Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Wesley Mission Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):1519-1528. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14287. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
To determine whether differences in care practices and demographics between two long-term aged care facilities affected the incidence of residents' skin wounds.
A retrospective analysis of care plans and clinical outcomes was conducted for a 6-month period in 2016 at two aged care facilities, N = 39 Home 1 and N = 45 Home 2. Skin tears, pressure injuries and usual care practices and associated health demographics were recorded.
Over the 6-month period, 84 residents were found to have a total of 206 aged care acquired skin wounds (skin tears, pressure injuries, haematomas, rashes, infections). The frequency of skin tears or total wounds did not differ between the homes. Several factors were identified that influenced the skin wounds. A reduction in skin tears was associated with the use of heel protectors and antiembolic stockings, whilst a diagnosis of vascular dementia was associated with increased prevalence of skin wounds. Pressure injuries were significantly higher at Home 2. Increased use of strategies to moderate-risk activities, such as tray tables and bed rails, and impaired cognitive function were associated with higher pressure injury prevalence.
A number of care factors and health demographics influenced the rate of skin wounds. A holistic approach to skin management is needed.
Practices, such as repositioning and skin hygiene, are well known to reduce the incidence of pressure injuries and skin tears; however, there are other care practices that take place in homes as part of usual care that also impact skin wounds that have been largely ignored. This study highlights those care practices, as well as resident characteristics and comorbidities that may increase the risk of skin wounds, requiring further monitoring/mitigating strategies.
确定两个长期养老院之间护理实践和人口统计学差异是否会影响居民皮肤伤口的发生率。
对 2016 年在两个养老院进行的为期 6 个月的护理计划和临床结果进行回顾性分析,N=39 家庭 1 和 N=45 家庭 2。记录皮肤撕裂、压力性损伤和常规护理实践以及相关健康人口统计学数据。
在 6 个月期间,发现 84 名居民共有 206 例老年获得性皮肤伤口(皮肤撕裂、压力性损伤、血肿、皮疹、感染)。家庭之间皮肤撕裂或总伤口的频率没有差异。确定了一些影响皮肤伤口的因素。使用足跟保护器和抗血栓袜可减少皮肤撕裂,而血管性痴呆诊断与皮肤伤口的患病率增加相关。家庭 2 的压力性损伤明显更高。中度风险活动(如托盘桌和床护栏)策略的使用增加以及认知功能受损与更高的压力性损伤患病率相关。
许多护理因素和健康人口统计学数据影响皮肤伤口的发生率。需要采取整体方法进行皮肤管理。
翻身和皮肤卫生等常规做法众所周知可降低压力性损伤和皮肤撕裂的发生率;然而,家庭中还有其他作为常规护理一部分的护理做法也会影响皮肤伤口,这些做法在很大程度上被忽视了。本研究强调了这些护理做法以及可能增加皮肤伤口风险的居民特征和合并症,需要进一步监测/缓解策略。