文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

课堂与临床环境中的不诚实行为:认知与参与度

Dishonest Behavior in the Classroom and Clinical Setting: Perceptions and Engagement.

作者信息

McClung Emily Lauren, Schneider Joanne Kraenzle

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2018 Feb 1;57(2):79-87. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180123-04.


DOI:10.3928/01484834-20180123-04
PMID:29384568
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing students sometimes engage in academically dishonest behaviors despite honor codes and policies. We believe that learning more about nursing students' perceptions of and engagement in academically dishonest behaviors will aid faculty in crafting more effective codes, policies, and educational modules. METHOD: Baccalaureate nursing students from accredited programs across the nation were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional descriptive correlational survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive and correlational statistics. RESULTS: Nursing students do not perceive all academically dishonest behavior as dishonest. There is a positive relationship between perceptions of behaviors in the classroom and clinical setting. Students have higher rates of engagement in behaviors they do not perceive as dishonest. Those who engage in the behaviors considered dishonest have higher rates of rationalization. CONCLUSION: Faculty need to delineate to students what behaviors are deemed dishonest in a course. Eliminating ambiguity has potential to reduce engagement in dishonest behavior. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(2):79-87.].

摘要

背景:尽管有荣誉准则和政策,护理专业学生有时仍会做出学术不诚实行为。我们认为,更多地了解护理专业学生对学术不诚实行为的认知及其参与情况,将有助于教师制定更有效的准则、政策和教育模块。 方法:邀请全国认证项目中的本科护理专业学生参与一项在线横断面描述性相关性调查。使用描述性和相关性统计方法对数据进行分析。 结果:护理专业学生并不认为所有学术不诚实行为都是不诚实的。在课堂和临床环境中对行为的认知之间存在正相关关系。学生对他们不认为不诚实的行为参与率更高。那些参与被认为不诚实行为的人有更高的合理化率。 结论:教师需要向学生明确课程中哪些行为被视为不诚实。消除模糊性有可能减少不诚实行为的参与。[《护理教育杂志》。2018年;57(2):79 - 87。]

相似文献

[1]
Dishonest Behavior in the Classroom and Clinical Setting: Perceptions and Engagement.

J Nurs Educ. 2018-2-1

[2]
Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students: A Contemporary View.

Nurse Educ.

[3]
Crossing the "line": College students and academic integrity in nursing.

Nurse Educ Today. 2017-9

[4]
The development and testing of the Nursing Student Perceptions of Dishonesty Scale.

Nurse Educ Today. 2018-2

[5]
Evaluation of a Clinical Policy Learning Activity.

J Nurs Educ. 2018-1-1

[6]
Profiling nursing students' dishonest behaviour: Classroom versus clinical settings.

Nurs Ethics. 2022-9

[7]
Nursing students and teaching of codes of ethics: an empirical research study.

Int Nurs Rev. 2009-12

[8]
Promoting integrity among nursing students.

J Nurs Educ. 2007-1

[9]
Engaging Nursing Students in a Culture of Integrity.

J Nurs Educ. 2018-4-1

[10]
New Zealand nursing students' perceptions of biosciences: A cross-sectional survey of relevance to practice, teaching delivery, self-competence and challenges.

Nurse Educ Today. 2019-5-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Promoting Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students in Academic Integrity Through a Digital Serious Game: A Pre/Post-Test Study.

Nurs Rep. 2025-1-27

[2]
Predicting Clinical Dishonesty Among Nursing Students: The Impact of Personal and Contextual Factors.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-12-22

[3]
Nursing Students' Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty During Examinations and Assignments: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Cureus. 2024-1-17

[4]
Academic integrity among nursing students: A survey of knowledge and behavior.

Nurs Ethics. 2024-6

[5]
Profiling nursing students' dishonest behaviour: Classroom versus clinical settings.

Nurs Ethics. 2022-9

[6]
Plagiarism in nursing education and the ethical implications in practice.

Heliyon. 2019-3-19

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索