• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Financial Incentives for Chronic Disease Management: Results and Limitations of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials With New York Medicaid Patients.慢性病管理的经济激励措施:两项针对纽约医疗补助患者的随机临床试验结果及局限性
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1537-1543. doi: 10.1177/0890117117753986. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Effect of Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives on Weight Loss Among Prediabetic New York Medicaid Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于过程和结果的财务激励对纽约医疗补助计划中糖尿病前期患者体重减轻的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Mar;33(3):372-380. doi: 10.1177/0890117118783594. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Financial Incentives for Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes: Lessons Learned From HI-PRAISE, an Observational Study and Randomized Controlled Trial.针对患有糖尿病的医疗补助受益者的经济激励措施:从HI-PRAISE中汲取的经验教训,一项观察性研究和随机对照试验
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1498-1501. doi: 10.1177/0890117117746335. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Medicaid Beneficiaries with Diabetes.一项针对医疗补助计划糖尿病受益人的经济激励随机对照试验。
Perm J. 2018;22:17-080. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-080.
5
The impact of financial incentives on utilization and outcomes of diabetes prevention programs among Medicaid managed care adults in New York state.经济激励措施对纽约州医疗补助管理式医疗成年人群中糖尿病预防项目的利用率及效果的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105960. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.医疗补助人群中糖尿病预防的经济激励措施:研究设计与基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Trial to Incentivise Adherence for Diabetes (TRIAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.激励糖尿病患者坚持治疗(TRIAD)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Nov 17;18(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2288-6.
8
Financial incentives for hypertension control: rationale and study design.高血压控制的经济激励措施:原理与研究设计。
Trials. 2020 Feb 3;21(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4051-7.
9
Impact of Financial Incentives on Service Use, Spending, and Health in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中经济激励对服务使用、支出和健康的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):875-886. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.025.
10
Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives to Improve Self-Management and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于流程和结果的财务激励措施对改善新加坡 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理和血糖控制的随机对照试验。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00491-y. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Approach To Guide Research And Policy At The Intersection Of Income, Food, Nutrition, And Health.一种在收入、食物、营养与健康交叉领域指导研究和政策的新方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Apr;44(4):384-390. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01346.
2
Systematic Review Examining the Behavior Change Techniques in Medication Adherence Intervention Studies Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.系统评价考察了 2 型糖尿病患者药物依从性干预研究中的行为改变技术。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Mar 12;58(4):229-241. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae001.
3
Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease.改善心血管疾病患者的药物依从性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024 Jun;21(6):417-429. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00972-1. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
5
Study design of BETTER-BP: Behavioral economics trial to enhance regulation of blood pressure.BETTER-BP研究设计:增强血压调控的行为经济学试验。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2022 Oct 31;15:200156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2022.200156. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Interventions for Adherence Improvement in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Expert Consensus Statement.心血管疾病一级预防中提高依从性的干预措施:专家共识声明
Korean Circ J. 2022 Jan;52(1):1-33. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0226.
7
A Digital Health Intervention (SweetGoals) for Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Trial.一项针对 1 型糖尿病青年成年人的数字健康干预措施(SweetGoals):析因随机试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 23;10(2):e27109. doi: 10.2196/27109.
8
Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.氟维司群半量联合阿那曲唑作为激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌一线治疗:成本效果分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 30;10(8):e036107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036107.
9
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.以患者为中心的行为经济学干预对高度弱势群体高血压控制的影响:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
Brief Report: Durability of the Effect of Financial Incentives on HIV Viral Load Suppression and Continuity in Care: HPTN 065 Study.简要报告:经济激励对 HIV 病毒载量抑制和护理连续性效果的持久性:HPTN 065 研究。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Jul 1;81(3):300-303. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001927.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Process- and Outcome-Based Financial Incentives on Weight Loss Among Prediabetic New York Medicaid Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于过程和结果的财务激励对纽约医疗补助计划中糖尿病前期患者体重减轻的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Mar;33(3):372-380. doi: 10.1177/0890117118783594. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
2
Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update.美国成年人的多种慢性疾病:2012 年更新。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 17;11:E62. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130389.
3
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).2014 年成人高血压管理的循证指南:第八届联合国家委员会(JNC 8)任命的专家组报告。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
4
Medicaid incentive programs to encourage healthy behavior show mixed results to date and should be studied and improved.截至目前,旨在鼓励健康行为的医疗补助激励计划显示出了混合的结果,这些计划应该进行研究和改进。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):497-507. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0431.
5
A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes.糖尿病治疗依从性及其与临床和经济结局的关系综述。
Clin Ther. 2011 Jan;33(1):74-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.01.019.
6
P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients.患者绩效薪酬研究议程
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):206-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.206.
7
Hypertension treatment in a medicare population: adherence and systolic blood pressure control.医疗保险人群中的高血压治疗:依从性与收缩压控制
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):972-984. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.010.
8
A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders.基于代金券的物质使用障碍强化治疗的荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2006 Feb;101(2):192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x.
9
A randomized controlled trial of monetary incentives vs. outreach to enhance adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among injection drug users.一项关于货币激励与外展服务以提高注射吸毒者对乙肝疫苗系列接种依从性的随机对照试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Aug 20;71(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00074-7.
10
Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis.患者依从性与医疗治疗结果:一项荟萃分析。
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):794-811. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009.

