• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于调整数据以允许考生选择的新的项目反应理论模型。

A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice.

作者信息

Pena Carolina Silva, Costa Marcelo Azevedo, Braga Oliveira Rivert Paulo

机构信息

Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Pró-Reitoria de Graduação, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191600. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191600
PMID:29389996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5794135/
Abstract

In a typical questionnaire testing situation, examinees are not allowed to choose which items they answer because of a technical issue in obtaining satisfactory statistical estimates of examinee ability and item difficulty. This paper introduces a new item response theory (IRT) model that incorporates information from a novel representation of questionnaire data using network analysis. Three scenarios in which examinees select a subset of items were simulated. In the first scenario, the assumptions required to apply the standard Rasch model are met, thus establishing a reference for parameter accuracy. The second and third scenarios include five increasing levels of violating those assumptions. The results show substantial improvements over the standard model in item parameter recovery. Furthermore, the accuracy was closer to the reference in almost every evaluated scenario. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal to obtain satisfactory IRT statistical estimates in the last two scenarios.

摘要

在典型的问卷测试情境中,由于在获得关于考生能力和试题难度的满意统计估计值方面存在技术问题,考生不被允许选择他们要回答的题目。本文介绍了一种新的项目反应理论(IRT)模型,该模型使用网络分析,将来自问卷数据新表示形式的信息纳入其中。模拟了考生选择部分题目的三种情境。在第一种情境中,满足了应用标准拉施模型所需的假设,从而为参数准确性建立了一个参考。第二和第三种情境包括违反这些假设的五个逐渐增加的程度。结果表明,在项目参数恢复方面,与标准模型相比有显著改进。此外,在几乎每个评估情境中,准确性都更接近参考值。据我们所知,这是在最后两种情境中获得满意的IRT统计估计值的首个提议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/09aa0ecf53de/pone.0191600.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/e1d422293ccc/pone.0191600.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/6f450ba810d2/pone.0191600.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/4f0cd97a80cc/pone.0191600.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/d810b345039e/pone.0191600.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/3531c3d37098/pone.0191600.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/c782bcf2e276/pone.0191600.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/09aa0ecf53de/pone.0191600.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/e1d422293ccc/pone.0191600.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/6f450ba810d2/pone.0191600.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/4f0cd97a80cc/pone.0191600.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/d810b345039e/pone.0191600.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/3531c3d37098/pone.0191600.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/c782bcf2e276/pone.0191600.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf17/5794135/09aa0ecf53de/pone.0191600.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A new item response theory model to adjust data allowing examinee choice.一种用于调整数据以允许考生选择的新的项目反应理论模型。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191600. eCollection 2018.
2
Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.用于考生选择项目中选择效应的非忽略缺失项目反应理论模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Nov;70(3):499-524. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12097. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
3
Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.具有评分者效应的考生自选项目的项目反应理论建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Sep;43(6):435-448. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798667. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.项目反应理论在高风险药学评估中的应用。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Sep;14(9):1206-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.研究项目参数漂移对具有混合分布的项目反应理论模型的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 24;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00255. eCollection 2016.
6
Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch model.采用 Rasch 模型对医学生麻醉学考试项目进行统计分析。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;74(3):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.01.027. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
7
Item analysis for the written test of Taiwanese board certification examination in anaesthesiology using the Rasch model.采用 Rasch 模型分析台湾麻醉科专科医师甄试笔试测验项目。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;104(6):717-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq097. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
8
How Does Calibration Timing and Seasonality Affect Item Parameter Estimates?校准时间和季节性如何影响项目参数估计?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;76(3):508-527. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588947. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.用于分析标准化强迫选择人格项目的两种项目反应理论模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006 Nov;59(Pt 2):379-95. doi: 10.1348/000711005X64691.
10
Parameter Estimation Accuracy of the Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Model Under Multiple Assumption Violations.多重假设违背下努力调节项目反应理论模型的参数估计准确性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):569-594. doi: 10.1177/0013164420949896. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Item Response Theory Modeling for Examinee-selected Items with Rater Effect.具有评分者效应的考生自选项目的项目反应理论建模
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Sep;43(6):435-448. doi: 10.1177/0146621618798667. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.用于考生选择项目中选择效应的非忽略缺失项目反应理论模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Nov;70(3):499-524. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12097. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
2
Application of optimal designs to item calibration.最优设计在项目校准中的应用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e106747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106747. eCollection 2014.
3
Structural measures for multiplex networks.多重网络的结构度量
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Mar;89(3):032804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032804. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.迈向复杂网络中心性度量验证方法学。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e90283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090283. eCollection 2014.
5
What is the difference between missing completely at random and missing at random?完全随机缺失和随机缺失之间的区别是什么?
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1336-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu080. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
6
Optimal Bayesian Adaptive Design for Test-Item Calibration.用于测试项目校准的最优贝叶斯自适应设计
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):263-88. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9391-8. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
Statistical mechanics of multiplex networks: entropy and overlap.多重网络的统计力学:熵与重叠
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jun;87(6):062806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.062806. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.老年人与年轻人在乘法运算中的策略选择:运用选择/无选择法检验自适应策略选择模型的预测
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Mar;126(1):71-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.1.71.