a School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.
J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(18):2038-2044. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1434746. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Jump performance is considered an important factor in many sports. Thus, strategies such as weightlifting (WL) exercises, traditional resistance training (TRT) and plyometric training (PT) are effective at improving jump performance. However, it is not entirely clear which of these strategies can enable greater improvements on jump height. Thus, the purpose of the meta-analysis was to compare the improvements on countermovement jump (CMJ) performance between training methods which focus on WL exercises, TRT, and PT. Seven studies were included, of which one study performed both comparison. Therefore, four studies comparing WL exercises vs. TRT (total n = 78) and four studies comparing WL exercises vs. PT (total n = 76). The results showed greater improvements on CMJ performance for WL exercises compared to TRT (ES: 0.72 ± 0.23; CI: 0.26, 1.19; P = 0.002; Δ % = 7.5 and 2.1, respectively). The comparison between WL exercises vs. PT revealed no significant difference between protocols (ES: 0.15 ± 0.23; CI: -0.30, 0.60; P = 0.518; Δ % = 8.8 and 8.1, respectively). In conclusion, WL exercises are superior to promote positive changes on CMJ performance compared to TRT; however, WL exercises and PT are equally effective at improving CMJ performance.
跳跃表现被认为是许多运动中的一个重要因素。因此,举重(WL)练习、传统阻力训练(TRT)和增强式训练(PT)等策略可有效提高跳跃表现。然而,目前尚不清楚这些策略中哪一种可以使跳跃高度的提高更为显著。因此,本次荟萃分析的目的是比较专注于 WL 练习、TRT 和 PT 的训练方法对反跳式跳跃(CMJ)表现的改善效果。共纳入 7 项研究,其中 1 项研究同时进行了比较。因此,有 4 项研究比较了 WL 练习与 TRT(总 n=78),还有 4 项研究比较了 WL 练习与 PT(总 n=76)。结果显示,与 TRT 相比,WL 练习对 CMJ 表现的改善更为显著(ES:0.72±0.23;CI:0.26,1.19;P=0.002;Δ%=7.5 和 2.1)。WL 练习与 PT 之间的比较显示,两种方案之间没有显著差异(ES:0.15±0.23;CI:-0.30,0.60;P=0.518;Δ%=8.8 和 8.1)。总之,与 TRT 相比,WL 练习更能促进 CMJ 表现的积极变化;然而,WL 练习和 PT 在提高 CMJ 表现方面同样有效。