University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.
College of Business, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jul;57(3):610-629. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12242. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The introduction of new policies can evoke strong emotional reactions by the public. Yet, social-psychological research has paid little attention to affective determinants of individual-level policy acceptance. Building on recent theoretical and empirical advances around emotions and decision-making, we evaluate how people's trust and integral emotions function as important antecedents of cognitive evaluations, and subsequent acceptance of policies. We test our hypotheses within a sample of Irish citizens (n = 505), who were subject to the introduction of water charges in 2015. In line with our hypotheses, results show that general trust in government shapes emotions regarding water charges, which in turn, directly and via expected costs and benefits, influence policy acceptance. Additionally, we find that negative emotions have a larger direct effect on policy acceptance than positive emotions. Specifically, 'anger' was the main negative emotion that influenced the acceptance of the water charge. We conclude by discussing directions for future research around emotions and policy acceptance.
新政策的出台可能会引起公众强烈的情绪反应。然而,社会心理学研究很少关注个人层面政策接受的情感决定因素。基于情绪和决策方面的最新理论和实证进展,我们评估了人们的信任和整体情绪如何作为认知评估的重要前提,以及随后对政策的接受程度。我们在 2015 年接受水收费制度的爱尔兰公民样本(n=505)中检验了我们的假设。与我们的假设一致,结果表明,对政府的普遍信任塑造了对水收费的情绪,而这些情绪又通过预期的成本和收益直接或间接地影响政策的接受程度。此外,我们发现消极情绪对政策接受的直接影响大于积极情绪。具体来说,“愤怒”是影响水收费接受度的主要消极情绪。最后,我们讨论了围绕情绪和政策接受的未来研究方向。