Holt Ditte Heering, Rod Morten Hulvej, Waldorff Susanne Boch, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen Tine
University of Southern Denmark, National Institute of Public Health, Studiestræde 6, Copenhagen, 1455, Denmark.
Metropolitan University College, National Research Centre for Disadvantaged Children and Young People, Kronprinsesse Sofies Vej 35, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2864-9.
For more than 30 years policy action across sectors has been celebrated as a necessary and viable way to affect the social factors impacting on health. In particular intersectoral action on the social determinants of health is considered necessary to address social inequalities in health. However, despite growing support for intersectoral policymaking, implementation remains a challenge. Critics argue that public health has remained naïve about the policy process and a better understanding is needed. Based on ethnographic data, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of a local process of intersectoral policymaking in order to gain a better understanding of the challenges posed by implementation. To help conceptualize the process, we apply the theoretical perspective of organizational neo-institutionalism, in particular the concepts of rationalized myth and decoupling.
On the basis of an explorative study among ten Danish municipalities, we conducted an ethnographic study of the development of a municipal-wide implementation strategy for the intersectoral health policy of a medium-sized municipality. The main data sources consist of ethnographic field notes from participant observation and interview transcripts.
By providing detailed contextual description, we show how an apparent failure to move from policy to action is played out by the ongoing production of abstract rhetoric and vague plans. We find that idealization of universal intersectoralism, inconsistent demands, and doubts about economic outcomes challenge the notion of implementation as moving from rhetoric to action.
We argue that the 'myth' of intersectoralism may be instrumental in avoiding the specification of action to implement the policy, and that the policy instead serves as a way to display and support good intentions and hereby continue the process. On this basis we expand the discussion on implementation challenges regarding intersectoral policymaking for health.
三十多年来,跨部门的政策行动一直被视为影响健康相关社会因素的必要且可行的方式。特别是,针对健康问题的社会决定因素采取跨部门行动,被认为是解决健康方面社会不平等问题的必要举措。然而,尽管对跨部门政策制定的支持不断增加,但实施仍然是一项挑战。批评者认为,公共卫生部门对政策制定过程一直缺乏了解,需要有更深入的认识。基于人种志数据,本文对一个地方跨部门政策制定过程进行了深入分析,以便更好地理解实施过程中所面临的挑战。为了帮助理解这一过程,我们运用了组织新制度主义的理论视角,特别是合理化神话和解耦的概念。
在对丹麦十个城市进行探索性研究的基础上,我们对一个中等规模城市的跨部门卫生政策在全市范围内实施策略的制定过程进行了人种志研究。主要数据来源包括参与观察的人种志实地记录和访谈记录。
通过提供详细的背景描述,我们展示了抽象言辞和模糊计划的不断产生是如何导致从政策到行动的明显失败。我们发现,对普遍跨部门主义的理想化、相互矛盾的要求以及对经济成果的质疑,对从言辞到行动的实施概念提出了挑战。
我们认为,跨部门主义的“神话”可能有助于避免明确规定实施政策的行动,而且该政策反而成为一种展示和支持良好意愿的方式,从而使这一过程得以持续。在此基础上,我们拓展了关于健康领域跨部门政策制定实施挑战的讨论。