Suppr超能文献

记忆自动影响的情境特异性

Context specificity of automatic influences of memory.

作者信息

Smith Steven M, Handy Justin D, Hernandez Alan, Jacoby Larry L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University.

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1501-1513. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000523. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

It has often been shown that intentional recollection is influenced by context manipulations, such as context reinstatement (e.g., Smith, 2013; Smith & Vela, 2001), but whether or not automatic retrieval (e.g., Jacoby, 1991) is likewise context dependent remains an open question. Here, we present two experiments that examined effects of context manipulations on indirect measures of memory. The first experiment tested anagram completion, and the second experiment used word fragment completion to test effects of context reinstatement; both experiments found reinstatement effects. To address potential problems of explicit contamination, we also asked participants if they were aware of the priming manipulations. Separating participants according to their test awareness showed effects of context manipulations for both aware and unaware participants. A greater effect size was found for aware participants only in Experiment 1, in which participants had enough time on each test trial for recollection to be used. We conclude that context reinstatement does affect automatic retrieval. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

研究多次表明,诸如情境恢复(例如,史密斯,2013年;史密斯和韦拉,2001年)等情境操纵会影响有意回忆,但自动提取(例如,雅可比,1991年)是否同样依赖情境仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在此,我们呈现了两项实验,检验情境操纵对记忆间接测量指标的影响。第一个实验测试了字谜完成任务,第二个实验使用单词片段完成任务来测试情境恢复的效果;两项实验均发现了恢复效果。为了解决显性污染的潜在问题,我们还询问了参与者是否意识到启动操纵。根据参与者的测试意识进行分组,结果显示情境操纵对有意识和无意识的参与者均有影响。仅在实验1中,有意识的参与者的效应量更大,在该实验中,参与者在每次测试试验中有足够的时间进行回忆。我们得出结论,情境恢复确实会影响自动提取。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018年美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验