• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MLC误差对单等中心多脑转移瘤SRS治疗中剂量分布的影响:DCAT与VMAT技术的比较

Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques.

作者信息

Katayama Hiroki, Kobata Takuya, Kitaoka Motonori, Takahashi Shigeo, Shibata Toru

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024 Dec 4;29(5):531-543. doi: 10.5603/rpor.102616. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5603/rpor.102616
PMID:39759551
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698555/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can achieve near equal plan quality in single-isocenter multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) errors during beam delivery on the dose distribution for each technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 10-mm diameter delineation of the three targets was employed on the computed tomography images of a head phantom, and the reference plans were created using the DCAT and VMAT. We simulated the systematic opened and closed MLC errors. 10 MLC error plans with different magnitudes of errors were created in each technique. We investigated the relationship between the magnitude of MLC errors and the change in dose-volume histogram parameters of the targets and normal brain tissue.

RESULTS

The percentage change in the D (Gy) and D (Gy) of the target per millimeter of the MLC errors were 13.3% and 2.7% for the DCAT and 15.3% and 9.3% for the VMAT, respectively. The fluctuations of the maximum dose were very small for the DCAT compared to the VMAT. Changes in the V (cc) of the normal brain tissue were 47.1%/mm and 53.2%/mm for the DCAT and VMAT, respectively, which are comparable changes for both techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the impact of MLC errors on the target coverage and the normal brain tissue is comparable for both techniques, the internal dose of the targets generated by the DCAT technique is robust to the MLC errors.

摘要

背景

在脑转移瘤的单等中心多靶点立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)中,动态适形弧形治疗(DCAT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)可实现近乎相同的计划质量。本研究旨在探讨射束传输过程中多叶准直器(MLC)误差对每种技术剂量分布的影响。

材料与方法

在头部体模的计算机断层扫描图像上对三个靶点进行直径10毫米的勾画,并使用DCAT和VMAT创建参考计划。我们模拟了MLC的系统性打开和关闭误差。在每种技术中创建了10个具有不同误差幅度的MLC误差计划。我们研究了MLC误差幅度与靶点及正常脑组织剂量体积直方图参数变化之间的关系。

结果

对于DCAT,每毫米MLC误差导致的靶点D(Gy)和D(Gy)的百分比变化分别为13.3%和2.7%,对于VMAT分别为15.3%和9.3%。与VMAT相比,DCAT的最大剂量波动非常小。对于DCAT和VMAT,正常脑组织V(cc)的变化分别为47.1%/毫米和53.2%/毫米,两种技术的变化相当。

