School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Hai Dian District Shuangyushu Community Health Service Center, Beijing, China.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 6;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01335-2.
OPTION is a scale used to evaluate shared decision making (SDM) in health care from an observer's perspective; however, to date, there is no simplified Chinese version of this scale.
This study aims to produce a simplified Chinese version of the OPTION scale and to test its psychometric properties.
One rater observed and audio-recorded consultations between general practitioners (GPs) and chronically ill patients in a Beijing community health service center (CHSC) from May to June 2019. Meanwhile, demographic data of the patients and GPs were collected via information forms. Two raters assessed inter- and intra-rater reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Cohen's Kappa values. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α value. Concurrent was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
A total of 209 consultations were recorded and evaluated. As concerns inter-rater reliability, the ICC of the OPTION was 0.859 on the total score level, with Cohen's weighted k ranging from 0.376 (item 5) to 0.649 (item 2) on the single item level. With regard to intra-rater reliability, the ICC was 0.945 on the total score level, with Cohen's weighted k ranging from 0.469 (item 5) to 0.883 (item1) on the single item level. Cronbach's α value of all 5 items amounted to 0.746. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between OPTION and OPTION for Chinese versions was 0.660.
The simplified Chinese version of the OPTION scale, developed using stringent translation procedures, demonstrated satisfactory psychometric characteristics. Specifically, inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were excellent, while criterion validity was moderate. The simplified Chinese version of the OPTION scale can be implemented in clinical settings to evaluate SDM of treatment during consultations between GPs and chronically ill patients.
OPTION 量表用于从观察者的角度评估医疗保健中的共享决策(SDM);然而,迄今为止,该量表尚无简化中文版本。
本研究旨在制作 OPTION 量表的简化中文版,并检验其心理测量学特性。
一名评估者于 2019 年 5 月至 6 月在北京市社区卫生服务中心(CHSC)观察并录制全科医生(GP)与慢性病患者之间的咨询过程。同时,通过信息表收集患者和 GP 的人口统计学数据。两名评估者通过计算组内相关系数(ICC)和加权 Cohen's Kappa 值来评估组内和组间信度。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's α 值评估。同时效度通过 Spearman 秩相关系数计算。
共记录和评估了 209 次咨询。关于组间信度,OPTION 的 ICC 在总分水平上为 0.859,在单项水平上,Cohen's 加权 k 值范围从 0.376(项目 5)到 0.649(项目 2)。关于组内信度,OPTION 的 ICC 在总分水平上为 0.945,在单项水平上,Cohen's 加权 k 值范围从 0.469(项目 5)到 0.883(项目 1)。所有 5 个项目的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.746。OPTION 简化中文版与 OPTION 英文版的 Spearman 秩相关系数为 0.660。
使用严格的翻译程序开发的 OPTION 量表简化中文版具有满意的心理测量学特征。具体来说,组内和组间信度极好,而同时效度为中等。GP 与慢性病患者咨询中治疗的 SDM 可使用 OPTION 量表简化中文版在临床环境中进行评估。