Tooley Kristen M, Traxler Matthew J
Texas State University.
University of California, Davis.
J Mem Lang. 2018 Feb;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
The aim of this study was to determine whether cumulative structural priming effects and trial-to-trial lexically-mediated priming effects are produced by the same mechanism in comprehension. Participants took part in a five-session eye tracking study where they read reduced-relative prime-target pairs with the same initial verb. Half of the verbs in these sentences were repeated across the five sessions and half were novel to each session. Total fixation times on the syntactically challenging parts of prime sentences decreased across sessions, suggesting participants implicitly learned the structure. Additional priming was also observed at the critical regions of the target sentences, and the magnitude of this effect did not change over the five sessions. These finding suggests long-lived adaptation to structure and short-lived lexically-mediated priming effects are caused by separate mechanisms in comprehension. A dual mechanism account of syntactic priming effects can best reconcile these results.
本研究的目的是确定在理解过程中,累积结构启动效应和逐次试验的词汇介导启动效应是否由相同机制产生。参与者参加了一项为期五节的眼动追踪研究,他们阅读具有相同初始动词的简化相对启动-目标对。这些句子中一半的动词在五个节次中重复出现,另一半则在每个节次中都是新的。启动句中句法挑战性部分的总注视时间在各节次中减少,这表明参与者隐性地学习了结构。在目标句的关键区域也观察到了额外的启动效应,并且这种效应的大小在五个节次中没有变化。这些发现表明,对结构的长期适应性和短暂的词汇介导启动效应是由理解中的不同机制引起的。句法启动效应的双重机制解释最能调和这些结果。