Suppr超能文献

危地马拉高地获取和使用避孕措施的障碍:计划生育自我效能量表的编制

Barriers to accessing and using contraception in highland Guatemala: the development of a family planning self-efficacy scale.

作者信息

Richardson Emma, Allison Kenneth R, Gesink Dionne, Berry Albert

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.

Public Health Ontario.

出版信息

Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Apr 27;7:77-87. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S95674. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Understanding the persistent inequalities in the prevalence rates of family planning and unmet need for family planning between indigenous and nonindigenous women in Guatemala requires localized explorations of the specific barriers faced by indigenous women. Based on social cognitive theory, elicitation interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of 16 young women, aged 20-24 years, married or in union, from the rural districts of Patzún, Chimaltenango, Guatemala. Content analysis was carried out using the constant-comparison method to identify the major themes. Based on this qualitative study, the following barriers are incorporated into the development of a self-efficacy scale: lack of knowledge about and availability of methods, fear of side effects and infertility, husbands being against family planning (and related fears of marital problems and abandonment), pressure from in-laws and the community, and the belief that using contraception is a sin. This is the first evidence-informed self-efficacy scale developed with young adult, indigenous women that addresses the issue of family planning in Latin America.

摘要

要理解危地马拉土著妇女与非土著妇女在计划生育普及率和未满足的计划生育需求方面持续存在的不平等现象,需要对土著妇女面临的具体障碍进行本地化探究。基于社会认知理论,对来自危地马拉奇马尔特南戈省帕楚恩农村地区的16名年龄在20 - 24岁、已婚或有伴侣的年轻女性进行了有目的抽样的启发式访谈。采用持续比较法进行内容分析以确定主要主题。基于这项定性研究,以下障碍被纳入自我效能量表的开发中:对避孕方法缺乏了解和获取途径、对副作用和不孕的恐惧、丈夫反对计划生育(以及对婚姻问题和被抛弃的相关恐惧)、来自姻亲和社区的压力,以及认为使用避孕措施是一种罪过的观念。这是首个为拉丁美洲年轻成年土著妇女开发的、基于证据的自我效能量表,该量表解决了计划生育问题。

相似文献

1
Barriers to accessing and using contraception in highland Guatemala: the development of a family planning self-efficacy scale.
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Apr 27;7:77-87. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S95674. eCollection 2016.
3
"When you least expect, this happens, it's already growing": Problematizing the definition of unmet need for family planning.
Open Access J Contracept. 2019 May 29;10:7-18. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S184909. eCollection 2019.
4
Contraceptive use and fertility in Guatemala.
Stud Fam Plann. 1985 Sep-Oct;16(5):279-88.
5
Motivations and Constraints to Family Planning: A Qualitative Study in Rwanda's Southern Kayonza District.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 May 13;3(2):242-54. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00198.
6
[Use of contraceptives and fertility in Panama].
Perspect Int Planif Fam. 1987(Spec No):6-11.
7
Survey report: Guatemala.
Popul Today. 1988 Sep;16(9):5.
8
Family Planning in the Context of Latin America's Universal Health Coverage Agenda.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):382-398. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00057. Print 2017 Sep 27.
10
Side-Effects and Social Norms Influencing Family Planning Use in Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(59):222-229.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in women: the Turkish validity and reliability study.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 May 6;26:e36. doi: 10.1017/S146342362500026X.
4
Validation of the Fertility Norms Scale and Association with Fertility Intention and Contraceptive Use in India.
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):39-61. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12227. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
Understanding the rise in traditional contraceptive methods use in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01547-y.
6
Indigenous Women's Perspectives on Contraception in Rural Guatemala.
Pract Anthropol. 2022 Summer;44(3):20-29. doi: 10.17730/0888-4552.44.3.20. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Measuring women's agency in family planning: the conceptual and structural factors in the way.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2062161. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2062161.
10
Insights Into Provider Bias in Family Planning from a Novel Shared Decision Making Based Counseling Initiative in Rural, Indigenous Guatemala.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Mar 31;8(1):10-17. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00377. Print 2020 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic inequality in Guatemalan women's use of modern reproductive health care.
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Jun;38(2):99-108. doi: 10.1363/3809912.
3
Contraceptive self-efficacy and contraceptive knowledge of Hong Kong Chinese women with unplanned pregnancy.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Sep;18(17):2416-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02829.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
4
Early childbearing in Guatemala: a continuing challenge.
Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst). 2006 Sep(5):1-20.
5
Internal migration and contraceptive knowledge and use in Guatemala.
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006 Sep;32(3):146-53. doi: 10.1363/3214606.
6
Migration and the diffusion of modern contraceptive knowledge and use in rural Guatemala.
Stud Fam Plann. 2005 Dec;36(4):277-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2005.00070.x.
7
Diversity in family planning use among ethnic groups in Guatemala.
J Biosoc Sci. 2005 May;37(3):301-17. doi: 10.1017/s0021932004006650.
8
The contraceptive self-efficacy scale: analysis in four samples.
J Youth Adolesc. 1998 Dec;27(6):773-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1022865900546.
9
Access as a factor in differential contraceptive use between Mayans and ladinos in Guatemala.
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Jun;17(2):167-77. doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.2.167.
10
Whatever happened to qualitative description?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验