Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
J Anim Sci. 2018 Feb 15;96(1):35-55. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx072.
Animal mortality is indicative of animal health and welfare standards, which are of growing concern to the agricultural industry. The objective of the present study was to ascertain risk factors associated with mortality at multiple life stages in pasture-based, seasonal-calving dairy and beef herds. Males and females were stratified into seven life stages based on age (0 to 2 d, 3 to 7 d, 8 to 30 d, 31 to 182 d, 183 to 365 d, 366 to 730 d, and 731 to 1,095 d) whereas females with ≥1 calving event were further stratified into five life stages based on cow parity number (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Mortality was defined as whether an animal died during each life stage; only animals that either survived the entire duration or died during a life stage were considered. The data, following edits, consisted of 4,404,122 records from 1,358,712 animals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the logit of the probability of mortality in each life stage separately. The odds of a young animal (i.e., aged ≤ 1,095 d) dying was generally greater if veterinary assistance was required at their birth relative to no assistance (odds ratio [OR]: 3.10 to 31.85), if the animal was a twin relative to a singleton (OR: 1.46 to 2.31) or if the animal was male relative to female (OR: 1.14 to 6.15). Moreover, the odds of a cow (i.e., females with ≥1 calving event) dying were greater when she required veterinary assistance at calving (OR: 2.69 to 7.55) compared with a cow that did not require any assistance, if she produced twin relative to singleton progeny (OR: 1.59 to 2.03) or male relative to female progeny (OR: 1.09 to 1.20). Additionally, the odds of a first or second parity cow dying when she herself had received veterinary assistance at birth were only 0.63 to 0.66 times that of a cow that was provided no assistance at birth. For both young animals and cows, the odds of dying generally increased with herd size, whereas animals residing in expanding herds had lower odds of dying. Results from the present study indicate that the risk factors associated with mortality in pasture-based, seasonal-calving herds are similar to those reported in literature in confinement, nonseasonal-calving herds. Moreover, the present study identifies that these risk factors are similar in both dairy and beef herds, yet the magnitude of the association often differs and also changes with life stage.
动物死亡率是动物健康和福利水平的指标,这越来越受到农业产业的关注。本研究的目的是确定在基于牧场、季节性产犊的奶牛和肉牛群中多个生命阶段与死亡率相关的风险因素。雄性和雌性动物根据年龄(0 至 2 天、3 至 7 天、8 至 30 天、31 至 182 天、183 至 365 天、366 至 730 天和 731 至 1,095 天)分为七个生命阶段,而有≥1 次产犊事件的雌性动物则根据牛的胎次(1、2、3、4 和 5)进一步分为五个生命阶段。死亡率定义为动物在每个生命阶段是否死亡;只有在整个期间存活或在某个生命阶段死亡的动物才被考虑。经过编辑后,数据包括来自 1,358,712 头动物的 4,404,122 条记录。多变量逻辑回归用于分别估计每个生命阶段死亡率的对数几率。与没有任何帮助相比,如果动物在出生时需要兽医协助(优势比 [OR]:3.10 至 31.85),如果动物是双胞胎而不是单胎(OR:1.46 至 2.31),或者如果动物是雄性而不是雌性(OR:1.14 至 6.15),那么年轻动物(即年龄≤1,095 天)死亡的可能性通常更大。此外,如果奶牛(即有≥1 次产犊事件的雌性动物)在产犊时需要兽医协助(OR:2.69 至 7.55),则其死亡的可能性大于不需要任何帮助的奶牛,如果她产双胞胎而不是单胎(OR:1.59 至 2.03)或雄性而不是雌性后代(OR:1.09 至 1.20)。此外,当第一或第二胎奶牛在出生时接受兽医协助时,其死亡的可能性仅是未在出生时接受任何协助的奶牛的 0.63 至 0.66 倍。对于年轻动物和奶牛,死亡率通常随着畜群规模的增加而增加,而居住在扩张畜群中的动物死亡的可能性较低。本研究结果表明,基于牧场、季节性产犊的畜群中与死亡率相关的风险因素与文献中在封闭、非季节性产犊畜群中报告的风险因素相似。此外,本研究表明,这些风险因素在奶牛和肉牛群中相似,但关联的幅度往往不同,并且随着生命阶段的变化而变化。