• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HyperArc VMAT 计划用于单发和多发脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科治疗:一种新的治疗计划方法。

HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 537-8567, Japan.

Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z
PMID:29378610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5789615/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The HyperArc VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach was newly developed to fulfill the demands of dose delivery for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the HA-VMAT plan with those of the conventional VMAT (C-VMAT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 23 patients (1-4 brain metastases), C-VMAT and HA-VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 20-24 Gy were retrospectively generated, and dosimetric parameters for PTV (homogeneity index, HI; conformity index, CI; gradient index, GI) and brain tissue (V-V) were evaluated. Subsequently, the physical characteristics (modulation complexity score for VMAT, MCSV; Monitor unit, MU) of both treatment approaches were compared.

RESULTS

HA-VMAT provided higher HI (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.24 ± 0.07, p < 0.01), CI (0.93 ± 0.02 vs. 0.90 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) and lower GI (3.06 ± 0.42 vs. 3.91 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) values. Moderate-to-low dose spreads (V-V) were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the HA-VMAT plan over that of C-VMAT. HA-VMAT plans resulted in more complex MLC patterns (lower MCSV, p < 0.01) and higher MU (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HA-VMAT plans provided significantly higher conformity and rapid dose falloff with respect to the C-VMAT plans.

摘要

目的

新开发的 HyperArcVMAT(HA-VMAT)计划方法旨在满足脑转移立体定向放射外科的剂量传递要求。我们比较了 HA-VMAT 计划和传统 VMAT(C-VMAT)的剂量学参数。

材料和方法

回顾性地为 23 名患者(1-4 个脑转移灶)生成了 C-VMAT 和 HA-VMAT 计划,处方剂量为 20-24Gy,并评估了 PTV(均匀性指数、HI;适形指数、CI;梯度指数、GI)和脑组织(V-V)的剂量学参数。随后,比较了两种治疗方法的物理特性(VMAT 的调制复杂度评分、MCSV;监测单位、MU)。

结果

HA-VMAT 提供了更高的 HI(1.41±0.07 对 1.24±0.07,p<0.01)、CI(0.93±0.02 对 0.90±0.05,p=0.01)和更低的 GI(3.06±0.42 对 3.91±0.55,p<0.01)值。HA-VMAT 计划中的中低剂量分布(V-V)明显减少(p<0.01)。HA-VMAT 计划导致更复杂的 MLC 模式(较低的 MCSV,p<0.01)和更高的 MU(p<0.01)。

