Suppr超能文献

检索练习提高评估复杂生理学信息的能力。

Retrieval practice enhances the ability to evaluate complex physiology information.

机构信息

Department of Health and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2018 May;52(5):513-525. doi: 10.1111/medu.13503. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many investigations have shown that retrieval practice enhances the recall of different types of information, including both medical and physiological, but the effects of the strategy on higher-order thinking, such as evaluation, are less clear. The primary aim of this study was to compare how effectively retrieval practice and repeated studying (i.e. reading) strategies facilitated the evaluation of two research articles that advocated dissimilar conclusions. A secondary aim was to determine if that comparison was affected by using those same strategies to first learn important contextual information about the articles.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to learn three texts that provided background information about the research articles either by studying them four consecutive times (Text-S) or by studying and then retrieving them two consecutive times (Text-R). Half of both the Text-S and Text-R groups were then randomly assigned to learn two physiology research articles by studying them four consecutive times (Article-S) and the other half learned them by studying and then retrieving them two consecutive times (Article-R). Participants then completed two assessments: the first tested their ability to critique the research articles and the second tested their recall of the background texts.

RESULTS

On the article critique assessment, the Article-R groups' mean scores of 33.7 ± 4.7% and 35.4 ± 4.5% (Text-R then Article-R group and Text-S then Article-R group, respectively) were both significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the two Article-S mean scores of 19.5 ± 4.4% and 21.7 ± 2.9% (Text-S then Article-S group and Text-R then Article-S group, respectively). There was no difference between the two Article-R groups on the article critique assessment, indicating those scores weren't affected by the different contextual learning strategies.

CONCLUSION

Retrieval practice promoted superior critical evaluation of the research articles, and the results also indicated the strategy enhanced the recall of background information.

摘要

目的

许多研究表明,检索练习可以增强对不同类型信息的回忆,包括医学和生理学信息,但该策略对高阶思维(如评估)的影响尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较检索练习和重复学习(即阅读)策略在评估两篇提倡不同结论的研究文章时的有效性。次要目的是确定使用相同的策略首先学习有关文章的重要背景信息是否会影响这种比较。

方法

参与者被随机分配通过连续学习四次(Text-S)或先学习再连续学习两次(Text-R)来学习三篇提供研究文章背景信息的文章。Text-S 和 Text-R 组的一半被随机分配通过连续学习四次(Article-S)学习两篇生理学研究文章,另一半则通过先学习再连续学习两次(Article-R)学习。然后,参与者完成两项评估:第一项评估测试他们对研究文章的批判性评价能力,第二项评估测试他们对背景文本的回忆能力。

结果

在文章评论评估中,Article-R 组的平均得分为 33.7±4.7%和 35.4±4.5%(分别为 Text-R 然后 Article-R 组和 Text-S 然后 Article-R 组),均显著高于(p<0.05)两个 Article-S 组的平均得分 19.5±4.4%和 21.7±2.9%(分别为 Text-S 然后 Article-S 组和 Text-R 然后 Article-S 组)。在文章评论评估中,两个 Article-R 组之间没有差异,表明分数不受不同背景学习策略的影响。

结论

检索练习促进了对研究文章的批判性评价,结果还表明该策略增强了对背景信息的回忆。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验