• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标杆管理如何激励奶农改进犊牛管理。

How benchmarking motivates farmers to improve dairy calf management.

机构信息

Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 248-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 248-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3323-3333. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13596. Epub 2018 Feb 4.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2017-13596
PMID:29397181
Abstract

Dairy calves often receive inadequate colostrum for successful transfer of passive immunity and inadequate milk to achieve their potential for growth and avoid hunger, but little is known about what motivates farmers to improve calf management around these concerns. Our aim was to assess if and how access to benchmarking reports, providing data on calf performance and peer comparison, would change the ways in which farmers think about calves and their management. During our study, 18 dairy farmers in the lower Fraser Valley (British Columbia, Canada) each received 2 benchmark reports that conveyed information on transfer of immunity and calf growth for their own calves and for other farms in the region. Farmers were interviewed before and after receiving their benchmarking reports to gain an understanding of how they perceived access to information in the reports. We conducted qualitative analysis to identify major themes. Respondents generally saw having access to these data and peer comparisons favorably, in part because the reports provided evidence of how their calves were performing. Benchmarking encouraged farmers to make changes in their calf management by identifying areas needing attention and promoting discussion about best practices. We conclude that some management problems can be addressed by providing farmers better access to data that they can use to judge their success and inform changes.

摘要

奶牛犊牛通常无法获得充足的初乳来成功传递被动免疫,也无法获得充足的牛奶来实现其生长潜力并避免饥饿,但人们对促使农民关注这些问题并改善犊牛管理的因素知之甚少。我们的目的是评估提供犊牛表现和同行比较数据的基准报告是否以及如何改变农民对犊牛及其管理的看法。在研究过程中,不列颠哥伦比亚省弗雷泽河谷下游的 18 名奶牛场主每人收到了 2 份基准报告,这些报告提供了他们自己和该地区其他农场的犊牛免疫传递和生长情况的信息。在收到基准报告前后对农民进行了访谈,以了解他们如何看待报告中提供的信息。我们进行了定性分析以确定主要主题。受访者普遍对获得这些数据和同行比较持积极态度,部分原因是报告提供了他们的犊牛表现的证据。基准报告通过确定需要关注的领域并促进有关最佳实践的讨论,鼓励农民改变他们的犊牛管理。我们的结论是,通过提供农民更好地访问他们可以用来评估自己的成功并告知变革的数据,可以解决一些管理问题。

相似文献

1
How benchmarking motivates farmers to improve dairy calf management.标杆管理如何激励奶农改进犊牛管理。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3323-3333. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13596. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
2
How benchmarking promotes farmer and veterinarian cooperation to improve calf welfare.标杆管理如何促进农民和兽医合作以改善犊牛福利。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):702-713. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16338. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
How benchmarking motivates colostrum management practices on dairy farms: A realistic evaluation.如何通过基准测试激励奶牛场的初乳管理实践:现实评估。
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Dec;106(12):9200-9215. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23383. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Benchmarking passive transfer of immunity and growth in dairy calves.奶牛犊牛免疫被动转移与生长的基准测试
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3773-3782. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11800. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Dairy farmers' perspectives on providing cow-calf contact in the pasture-based systems of New Zealand.新西兰牧场系统中奶牛养殖者对提供牛犊接触的看法。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jan;105(1):453-467. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21047. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
6
Canadian dairy cattle veterinarian perspectives on calf welfare.加拿大奶牛兽医对犊牛福利的看法。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10303-10316. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14859. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Management practices for male calves on Canadian dairy farms.加拿大奶牛场雄性犊牛的管理措施
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6862-6871. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12750. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
A survey of management practices that influence calf welfare and an estimation of the annual calf mortality risk in pastured dairy herds in Uruguay.乌拉圭放牧奶牛场影响犊牛福利的管理措施调查及犊牛年死亡率估算。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Oct;103(10):9418-9429. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18177. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Canadian National Dairy Study: Heifer calf management.加拿大国家奶牛研究:后备牛犊管理。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10565-10579. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14680. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
10
A survey of dairy calf management practices in Canada that affect animal welfare.加拿大影响动物福利的奶牛犊管理措施调查。
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1307-15. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2429.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking hydration, navel health, and transfer of passive immunity in surplus dairy calves.评估多余奶牛犊牛的水合作用、脐部健康及被动免疫传递情况。
JDS Commun. 2025 Feb 20;6(3):383-388. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0693. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Use of conjoint analysis to weight biosecurity practices on pasture-based dairy farms to develop a novel audit tool-BioscoreDairy.运用联合分析对以牧场为基础的奶牛场生物安全措施进行加权,以开发一种新型审计工具——奶牛场生物评分(BioscoreDairy)。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 10;11:1462783. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1462783. eCollection 2024.
3
Can a Digital Application for Animal Welfare Self-Assessments by Farmers Help Improve the Welfare of Free-Range and Organic Pigs?
农民使用的动物福利自我评估数字应用程序能否帮助改善散养和有机猪的福利?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;14(23):3374. doi: 10.3390/ani14233374.
4
Canadian dairy farmer views about animal welfare.加拿大奶农对动物福利的看法。
Anim Welf. 2023 May 15;32:e38. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.32. eCollection 2023.
5
Monitoring biosecurity in poultry production: an overview of databases reporting biosecurity compliance from seven European countries.家禽生产中的生物安全监测:来自七个欧洲国家的生物安全合规报告数据库概述
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 15;10:1231377. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1231377. eCollection 2023.
6
A focus group study exploring dairy farmers' perspectives of cull cow management in Ontario, Canada.一项焦点小组研究,探讨加拿大安大略省奶农对淘汰奶牛管理的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 6;10:1189668. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1189668. eCollection 2023.
7
Calf care workers' attitudes and personality and their association with calf mortality in large-scale dairy farms.大型奶牛场犊牛护理人员的态度、性格及其与犊牛死亡率的关联
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 14;9:959548. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.959548. eCollection 2022.
8
Benchmarking calf health: Assessment tools for dairy herd health consultancy based on reference values from 730 German dairies with respect to seasonal, farm type, and herd size effects.犊牛健康基准:基于730家德国奶牛场参考值的奶牛群健康咨询评估工具,涉及季节、农场类型和牛群规模影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Sep 23;9:990798. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.990798. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of Housing and Management Factors on Selected Indicators of the Welfare Quality Protocol in Loose-Housed Dairy Cows.饲养与管理因素对散养奶牛福利质量协议选定指标的影响
Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 13;9(7):353. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9070353.
10
Benchmarking Based on Regularly Recorded Claw Health Data of Austrian Dairy Cattle for Implementation in the Cattle Data Network (RDV).基于奥地利奶牛定期记录的爪部健康数据进行基准测试,以在牛数据网络(RDV)中实施。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;12(7):808. doi: 10.3390/ani12070808.