文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

一项荟萃分析研究了开放式手术治疗与微创手术治疗对女性宫颈癌患者伤口感染的影响。

A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.

机构信息

Obstetrics Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14535. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14535. Epub 2024 Jan 2.


DOI:10.1111/iwj.14535
PMID:38169097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10961045/
Abstract

A meta-analysis study was executed to measure the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgical management (OSM) on wound infection (WI) in female's cervical cancer (CC). A comprehensive literature study till February 2023 was applied and 1675 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 41 chosen investigations enclosed 10 204 females with CC and were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 4294 of them were utilizing MIS, and 5910 were utilizing OSM. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to compute the value of the effect of MIS and OSM on WI in female's CC and by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. The MIS had significantly lower WI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) with no heterogeneity (I = 0%) and postoperative aggregate complications (PACs) (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.64, p < 0.001) in females with CC and compared OSM. However, MIS compared with OSM in females with CC and had no significant difference in pelvic infection and abscess (PIA) (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31-1.16, p = 0.13). The MIS had significantly lower WI, and PACs, though, had no significant difference in PIA in females with CC and compared with OSM. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.

摘要

一项荟萃分析研究旨在衡量微创手术(MIS)和开放式手术管理(OSM)对女性宫颈癌(CC)中伤口感染(WI)的影响。该研究进行了全面的文献综述,截止到 2023 年 2 月,共回顾了 1675 项相关研究。在纳入的 41 项研究中,共有 10204 名女性患有 CC,在研究起点,4294 名女性接受了 MIS,5910 名女性接受了 OSM。采用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来计算 MIS 和 OSM 对女性 CC 中 WI 的影响,采用二项式方法和固定或随机模型。MIS 与 OSM 相比,WI 发生率显著降低(OR,0.23;95%CI,0.15-0.35,p<0.001),且异质性低(I=0%),术后总并发症(PACs)发生率也较低(OR,0.49;95%CI,0.37-0.64,p<0.001)。然而,MIS 与 OSM 相比,女性 CC 中盆腔感染和脓肿(PIA)发生率差异无统计学意义(OR,0.59;95%CI,0.31-1.16,p=0.13)。MIS 与 OSM 相比,WI 和 PACs 发生率较低,但 PIA 发生率差异无统计学意义。然而,由于部分纳入荟萃分析的研究样本量较小,在处理其结果时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/4f790a1d9f84/IWJ-21-e14535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/6581cac5f104/IWJ-21-e14535-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/23492331265b/IWJ-21-e14535-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ddb10e62d52e/IWJ-21-e14535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ab8976fbd7d6/IWJ-21-e14535-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/851bb0b24ddd/IWJ-21-e14535-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/4f790a1d9f84/IWJ-21-e14535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/6581cac5f104/IWJ-21-e14535-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/23492331265b/IWJ-21-e14535-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ddb10e62d52e/IWJ-21-e14535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ab8976fbd7d6/IWJ-21-e14535-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/851bb0b24ddd/IWJ-21-e14535-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.

Int Wound J. 2024-4

[2]
A meta-analysis comparing open and minimally invasive cervical tumor surgery wound infection and postoperative complications.

BMC Surg. 2024-12-23

[3]
Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-4

[4]
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2021

[5]
The outcome of sutured wounds compared with tissue adhesive for paediatric wound closure: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-10

[6]
Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-11

[7]
Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-11

[8]
A meta-analysis evaluating wound infections and other complications following distal versus complete gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Int Wound J. 2024-4

[9]
Effect of adjunctive prophylactic macrolides used at the caesarean section on endometritis and surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-10

[10]
Effect of endoscopic loop ties in acute appendicitis on wound infection rate: A meta-analysis.

Int Wound J. 2023-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
RETRACTION: A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Open Surgical Therapy versus Minimally Invasive Surgery on Wound Infection in Females With Cervical Cancer.

Int Wound J. 2025-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gynecol Oncol. 2022-7

[2]
Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023-1

[3]
Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022-3

[4]
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2021

[5]
Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021-8

[6]
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021-3

[7]
Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study.

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021-2

[8]
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine, antimalarial, age and gender relation to COVID-19 spread and mortality.

Vaccine. 2020-7-3

[9]
First-time handling of different inhalers by chronic obstructive lung disease patients.

Exp Lung Res. 2020-9

[10]
Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.

Gynecol Oncol. 2020-1-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索