Malachauskiene Laima, Bhavsar Rajesh, Bakke Skule, Keller Jeppe, Bhavsar Swati, Luy Anne-Marie, Strøm Thomas
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, South Jutland Hospitals, South Denmark University, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200 Aabenraa, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Odense university hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 22;60(12):1921. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121921.
Breast cancer surgeries offer challenges in perioperative pain management, especially in the presence of inherent risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Inappropriate opioid consumption was speculated as one of the reasons. Through this study, the influence of objective pain monitoring through a nociception level monitor (NOL) on perioperative course in breast surgeries was investigated. This was a prospective randomized study conducted at a regional hospital. Sixty female patients posted for breast cancer surgery were randomized equally into study and control groups. Both groups were monitored using BIS and NOL, but in the control group, the NOL monitor was blinded by a cover. Both groups received propofol and remifentanil through target-controlled infusions (TCIs) along with interpectoral, pectoserratus (PECS II), and superficial pectointercostal block. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were PONV, eligibility for discharge from the recovery room, and symptoms of PMPS after three months. Two patients were excluded. The study group received significantly less remifentanil (0.9 mg in the study group vs. 1.35 mg in the control group, = 0.033) and morphine (2.5 mg in study group vs. 5 mg in control group, = 0.013). There was no difference in PMPS symptoms between the groups. The study group showed longer duration of inadequate analgesia (i.e., 7% vs. 10% of the total intraoperative period in control and study group, respectively, = 0.008). There was no difference in time to eligibility for discharge from the recovery room between the groups. NOL monitor-guided analgesic delivery reduces intraoperative opioid consumption. No difference was demonstrated on PONV, eligibility for discharge from the recovery room, or PMPS symptoms.
乳腺癌手术在围手术期疼痛管理方面存在挑战,尤其是存在术后恶心呕吐(PONV)和乳房切除术后疼痛综合征(PMPS)的固有风险时。推测阿片类药物使用不当是原因之一。通过本研究,调查了通过伤害感受水平监测仪(NOL)进行客观疼痛监测对乳腺手术围手术期过程的影响。这是一项在地区医院进行的前瞻性随机研究。60名拟行乳腺癌手术的女性患者被平均随机分为研究组和对照组。两组均使用脑电双频指数(BIS)和NOL进行监测,但在对照组中,NOL监测仪用盖子遮盖使其不被看见。两组均通过靶控输注(TCI)给予丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼,并联合胸肌间、胸锯肌(PECS II)和浅表胸肋间隙阻滞。主要结局是术中阿片类药物的消耗量。次要结局是PONV、从恢复室出院的适宜性以及三个月后PMPS的症状。两名患者被排除。研究组接受的瑞芬太尼明显较少(研究组为0.9毫克,对照组为1.35毫克,P = 0.033),吗啡也较少(研究组为2.5毫克,对照组为5毫克,P = 0.013)。两组之间PMPS症状没有差异。研究组显示镇痛不足的持续时间更长(即分别占对照组和研究组术中总时长的7%和10%,P = 0.008)。两组之间从恢复室出院的适宜时间没有差异。NOL监测仪引导的镇痛给药减少了术中阿片类药物的消耗量。在PONV、从恢复室出院的适宜性或PMPS症状方面未显示出差异。