结论

HA-VMAT 计划在 C-VMAT 计划的基础上提供了更高的一致性和更快的剂量衰减。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/386864df9a7a/13014_2017_948_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/d59f8e53bb3e/13014_2017_948_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/b18df0d64dce/13014_2017_948_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/386864df9a7a/13014_2017_948_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/d59f8e53bb3e/13014_2017_948_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/b18df0d64dce/13014_2017_948_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c7b/5789615/386864df9a7a/13014_2017_948_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach.HyperArc VMAT 计划用于单发和多发脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科治疗:一种新的治疗计划方法。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0948-z.
2
Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique.基于直线加速器的 VMAT 立体定向放射手术治疗多个脑病变:常规多等中心方法与新专用单等中心技术的比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 5;13(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0985-2.
3
Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases.准直器角度对单发性和多发性脑转移瘤的HyperArc立体定向放射治疗计划的影响。
Med Dosim. 2020;45(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
4
Dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors in stereotactic radiosurgery with HyperArc for single and multiple brain metastases.立体定向放射外科中 HyperArc 治疗单发和多发脑转移瘤的旋转摆位误差的剂量学效应。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Oct;20(10):84-91. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12716. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Dosimetric potential of knowledge-based planning model trained with HyperArc plans for brain metastases.基于 HyperArc 计划训练的知识型计划模型在脑转移瘤中的剂量学潜力。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Feb;24(2):e13836. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13836. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
6
Linac-based radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Comparison between two mono-isocenter techniques with multiple non-coplanar arcs.基于直线加速器的多发脑转移瘤放射外科治疗:两种单等中心多非共面弧技术的比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Automated noncoplanar treatment planning strategy in stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple cranial metastases: HyperArc and CyberKnife dose distributions.多发性脑转移瘤立体定向放射治疗中的自动非共面治疗计划策略:HyperArc与射波刀的剂量分布
Med Dosim. 2019;44(4):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Dosimetric evaluation of LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with more than 20 targets: comparing MME, HyperArc, and RapidArc.基于 LINAC 的单中心多靶多点分次立体定向放射外科治疗 20 个以上靶区的剂量学评估:比较 MME、HyperArc 和 RapidArc。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 7;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02416-7.
9
Single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: dosimetric comparison of VMAT and a dedicated DCAT planning tool.单中心立体定向放射外科治疗多发脑转移瘤:VMAT 和专用 DCAT 计划工具的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 11;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1315-z.
10
Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.脑转移瘤机器人放射外科的剂量学质量与治疗效率:与基于C形臂直线加速器的计划的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Nov;20(11):104-110. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12746. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of intra-fractional target displacement by patient motion during a single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases.在单等中心多靶点立体定向放射治疗脑转移瘤过程中,评估患者运动引起的分次内靶区位移。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Sep;26(9):e70219. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70219.
2
Reporting Clinical Results of EPID-Based Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Brain Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiation Therapy: Demonstrating the Feasibility of Same-Day Stereotactic Radiosurgery via HyperArc Delivery.基于电子射野影像装置的脑立体定向放射外科/放射治疗患者特异性质量保证的临床结果报告:证明通过HyperArc技术实现当日立体定向放射外科的可行性。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 7;10(8):101831. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101831. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Can clinically relevant dose errors in patient anatomy be detected by gamma passing rate or modulation complexity score in volumetric-modulated arc therapy for intracranial tumors?在颅内肿瘤的容积调强弧形治疗中,患者解剖结构中临床相关的剂量误差能否通过伽马通过率或调制复杂度评分检测出来?
J Radiat Res. 2017 Sep 1;58(5):685-692. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrx006.
2
Optimization of Treatment Geometry to Reduce Normal Brain Dose in Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases with Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.采用单等中心容积调强弧形放疗优化治疗几何结构以降低多发脑转移瘤放射外科治疗中的正常脑剂量
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 30;6:34511. doi: 10.1038/srep34511.
3
Dosimetric evaluation of a novel automated noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for treating optic nerve sheath meningiomas.一种用于治疗视神经鞘膜瘤的新型自动非共面容积调强弧形治疗技术的剂量学评估
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 27;15:1531918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1531918. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of Multileaf Collimator Width and Normal Tissue Objective on Radiation Dose Distribution in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using HyperArc for Single Brain Lesions.多叶准直器宽度和正常组织目标对使用HyperArc技术治疗单发性脑病变的立体定向放射外科中辐射剂量分布的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2025 May 7;32(5):272. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050272.
5
Total brain dose estimation in single-isocenter-multiple-targets (SIMT) radiosurgery via a novel deep neural network with spherical convolutions.通过具有球形卷积的新型深度神经网络进行单等中心多靶点(SIMT)放射外科手术中的全脑剂量估计。
Med Phys. 2025 Jun;52(6):4266-4277. doi: 10.1002/mp.17748. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
6
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using coplanar VMAT for single small brain metastasis: dosimetric analysis and clinical outcomes.使用共面容积调强弧形放疗对单个小脑转移瘤进行大分割立体定向放射治疗:剂量学分析和临床结果
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 27;15:1428922. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1428922. eCollection 2025.
7
A Dosimetric Comparison of HyperArc Therapy Planning and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning in Treating Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme.针对多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者,HyperArc治疗计划与容积调强弧形治疗计划的剂量学比较
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1009-1021. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13906.
8
A knowledge-based planning model to identify fraction-reduction opportunities in brain stereotactic radiotherapy.一种基于知识的规划模型,用于识别脑立体定向放射治疗中减少分次剂量的机会。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Apr;26(4):e70055. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70055. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
9
Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques.MLC误差对单等中心多脑转移瘤SRS治疗中剂量分布的影响:DCAT与VMAT技术的比较
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024 Dec 4;29(5):531-543. doi: 10.5603/rpor.102616. eCollection 2024.
10
Effects of Institutional Experience on Plan Quality in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using HyperArc for Brain Metastases.机构经验对使用HyperArc技术进行脑转移瘤立体定向放射治疗计划质量的影响。
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):210-217. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13819.
Dosimetric comparison between cone/Iris-based and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans for single and multiple brain metastases.
基于锥形准直器/虹膜准直器和基于InCise多叶准直器的射波刀计划对单发性和多发性脑转移瘤的剂量学比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):184-199. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6260.
4
Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife.多发性脑转移瘤放射外科治疗的计划质量与治疗效率:非共面容积旋转调强放疗与伽玛刀对比
Front Oncol. 2016 Feb 11;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00026. eCollection 2016.
5
Evaluation of a dedicated brain metastases treatment planning optimization for radiosurgery: a new treatment paradigm?用于放射外科的专用脑转移瘤治疗计划优化评估:一种新的治疗模式?
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Feb 2;11:13. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0593-y.
6
Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline.新诊断脑转移瘤的放射治疗与手术管理:美国放射肿瘤学会循证指南
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jul-Sep;2(3):210-225. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: potential to improve tumor control and late toxicity.4π 非共面立体定向体部放射治疗头颈部肿瘤:提高肿瘤控制率和迟发性毒性的潜力。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.043. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
Feasibility of extreme dose escalation for glioblastoma multiforme using 4π radiotherapy.使用4π放疗对多形性胶质母细胞瘤进行极高剂量递增的可行性。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov 7;9:239. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0239-x.
9
Coplanar VMAT vs. noncoplanar VMAT in the treatment of sinonasal cancer.共面容积调强弧形放疗与非共面容积调强弧形放疗在鼻窦癌治疗中的比较
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Jan;191(1):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0760-8. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
Predictors of individual tumor local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者立体定向放射外科治疗后肿瘤局部控制的预测因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Oct 1;90(2):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.047. Epub 2014 Jul 30.