Suppr超能文献

不同场所开放式腕管松解术的直接成本比较

Direct Cost Comparison of Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Different Venues.

作者信息

Carr Logan W, Morrow Brad, Michelotti Brett, Hauck Randy M

机构信息

1 Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):462-465. doi: 10.1177/1558944718755476. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

The increased efficiency and cost savings have led many surgeons to move their practice away from the traditional operating room (OR) or outpatient surgery center (OSC) and into the clinic setting. With the cost of health care continuing to rise, the venue with the lowest cost should be utilized. We performed a direct cost analysis of a single surgeon performing an open carpal tunnel release in the OR, OSC, and clinic. Four treatment groups were prospectively studied: the hospital OR with monitored anesthesia care (OR-MAC), OSC with MAC (OSC-MAC), OSC with local anesthesia (OSC-local), and clinic with local anesthesia (clinic). To determine direct costs, a detailed inventory was recorded including the weight and disposal of medical waste. Indirect costs were not included. Five cases in each treatment group were prospectively recorded. Average direct costs were OR ($213.75), OSC-MAC ($102.79), OSC-local ($55.66), and clinic ($31.71). The average weight of surgical waste, in descending order, was the OR (4.78 kg), OSC-MAC (2.78 kg), OSC-local (2.6 kg), and the clinic (0.65 kg). Using analysis of variance, the clinic's direct costs and surgical waste were significantly less than any other setting ( < .005). The direct costs of an open carpal tunnel release were nearly 2 times more expensive in the OSC compared with the clinic and almost 7 times more expensive in the OR. Open carpal tunnel release is more cost-effective and generates less medical waste when performed in the clinic versus all other surgical venues.

摘要

效率的提高和成本的节省促使许多外科医生将他们的业务从传统手术室(OR)或门诊手术中心(OSC)转移到诊所环境中。随着医疗保健成本持续上升,应利用成本最低的场所。我们对一名外科医生在手术室、门诊手术中心和诊所进行开放性腕管松解术进行了直接成本分析。前瞻性研究了四个治疗组:接受监护麻醉护理的医院手术室(OR-MAC)、接受MAC的门诊手术中心(OSC-MAC)、接受局部麻醉的门诊手术中心(OSC-局部)和接受局部麻醉的诊所(诊所)。为了确定直接成本,记录了详细的清单,包括医疗废物的重量和处理情况。不包括间接成本。前瞻性记录每个治疗组的5例病例。平均直接成本分别为手术室(213.75美元)、门诊手术中心-MAC(102.79美元)、门诊手术中心-局部(55.66美元)和诊所(31.71美元)。手术废物的平均重量从高到低依次为手术室(4.78千克)、门诊手术中心-MAC(2.78千克)、门诊手术中心-局部(2.6千克)和诊所(0.65千克)。使用方差分析,诊所的直接成本和手术废物明显低于任何其他环境(<0.005)。与诊所相比,门诊手术中心进行开放性腕管松解术的直接成本几乎高出2倍,而在手术室则几乎高出7倍。与所有其他手术场所相比,在诊所进行开放性腕管松解术更具成本效益且产生的医疗废物更少。

相似文献

7
Our Surgical Experience: Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Surgery.我们的手术经验:开放式与内镜下腕管手术
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Sep;43(9):853-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
From wide awake surgery to office surgery.从清醒手术到门诊手术。
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 22;17(2):100192. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100192. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Interventions to Reduce Surgical Waste Burden: A Systematic Review.减轻手术废弃物负担的干预措施:一项系统综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 21;12(8):e6085. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006085. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

2
Environmentalism in surgical practice.外科实践中的环保主义。
Curr Probl Surg. 2016 Apr;53(4):165-205. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery.清醒状态下手部手术中的微创麻醉
Hand Clin. 2014 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验