中心接受足踝骨折大手术的患者符合本前瞻性病例系列研究的条件。收集了患者特征以及骨折和手术特征。主要结局是根据疾病控制与预防中心的标准分类的30天内手术部位感染。前瞻性队列中的患者与来自同一机构的历史队列进行病例匹配。
纳入60例患者。7例患者的负压伤口治疗失败,治疗终止。平均年龄为44岁,85%为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1级;43%的患者目前仍在吸烟。手术指征为中足、跟骨、距骨和踝关节骨折。53例患者中发生了4例(7.5%)手术部位感染,2例表浅感染(3.3%)和2例(3.3%)深部感染。47例患者有匹配对象。前瞻性队列和回顾性匹配队列之间手术部位感染的发生率无统计学显著差异(分别为4.3%和14.9%,p = 0.29)。分别观察表浅和深部手术部位感染时也是如此(分别为0%和8.5%,p = 0.08,以及4.3%和6.4%)。
我们观察到在使用预防性负压伤口治疗的患者中,7.5%发生了手术部位感染。与匹配的历史队列相比,手术部位感染的发生率在统计学上没有显著降低。