• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项荟萃分析研究了开放式手术治疗与微创手术治疗对女性宫颈癌患者伤口感染的影响。

A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.

机构信息

Obstetrics Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14535. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14535. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14535
PMID:38169097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10961045/
Abstract

A meta-analysis study was executed to measure the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgical management (OSM) on wound infection (WI) in female's cervical cancer (CC). A comprehensive literature study till February 2023 was applied and 1675 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 41 chosen investigations enclosed 10 204 females with CC and were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 4294 of them were utilizing MIS, and 5910 were utilizing OSM. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to compute the value of the effect of MIS and OSM on WI in female's CC and by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. The MIS had significantly lower WI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15-0.35, p < 0.001) with no heterogeneity (I = 0%) and postoperative aggregate complications (PACs) (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.64, p < 0.001) in females with CC and compared OSM. However, MIS compared with OSM in females with CC and had no significant difference in pelvic infection and abscess (PIA) (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31-1.16, p = 0.13). The MIS had significantly lower WI, and PACs, though, had no significant difference in PIA in females with CC and compared with OSM. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.

摘要

一项荟萃分析研究旨在衡量微创手术(MIS)和开放式手术管理(OSM)对女性宫颈癌(CC)中伤口感染(WI)的影响。该研究进行了全面的文献综述,截止到 2023 年 2 月,共回顾了 1675 项相关研究。在纳入的 41 项研究中,共有 10204 名女性患有 CC,在研究起点,4294 名女性接受了 MIS,5910 名女性接受了 OSM。采用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来计算 MIS 和 OSM 对女性 CC 中 WI 的影响,采用二项式方法和固定或随机模型。MIS 与 OSM 相比,WI 发生率显著降低(OR,0.23;95%CI,0.15-0.35,p<0.001),且异质性低(I=0%),术后总并发症(PACs)发生率也较低(OR,0.49;95%CI,0.37-0.64,p<0.001)。然而,MIS 与 OSM 相比,女性 CC 中盆腔感染和脓肿(PIA)发生率差异无统计学意义(OR,0.59;95%CI,0.31-1.16,p=0.13)。MIS 与 OSM 相比,WI 和 PACs 发生率较低,但 PIA 发生率差异无统计学意义。然而,由于部分纳入荟萃分析的研究样本量较小,在处理其结果时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/4f790a1d9f84/IWJ-21-e14535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/6581cac5f104/IWJ-21-e14535-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/23492331265b/IWJ-21-e14535-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ddb10e62d52e/IWJ-21-e14535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ab8976fbd7d6/IWJ-21-e14535-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/851bb0b24ddd/IWJ-21-e14535-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/4f790a1d9f84/IWJ-21-e14535-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/6581cac5f104/IWJ-21-e14535-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/23492331265b/IWJ-21-e14535-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ddb10e62d52e/IWJ-21-e14535-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/ab8976fbd7d6/IWJ-21-e14535-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/851bb0b24ddd/IWJ-21-e14535-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d5/10961045/228186cd0e04/IWJ-21-e14535-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis examining the impact of open surgical therapy versus minimally invasive surgery on wound infection in females with cervical cancer.一项荟萃分析研究了开放式手术治疗与微创手术治疗对女性宫颈癌患者伤口感染的影响。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14535. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14535. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
A meta-analysis comparing open and minimally invasive cervical tumor surgery wound infection and postoperative complications.一项比较开放性与微创性宫颈肿瘤手术伤口感染及术后并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02713-8.
3
Effect of minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy on wound infection and postoperative and intraoperative complications in the management of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.微创外科与剖腹手术治疗宫颈癌的术中及术后并发症和伤口感染的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1061-1071. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13962. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创手术与开放手术治疗早期宫颈癌并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253143. eCollection 2021.
5
The outcome of sutured wounds compared with tissue adhesive for paediatric wound closure: A meta-analysis.缝线缝合与组织粘合剂在儿科伤口闭合中的比较结果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3298-3306. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14210. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis.传统环切术与环扎术的愈合率和伤口问题比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3699-3707. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14262. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
7
Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的伤口感染比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3550-3557. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14228. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
A meta-analysis evaluating wound infections and other complications following distal versus complete gastrectomy for gastric cancer.一项针对远端胃切除术与全胃切除术治疗胃癌后伤口感染及其他并发症的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14516. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14516. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
9
Effect of adjunctive prophylactic macrolides used at the caesarean section on endometritis and surgical site wound infection: A meta-analysis.剖宫产术时预防性使用辅助性大环内酯类药物对子宫内膜炎和手术部位伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3307-3314. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14211. Epub 2023 May 9.
10
Effect of endoscopic loop ties in acute appendicitis on wound infection rate: A meta-analysis.内镜套扎环在急性阑尾炎中对伤口感染率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3048-3056. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14180. Epub 2023 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
RETRACTION: A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Open Surgical Therapy versus Minimally Invasive Surgery on Wound Infection in Females With Cervical Cancer.撤稿声明:一项Meta分析,探讨开放性手术治疗与微创手术对宫颈癌女性伤口感染的影响
Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70573. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70573.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助阴道根治性子宫切除术作为早期宫颈癌微创手术的一种安全选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;166(1):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.根治性子宫切除术不同手术入路的相关结局:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14209. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for treating cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的疗效评估:一项荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):69-82. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.106126. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创手术与开放手术治疗早期宫颈癌并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253143. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.比较肿瘤学结果和主要并发症在腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术和腹部根治性子宫切除术之间为阶段 IB1 宫颈癌与肿瘤大小小于 2 厘米。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):2125-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.238. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):544-555.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.023. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
7
Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study.腹腔镜与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的生存结局比较:一项法国多中心研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb;50(2):102046. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102046. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine, antimalarial, age and gender relation to COVID-19 spread and mortality.卡介苗疫苗、抗疟药、年龄和性别与 COVID-19 传播和死亡率的关系。
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 31;38(35):5564-5568. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.083. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
9
First-time handling of different inhalers by chronic obstructive lung disease patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者首次使用不同吸入器。
Exp Lung Res. 2020 Sep;46(7):258-269. doi: 10.1080/01902148.2020.1789903. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.微创外科手术与剖腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的比较:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 7.