Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4057-7.
Ramucirumab has recently proved to be effective for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Ascites and peritoneal metastasis are among the most common complications of AGC. However, there are few data on the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in patients with AGC with ascites. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in patients with AGC with ascites.
We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in patients with AGC with ascites in comparison with patients without ascites in a single institution from June 2015 to May 2016. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences evaluated using the Log-lank test. The differences in baseline characteristics and response rates of each ascites group were calculated for homogeneity by chi-square tests and for trends by Fisher's exact test.
Eighty-three patients were analyzed in this study. Ascites was detected in 40 patients, 26 patients (31%) had small to moderate ascites and 14 (17%) had massive ascites. The proportion of patients who started with a reduced dose of paclitaxel was higher for patients with massive ascites than others. The frequencies of any grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity were 51% in patients without ascites, 77% in patients with small to moderate ascites, and 71% in patients with massive ascites. The frequencies of common ramucirumab-related adverse events were also not significantly different among ascites groups, however one patient had a tumor hemorrhage, and one patient had a gastrointestinal perforation. PFS and OS were shorter in patients with massive ascites than in patients with small or moderate ascites or patients without ascites.
The use of paclitaxel and ramucirumab in patients with AGC with large amounts of ascites was tolerable with adequate dose modification. However, we should pay attention to the risks of ramucirumab-related toxicity in patients with bleeding tumors or intestinal stenosis.
雷莫芦单抗最近被证明对晚期或复发性胃癌(AGC)有效。腹水和腹膜转移是 AGC 最常见的并发症之一。然而,关于紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗治疗伴有腹水的 AGC 患者的安全性和疗效的数据很少。本回顾性研究的目的是评估紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗治疗伴有腹水的 AGC 患者的安全性和疗效。
我们在单中心回顾性评估了 2015 年 6 月至 2016 年 5 月紫杉醇联合雷莫芦单抗治疗伴有腹水的 AGC 患者的安全性和疗效,并与无腹水的患者进行比较。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),采用 Log-rank 检验进行差异评估。采用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切概率法检验各组腹水患者的基线特征和缓解率的差异。
本研究共分析了 83 例患者。40 例患者检测到腹水,26 例(31%)患者腹水为少量至中等量,14 例(17%)患者腹水为大量。大量腹水患者紫杉醇起始剂量降低的比例高于其他患者。无腹水、少量至中等量腹水和大量腹水患者的任何 3 级或 4 级血液学毒性发生率分别为 51%、77%和 71%。常见雷莫芦单抗相关不良事件的发生率在腹水组之间也无显著差异,但有 1 例患者发生肿瘤出血,1 例患者发生胃肠道穿孔。大量腹水患者的 PFS 和 OS 短于少量至中等量腹水或无腹水患者。
对于大量腹水的 AGC 患者,使用紫杉醇和雷莫芦单抗是可以耐受的,且需要进行充分的剂量调整。然而,我们应该注意雷莫芦单抗相关毒性在出血性肿瘤或肠道狭窄患者中的风险。