Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
World J Urol. 2018 May;36(5):801-809. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2185-y. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
These studies were undertaken to determine if fexapotide triflutate 2.5 mg transrectal injectable (FT) has significant long-term (LT) safety and efficacy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Two placebo controlled double-blind randomized parallel group trials with 995 BPH patients at 72 sites treated 3:2 FT:placebo, with open-label FT crossover (CO) re-injection in 2 trials n = 344 and long-term follow-up (LF) 2-6.75 years (mean 3.58 years, median 3.67 years; FT re-injection CO mean 4.27 years, median 4.42 years) were evaluated. 12 months post-treatment patients elected no further treatment, approved oral medications, FT, or interventional treatment. Primary endpoint variable was change in Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months and at LF. CO primary co-endpoints were 3-year incidence of (1) surgery for BPH in FT treated CO patients versus patients crossed over to oral BPH medications and (2) surgery or acute urinary retention in FT-treated CO placebo patients versus placebo patients crossed over to oral BPH medications. 28 CO secondary endpoints assessed surgical and symptomatic outcomes in FT reinjected patients versus conventional BPH medication CO and control subgroups at 2 and 3 years.
FT injection had no significant safety differences from placebo. LF IPSS change from baseline was higher in FT treated patients compared to placebo (median FT group improvement - 5.2 versus placebo - 3.0, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of AUR (1.08% p = 0.0058) and prostate cancer (PCa) (1.1% p = 0.0116) were both reduced in FT treated patients. LF incidence of intervention for BPH was reduced in the FT group versus oral BPH medications (8.08% versus 27.85% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of intervention or AUR in placebo CO group with FT versus placebo CO group with oral medications was reduced (6.07% versus 33.3% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). 28/28 secondary efficacy endpoints were reached in LF CO re-injection studies.
FT 2.5 mg is a safe and effective transrectal injectable for LT treatment of BPH. FT treated patients also had reduced need for BPH intervention, and reduced incidence of PCa and AUR.
这些研究旨在确定氟他胺三氟酸盐 2.5mg 经直肠注射(FT)是否对治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)具有显著的长期(LT)安全性和疗效。
在 72 个地点的 995 名 BPH 患者中进行了两项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机平行组试验,FT:安慰剂比例为 3:2,在两项试验中,有 344 名患者进行了开放标签的 FT 交叉(CO)再注射,长期随访(LF)2-6.75 年(平均 3.58 年,中位数 3.67 年;FT 再注射 CO 平均 4.27 年,中位数 4.42 年)。治疗后 12 个月,患者选择不再接受治疗、批准口服药物、FT 或介入治疗。主要终点变量为治疗后 12 个月和 LF 时症状评分(IPSS)的变化。CO 的主要次要终点为(1)FT 治疗的 CO 患者中因 BPH 而行手术与交叉至口服 BPH 药物的患者相比的 3 年发生率,以及(2)FT 治疗的 CO 安慰剂患者中因手术或急性尿潴留与交叉至口服 BPH 药物的安慰剂患者相比的发生率。28 项 CO 次要终点评估了 FT 再注射患者与传统 BPH 药物 CO 和对照组在 2 年和 3 年时的手术和症状结果。
FT 注射与安慰剂相比无显著安全性差异。与安慰剂相比,FT 治疗患者的 LF IPSS 基线变化更高(FT 组中位数改善-5.2,安慰剂组-3.0,p<0.0001)。FT 治疗患者的急性尿潴留(AUR)(1.08%,p=0.0058)和前列腺癌(PCa)(1.1%,p=0.0116)的发生率均降低。FT 组与口服 BPH 药物相比,LF 时 BPH 干预的发生率降低(3 年时分别为 8.08%和 27.85%,p<0.0001)。FT CO 再注射研究中,LF 时安慰剂 CO 组与 FT 相比,安慰剂 CO 组与口服药物相比,干预或 AUR 的发生率降低(3 年时分别为 6.07%和 33.3%,p<0.0001)。LF CO 再注射研究中,28/28 项次要疗效终点均达到。
FT 2.5mg 是一种安全有效的经直肠注射剂,可用于治疗 BPH 的长期治疗。FT 治疗的患者也减少了对 BPH 干预的需求,并降低了 PCa 和 AUR 的发生率。