结论

尽管两种技术中MLC误差对靶点覆盖和正常脑组织的影响相当,但DCAT技术产生的靶点内部剂量对MLC误差具有较强的耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/3b2b67bee273/rpor-29-5-531f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/4af255d2090a/rpor-29-5-531f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/af0190c9e176/rpor-29-5-531f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/1e9f3fa0744e/rpor-29-5-531f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/353ccb8f5e33/rpor-29-5-531f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/274c3660f9a5/rpor-29-5-531f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/ea16b3448fbd/rpor-29-5-531f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/84dbcbecaa1e/rpor-29-5-531f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/3b2b67bee273/rpor-29-5-531f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/4af255d2090a/rpor-29-5-531f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/af0190c9e176/rpor-29-5-531f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/1e9f3fa0744e/rpor-29-5-531f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/353ccb8f5e33/rpor-29-5-531f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/274c3660f9a5/rpor-29-5-531f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/ea16b3448fbd/rpor-29-5-531f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/84dbcbecaa1e/rpor-29-5-531f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3146/11698555/3b2b67bee273/rpor-29-5-531f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of MLC error on dose distribution in SRS treatment of single-isocenter multiple brain metastases: comparison between DCAT and VMAT techniques.MLC误差对单等中心多脑转移瘤SRS治疗中剂量分布的影响:DCAT与VMAT技术的比较
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024 Dec 4;29(5):531-543. doi: 10.5603/rpor.102616. eCollection 2024.
2
SU-E-T-645: Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases Using Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: Comparison with Conventional Dynamic Conformal Arc and Static Beam Stereotactic Radiosurgery.SU-E-T-645:使用单等中心容积调强弧形放疗立体定向放射外科治疗多发脑转移瘤:与传统动态适形弧形放疗和静态射野立体定向放射外科的比较
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part20):3854. doi: 10.1118/1.4735734.
3
Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.关于颅内多靶点立体定向放射治疗计划对交付误差稳健性的多机构调查。
Med Phys. 2024 Feb;51(2):910-921. doi: 10.1002/mp.16907. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
4
Dosimetric Performance and Planning/Delivery Efficiency of a Dual-Layer Stacked and Staggered MLC on Treating Multiple Small Targets: A Planning Study Based on Single-Isocenter Multi-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to Brain Metastases.双层堆叠交错式多叶准直器在治疗多个小靶点时的剂量学性能及计划/实施效率:基于单等中心多靶点立体定向放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的计划研究
Front Oncol. 2019 Jan 22;9:7. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00007. eCollection 2019.
5
Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric evaluation of two automated treatment planning systems.单中心多靶立体定向放射外科治疗多发脑转移瘤:两种自动治疗计划系统的剂量学评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02086-3.
6
Radiosurgery treatment planning using conformal arc informed volumetric modulated arc therapy.基于适形弧形实现容积旋转调强弧形治疗的放射外科治疗计划。
Med Dosim. 2021;46(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
7
Dosimetric comparison among dynamic conformal arc therapy, coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for single brain metastasis.单发性脑转移瘤的动态适形弧形放疗、共面和非共面容积调强弧形放疗的剂量学比较
J Radiat Res. 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab092.
8
Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans.系统调强叶片位置不确定性对单中心多靶容积旋转调强弧形立体定向放射治疗计划质量的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13708. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13708. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy.使用单等中心容积旋转调强弧形治疗技术治疗多个靶区的立体定向放射外科计划的回顾性质量指标审查。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jun;21(6):93-99. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12869. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: dosimetric comparison of VMAT and a dedicated DCAT planning tool.单中心立体定向放射外科治疗多发脑转移瘤:VMAT 和专用 DCAT 计划工具的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 11;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1315-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing anisotropic margins in single-isocenter multiple brain metastases radiosurgery using regressor strategies: A multi-institutional validation study.使用回归策略优化单中心多脑转移瘤放射外科治疗中的各向异性边缘:一项多机构验证研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Sep;26(9):e70249. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70249.
2
Tumor-driven SRS VMAT planning: Regression models for intermediate and low dose spillage.肿瘤驱动的立体定向放射治疗容积调强弧形治疗计划:中低剂量溢出的回归模型
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Aug;26(8):e70184. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70184.

本文引用的文献

1
Geometric and dosimetric consequences of intra-fractional movement in single isocenter non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery.单中心非共面立体定向放射外科中分次内运动的几何和剂量学后果。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02195-z.
2
Cochlear sparing in LINAC-based radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc, IMRT and VMAT treatment plans.基于 LINAC 的放射外科治疗前庭神经鞘瘤时保留耳蜗:动态适形弧、调强放疗和容积旋转调强治疗计划的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02188-y.
3
Comparison of dosimetric effects of MLC positional errors on VMAT and IMRT plans for SBRT radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
比较非小细胞肺癌 SBRT 放疗中 VMAT 和 IMRT 计划中 MLC 位置误差的剂量学效应。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278422. eCollection 2022.
4
Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric evaluation of two automated treatment planning systems.单中心多靶立体定向放射外科治疗多发脑转移瘤:两种自动治疗计划系统的剂量学评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02086-3.
5
Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans.系统调强叶片位置不确定性对单中心多靶容积旋转调强弧形立体定向放射治疗计划质量的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13708. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13708. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Dosimetric comparison among dynamic conformal arc therapy, coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for single brain metastasis.单发性脑转移瘤的动态适形弧形放疗、共面和非共面容积调强弧形放疗的剂量学比较
J Radiat Res. 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab092.
7
Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics.单中心动态适形弧形治疗技术与伽玛刀放射外科治疗多发性脑转移瘤的剂量学研究:靶区几何特征的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 27;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01766-w.
8
Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy.放射治疗中高清多叶准直器的剂量学叶片间距与剂量计算误差之间的关系。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;5:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.003. eCollection 2018 Jan.
9
Inter-unit variability of multi-leaf collimator parameters for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: a multi-institutional survey.多叶准直器参数在调强放疗和容积旋转调强治疗计划中的单元间变异性:一项多机构调查。
J Radiat Res. 2020 Mar 23;61(2):307-313. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz082.
10
On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system.需要调整 Eclipse 治疗计划系统中立体定向治疗计划的剂量学叶间隙。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):68-77. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12656. Epub 2019 Jun 21.