Gupta S, Rout G, Patel A H, Mahanta M, Kalra N, Sahu P, Sethia R, Agarwal A, Ranjan G, Kedia S, Acharya S K, Nayak B
Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jul;25(7):771-778. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12870. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are now the standard of care for the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Branded DAAs are associated with high sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-completion of therapy (SVR12), but are costly. We aimed to assess the efficacy of generic oral DAAs in a real-life clinical scenario. Consecutive patients with known HCV infection who were treated with generic-oral DAA regimens (May 2015 to January 2017) were included. Demographic details, prior therapy and SVR12 were documented. Four hundred and ninety patients (mean age: 38.9 ± 12.7 years) were treated with generic DAAs in the study time period. Their clinical presentations included chronic hepatitis (CHC) in 339 (69.2%) of cases, compensated cirrhosis in 120 (24.48%) cases and decompensated cirrhosis in 31 (6.32%) cases. Genotype 3 was most common (n = 372, 75.9%) followed by genotype 1 (n = 97, 19.8%). Treatment naïve and treatment-experienced (defined as having previous treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin) were 432 (88.2%) and 58 (11.8%), respectively. Generic DAA treatment regimens included sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin (n = 175), daclatasvir alone (n = 149), ribavirin and peginterferon (n = 80), ledipasvir alone (n = 43), daclatasvir and ribavirin (n = 37), and ledipasvir and ribavirin (n = 6). Overall SVR12 was 95.9% (470/490) for all treatment regimens. SVR12 for treatment naïve and experienced patients was 97.0% (419/432) and 87.9% (51/58), respectively, P = .005. High SVR12 was observed with various regimens, irrespective of genotype and underlying liver disease status. There were no differences in SVR12 with 12 or 24 weeks therapy. No major adverse event occurred requiring treatment stoppage. Generic oral DAAs are associated with high SVR rates in patients with HCV infection in a real-life clinical scenario.
新型直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)现已成为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染治疗的标准疗法。品牌DAA药物在治疗结束12周时具有较高的持续病毒学应答率(SVR12),但成本高昂。我们旨在评估仿制药口服DAAs在实际临床场景中的疗效。纳入了2015年5月至2017年1月期间接受仿制药口服DAA方案治疗的已知HCV感染的连续患者。记录了人口统计学细节、既往治疗情况和SVR12。在研究期间,490例患者(平均年龄:38.9±12.7岁)接受了仿制药DAAs治疗。他们的临床表现包括339例(69.2%)慢性肝炎(CHC)、120例(24.48%)代偿期肝硬化和31例(6.32%)失代偿期肝硬化。基因型3最为常见(n = 372,75.9%),其次是基因型1(n = 97,19.8%)。初治患者和经治患者(定义为既往接受过聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗)分别为432例(88.2%)和58例(11.8%)。仿制药DAA治疗方案包括索磷布韦联合利巴韦林(n = 175)、单独使用达拉他韦(n = 149)、利巴韦林和聚乙二醇干扰素(n = 80)、单独使用来迪派韦(n = 43)、达拉他韦和利巴韦林(n = 37)以及来迪派韦和利巴韦林(n = 6)。所有治疗方案的总体SVR12为95.9%(470/490)。初治患者和经治患者的SVR12分别为97.0%(419/432)和87.9%(51/58),P = 0.005。无论基因型和潜在肝病状态如何,各种治疗方案均观察到较高的SVR12。12周或24周治疗的SVR12无差异。未发生需要停药的重大不良事件。在实际临床场景中,仿制药口服DAAs与HCV感染患者的高SVR率相关。