Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):568-576.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Music therapy is demonstrated to be effective to relieve the agitation among people with dementia, but the comparative effectiveness of methods of music engagement for people with dementia is uncertain.
To evaluate the effects on cognitive functions and behavioral symptoms between interactive and receptive music therapies for people with dementia.
Prospective studies evaluating interactive and receptive music therapies were identified from the OVID databases, included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Supplementary search was conducted in Google Scholar. The primary outcome focused on cognitive function; the secondary outcomes were apathy, anxiety, depressive symptoms, agitation, and other behavioral problems. All outcomes were measured by the standard assessment tools. The heterogeneity of studies was examined, and the effects were pooled by meta-analysis. Quality of studies and risk of bias were assessed.
Thirty-eight trials involving 1418 participants with dementia were included. The mean age ranged from 75 to 90 years, and the percentage of male participants ranged from 6% to 83%. No significant difference was found between participants receiving interactive or receptive music therapy and usual care in cognitive function; the mean difference (MD) of Mini-Mental State Examination was 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.34 to 1.69], and -0.15 (95% CI -0.55 to 0.25), respectively. Participants with receptive music therapy had significant decrease in agitation (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory: MD = -7.99, 95% CI -5.11 to -0.87) and behavioral problems (Neuropsychiatric Inventory: MD = -3.02 95% CI -5.90 to -0.15) compared to usual care, while no significant difference was found between interactive music therapy and usual care in behavioral problems and psychiatric symptoms.
This study demonstrated that receptive music therapy could reduce agitation, behavioral problems, and anxiety in older people with dementia, and appears to be more effective than interactive music therapy. It is easy and convenient to implement receptive music therapy; therefore, we recommended the use of receptive music therapy in nursing homes, day care centers, and client homes.
音乐疗法已被证明能有效缓解痴呆患者的激越症状,但用于痴呆患者的互动式和接受式音乐疗法的比较效果尚不确定。
评估互动式和接受式音乐疗法对痴呆患者认知功能和行为症状的影响。
从 OVID 数据库(包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL)中检索评价互动式和接受式音乐疗法的前瞻性研究。在 Google Scholar 中进行了补充检索。主要结局指标为认知功能;次要结局指标为淡漠、焦虑、抑郁症状、激越和其他行为问题。所有结局指标均采用标准评估工具进行测量。对研究的异质性进行了检验,并采用荟萃分析汇总效应。评估了研究的质量和偏倚风险。
共纳入 38 项涉及 1418 例痴呆患者的试验。参与者的平均年龄为 7590 岁,男性参与者比例为 6%83%。与接受常规护理相比,接受互动式或接受式音乐疗法的患者在认知功能方面无显著差异;简易精神状态检查的平均差值(MD)分别为 0.18(95%置信区间 [CI]:-1.34 至 1.69)和-0.15(95% CI:-0.55 至 0.25)。接受接受式音乐疗法的患者激越(Cohen-Mansfield 激越量表:MD=-7.99,95% CI:-5.11 至-0.87)和行为问题(神经精神问卷:MD=-3.02,95% CI:-5.90 至-0.15)显著减少,而与常规护理相比,接受互动式音乐疗法的患者在行为问题和精神症状方面无显著差异。
本研究表明,接受式音乐疗法可降低痴呆老年人的激越、行为问题和焦虑,且似乎比互动式音乐疗法更有效。接受式音乐疗法简便易行;因此,我们建议在养老院、日托中心和客户家中使用接受式音乐疗法。