Nortes Isabelle, Fierz Katharina, Goddiksen Mads Paludan, Johansen Mikkel Willum
Department for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Nursing, ZHAW School of Health Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Jun;31(4):553-571. doi: 10.1177/09697330231200568. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
BACKGROUND: Minimal research has been done to determine how well European nursing students understand the core principles of academic integrity and how often they deviate from good academic practice. AIM: The aim of this study was to find out what educational needs nursing students have in terms of academic integrity. RESEARCH DESIGN: A quantitative cross-sectional study in the form of a survey of nursing students was conducted via questionnaire in the fall of 2020. PARTICIPANTS: The sample was composed of 79 students in the BScN and MScN programs at Zürich University of Applied Sciences. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: An application for a non-competence clearance was approved by the Ethics Committee in Zurich (BASEC No. Req-2020-00868). The survey was anonymous, and informed consent was obtained prior to participation. RESULTS: The participants had a high level of confidence in their own knowledge but were in many cases unable to correctly identify clear-cut examples of misconduct and to differentiate them from questionable practices. About 13% of the participants admitted that during their university education they had copied shorter passages from other sources into their own text without marking them as quotes. CONCLUSIONS: The study documents extensive knowledge gaps among nursing students regarding both academic misconduct and questionable practices and indicates a need for improved academic integrity training.
背景:关于欧洲护理专业学生对学术诚信核心原则的理解程度以及他们偏离良好学术规范的频率,相关研究极少。 目的:本研究旨在了解护理专业学生在学术诚信方面有哪些教育需求。 研究设计:2020年秋季通过问卷调查对护理专业学生进行了定量横断面研究。 参与者:样本由苏黎世应用科学大学护理学学士和硕士项目的79名学生组成。 伦理考量:向苏黎世伦理委员会提交的无能力证明申请获得批准(BASEC编号:Req-2020-00868)。调查为匿名形式,参与前已获得知情同意。 结果:参与者对自己的知识水平有很高的信心,但在很多情况下,他们无法正确识别明显的不当行为示例,也无法将其与有问题的行为区分开来。约13%的参与者承认,在大学学习期间,他们曾将其他来源的较短段落抄入自己的文本而未标注为引用。 结论:该研究记录了护理专业学生在学术不当行为和有问题行为方面存在广泛的知识差距,并表明需要加强学术诚信培训。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018-3-2
Nurs Ethics. 2020-11
Nurs Ethics. 2018-5-21
Nurs Ethics. 2017-9-11
Nurs Ethics. 2019-12-12
Nurse Educ Today. 2019-3-20
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2024-11-15
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020-9
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018-5
Nurse Educ Today. 2018-3-2
Nurse Educ Today. 2017-3
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017-2
J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 2014