慢性病管理的经济激励措施:两项针对纽约医疗补助患者的随机临床试验结果及局限性

Financial Incentives for Chronic Disease Management: Results and Limitations of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials With New York Medicaid Patients.

作者信息

VanEpps Eric M, Troxel Andrea B, Villamil Elizabeth, Saulsgiver Kathryn A, Zhu Jingsan, Chin Jo-Yu, Matson Jacqueline, Anarella Joseph, Roohan Patrick, Gesten Foster, Volpp Kevin G

机构信息

1 David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

2 Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1537-1543. doi: 10.1177/0890117117753986. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/0890117117753986
PMID:29390862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7256969/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify whether financial incentives promote improved disease management in Medicaid recipients diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes, respectively.

DESIGN

Four-group, multicenter, randomized clinical trials.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Between 2013 and 2016, New York State Medicaid managed care members diagnosed with hypertension (N = 920) or with diabetes (N = 959).

INTERVENTION

Participants in each 6-month trial were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 arms: (1) process incentives-earned by attending primary care visits and/or receiving prescription medication refills, (2) outcome incentives-earned by reducing systolic blood pressure (hypertension) or hemoglobin A (HbA; diabetes) levels, (3) combined process and outcome incentives, and (4) control (no incentives).

MEASURES

Systolic blood pressure (hypertension) and HbA (diabetes) levels, primary care visits, and medication prescription refills. Analysis and Results: At 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention arms and the control arm in the change in systolic blood pressure, P = .531. Similarly, there were no significant differences in blood glucose control (HbA) between the intervention arms and control after 6 months, P = .939. The majority of participants had acceptable systolic blood pressure (<140 mm Hg) or blood glucose (<8.0%) levels at baseline and throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

Financial incentives-regardless of whether they were delivered based on disease-relevant outcomes, process activities, or a combination of the two-have a negligible impact on health outcomes for Medicaid recipients diagnosed with either hypertension or diabetes in 2 studies in which, among other design and operational limitations, the majority of recipients had relatively well-controlled diseases at the time of enrollment.

摘要

目的

分别确定经济激励措施是否能促进医疗补助计划中被诊断患有高血压或糖尿病的受助者改善疾病管理。

设计

四组多中心随机临床试验。

地点和参与者

2013年至2016年期间,纽约州医疗补助计划管理式医疗的成员,其中被诊断患有高血压的有920人,患有糖尿病的有959人。

干预措施

在每项为期6个月的试验中,参与者被随机分配到4组中的一组:(1)过程激励——通过参加初级保健就诊和/或接受处方药续方获得;(2)结果激励——通过降低收缩压(高血压)或糖化血红蛋白(HbA;糖尿病)水平获得;(3)过程与结果相结合的激励;(4)对照组(无激励)。

测量指标

收缩压(高血压)和HbA(糖尿病)水平、初级保健就诊次数以及药物处方续方情况。分析与结果:6个月时,干预组和对照组在收缩压变化方面无统计学显著差异,P = 0.531。同样,6个月后干预组和对照组在血糖控制(HbA)方面也无显著差异,P = 0.939。大多数参与者在基线时以及整个研究过程中收缩压(<140 mmHg)或血糖(<8.0%)水平均可接受。

结论

在两项研究中,无论经济激励措施是基于与疾病相关的结果、过程活动还是两者结合来实施,对于被诊断患有高血压或糖尿病的医疗补助计划受助者的健康结果影响都微乎其微。在这两项研究中,除了其他设计和操作上的局限性外,大多数受助者在入组时疾病控制情况相对良好。