Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):619-630. doi: 10.1111/anae.14212. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Although target-controlled infusion has been in use for more than two decades, its benefits are being obscured by anomalies in clinical practice caused by a number of important problems. These include: a variety of pharmacokinetic models available in open target-controlled infusion systems, which often confuse the user; the extrapolation of anthropomorphic data which provokes anomalous adjustments of dosing by such systems; and the uncertainty of regulatory requirements for the application of target-controlled infusion which causes uncontrolled exploitation of drugs and pharmacokinetic models in target-controlled infusion devices. Comparison of performance of pharmacokinetic models is complex and mostly inconclusive. However, a specific behaviour of a model in a target-controlled infusion system that is neither intended nor supported by scientific data can be considered an artefact or anomaly. Several of these anomalies can be identified in the current commercially available target-controlled infusion systems and are discussed in this review.
尽管靶控输注已经使用了二十多年,但由于一些重要问题,其优势被临床实践中的异常所掩盖。这些问题包括:开放靶控输注系统中提供的各种药代动力学模型,这常常使用户感到困惑;人体模型数据的推断,这会导致此类系统对剂量进行异常调整;以及靶控输注应用的监管要求的不确定性,这导致药物和药代动力学模型在靶控输注设备中的不受控制的开发。药代动力学模型的性能比较非常复杂,且大多没有定论。然而,在靶控输注系统中,模型的一种特定行为既不是有意的,也没有得到科学数据的支持,可以被认为是一种人为产物或异常。在当前市售的靶控输注系统中可以识别出其中的几个异常,并在本综述中进行了讨论。