Suppr超能文献

针对多重疾病和高护理利用率的护理管理干预措施的系统评价。

A systematic review of care management interventions targeting multimorbidity and high care utilization.

作者信息

Baker Jennifer M, Grant Richard W, Gopalan Anjali

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2881-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of care management programs for complex patients has been inconclusive. However, past reviews have not focused on complexity primarily defined by multimorbidity and healthcare utilization. We conducted a systematic review of care management interventions targeting the following three patient groups: adults with two or more chronic medical conditions, adults with at least one chronic medical condition and concurrent depression, and adults identified based solely on high past or predicted healthcare utilization.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from PubMed, published between 06/01/2005 and 05/31/2015, and reported findings from a randomized intervention that tested a comprehensive, care management intervention. Identified interventions were grouped based on the three "complex" categories of interest (described above). Two investigators extracted data using a structured abstraction form and assessed RCT quality.

RESULTS

We screened 989 article titles for eligibility from which 847 were excluded. After reviewing the remaining 142 abstracts, 83 articles were excluded. We reviewed the full-text of 59 full-text articles and identified 15 unique RCTs for the final analysis. Of these 15 studies, two focused on patients with two or more chronic medical conditions, seven on patients with at least one chronic medical condition and depression, and six on patients with high past or predicted healthcare utilization. Measured outcomes included utilization, chronic disease measures, and patient-reported outcomes. The seven studies targeting patients with at least one chronic medical condition and depression demonstrated significant improvement in depression symptoms (ranging from 9.2 to 48.7% improvement). Of the six studies that focused on high utilizers, two showed small reductions in utilization. The quality of the research methodology in most of the studies (12/15) was rated fair or poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions were more likely to be successful when patients were selected based on having at least one chronic medical condition and concurrent depression, and when patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Future research should focus on the role of mental health in complex care management, finding better methods for identifying patients who would benefit most from care management, and determining which intervention components are needed for which patients.

摘要

背景

支持复杂患者护理管理项目有效性的证据尚无定论。然而,以往的综述并未主要聚焦于由多种疾病并存和医疗服务利用情况所定义的复杂性。我们针对以下三类患者群体对护理管理干预措施进行了系统综述:患有两种或更多慢性疾病的成年人、患有至少一种慢性疾病且并发抑郁症的成年人,以及仅根据过去或预测的高医疗服务利用率确定的成年人。

方法

从2005年6月1日至2015年5月31日期间发表在PubMed上的文章中识别符合条件的研究,并报告一项测试全面护理管理干预措施的随机干预研究结果。所识别的干预措施根据上述三类“复杂”患者群体进行分组。两名研究人员使用结构化摘要表格提取数据并评估随机对照试验的质量。

结果

我们筛选了989篇文章标题以确定其是否符合条件,其中847篇被排除。在审查其余142篇摘要后,又排除了83篇文章。我们审查了59篇全文文章,并确定了15项独特的随机对照试验用于最终分析。在这15项研究中,两项聚焦于患有两种或更多慢性疾病的患者,七项聚焦于患有至少一种慢性疾病且伴有抑郁症的患者,六项聚焦于过去或预测医疗服务利用率高的患者。测量的结果包括医疗服务利用率、慢性病指标以及患者报告的结果。针对患有至少一种慢性疾病且伴有抑郁症患者的七项研究表明,抑郁症状有显著改善(改善幅度从9.2%至48.7%不等)。在聚焦于高医疗服务利用率患者的六项研究中,两项显示医疗服务利用率略有下降。大多数研究(12/15)的研究方法质量被评为一般或较差。

结论

当根据患者患有至少一种慢性疾病且并发抑郁症进行选择,以及评估患者报告的结果时,干预措施更有可能取得成功。未来的研究应聚焦于心理健康在复杂护理管理中的作用,找到更好的方法来识别最能从护理管理中受益的患者,以及确定针对哪些患者需要哪些干预组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ad5/5791200/9cc99b589224/12913_2018_2881_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验