• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农民使用的动物福利自我评估数字应用程序能否帮助改善散养和有机猪的福利?

Can a Digital Application for Animal Welfare Self-Assessments by Farmers Help Improve the Welfare of Free-Range and Organic Pigs?

作者信息

Graat Evelien A M, Vanden Hole Charlotte, Rodenburg T Bas, Giersberg Mona F, Tuyttens Frank A M

机构信息

Animal Sciences Unit, ILVO, 9090 Melle, Belgium.

Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;14(23):3374. doi: 10.3390/ani14233374.

DOI:10.3390/ani14233374
PMID:39682340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11639997/
Abstract

As part of the European Green Deal, the EU has recognised that there is a need to increase organic farming as well as improve animal welfare standards. The PIGLOW app was developed with these goals in mind and allows free-range and organic pig farmers to perform welfare assessments (WAs) of their pigs. The results of each WA contain automated feedback and benchmarking information. The objective of this two-year longitudinal study was to determine whether regular use of the app helps farmers improve pig welfare. Farmers ( = 12) were asked to perform 6 WAs for finisher pigs with the app. At the beginning and end of the study, a researcher visited each farm and performed a detailed WA to determine the welfare status of the pigs at both moments. Farmers ( = 11) also filled out surveys about their opinions on pig welfare and the PIGLOW app. The welfare results did not support that the use of the PIGLOW app had an overall effect on pig welfare, but suggested a positive effect on some specific welfare aspects. Farmers indicated that they found the app easy to use and found most of its elements very useful. However, when asked about the specific influence of the app on their opinions on pig welfare and the welfare of their pigs, they indicated that the app only had small effects. Responses suggested that the app could likely be more useful to new farmers who still have more to learn about animal welfare.

摘要

作为欧洲绿色协议的一部分,欧盟已认识到有必要增加有机农业并提高动物福利标准。PIGLOW应用程序就是基于这些目标开发的,它允许自由放养和有机养猪农民对其猪进行福利评估(WA)。每次福利评估的结果都包含自动反馈和基准信息。这项为期两年的纵向研究的目的是确定定期使用该应用程序是否有助于农民改善猪的福利。农民(n = 12)被要求使用该应用程序对育肥猪进行6次福利评估。在研究开始和结束时,一名研究人员走访了每个农场,并进行了详细的福利评估,以确定两个时间点猪的福利状况。农民(n = 11)还填写了关于他们对猪福利和PIGLOW应用程序看法的调查问卷。福利评估结果并不支持使用PIGLOW应用程序对猪福利有总体影响,但表明对某些特定福利方面有积极影响。农民表示他们发现该应用程序易于使用,并且发现其大部分元素非常有用。然而,当被问及该应用程序对他们对猪福利的看法和猪的福利的具体影响时,他们表示该应用程序的影响很小。调查结果表明,该应用程序可能对仍有更多动物福利知识需要学习的新农民更有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/cc25d20be15c/animals-14-03374-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/d4f931b8132c/animals-14-03374-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/b8efa57c1dde/animals-14-03374-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/0b55b472d837/animals-14-03374-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/677fd2dd9529/animals-14-03374-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/e69ed839251e/animals-14-03374-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/cc25d20be15c/animals-14-03374-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/d4f931b8132c/animals-14-03374-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/b8efa57c1dde/animals-14-03374-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/0b55b472d837/animals-14-03374-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/677fd2dd9529/animals-14-03374-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/e69ed839251e/animals-14-03374-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c006/11639997/cc25d20be15c/animals-14-03374-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Can a Digital Application for Animal Welfare Self-Assessments by Farmers Help Improve the Welfare of Free-Range and Organic Pigs?农民使用的动物福利自我评估数字应用程序能否帮助改善散养和有机猪的福利?
Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 23;14(23):3374. doi: 10.3390/ani14233374.
2
Consultation of pig farmers on the inclusion of some welfare outcome assessments within UK farm assurance.猪农对将一些福利结果评估纳入英国农场保证体系的咨询意见。
Vet Rec. 2010 May 29;166(22):678-80. doi: 10.1136/vr.c2893.
3
Human-animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming.人畜关系影响养猪业的饲养实践、动物福利和生产力。
Animal. 2021 Feb;15(2):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
My pigs are ok, why change? - animal welfare accounts of pig farmers.我的猪很好,为什么要改变?-养猪户的动物福利账目。
Animal. 2021 Mar;15(3):100154. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100154. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Barriers and drivers of farmers to provide outdoor access in pig farming systems: a qualitative study.农民在养猪系统中提供户外通道的障碍和驱动因素:一项定性研究。
Animal. 2024 May;18(5):101138. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101138. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Pig farmers' willingness to pay for management strategies to reduce aggression between pigs.养猪户对减少猪只间攻击性的管理策略的支付意愿。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224924. eCollection 2019.
7
Perceptions of farming stakeholders towards automating dairy cattle mobility and body condition scoring in farm assurance schemes.养殖利益相关者对农场保障计划中奶牛活动和身体状况自动评分的看法。
Animal. 2023 May;17(5):100786. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100786. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Understanding German Pig Farmers' Intentions to Design and Construct Pig Housing for the Improvement of Animal Welfare.了解德国养猪户为改善动物福利而设计和建造猪舍的意图。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;10(10):1760. doi: 10.3390/ani10101760.
9
'Would it sell more pork?' Pig farmers' perceptions of Real Welfare, the welfare outcome component of their farm assurance scheme.“这会增加猪肉销量吗?”——生猪养殖户对其农场保障计划中福利结果部分“真正福利”的看法。
Animal. 2019 Dec;13(12):2864-2875. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000946. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Evaluation of a simplified Herd Health and Welfare Index for benchmarking in pig herds.简化的 herd health and welfare index 在猪群基准评估中的应用。
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2020 Jun;48(3):156-164. doi: 10.1055/a-1161-9750. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Ration Planning Among German Organic Pig and Poultry Farmers.德国有机猪和家禽养殖户对配给计划的态度和信念
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;15(6):807. doi: 10.3390/ani15060807.

本文引用的文献

1
Introducing the Mellorater-The Five Domains Model in a Welfare Monitoring App for Animal Guardians.介绍梅洛拉特——动物守护者福利监测应用程序中的五领域模型。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;14(15):2172. doi: 10.3390/ani14152172.
2
Does the Implementation of an Animal Welfare Programme on a Farm Yield a Demonstrable Improvement in Fattening Pig Welfare?在农场实施动物福利计划是否能显著改善育肥猪的福利?
Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;12(23):3337. doi: 10.3390/ani12233337.
3
African swine fever and outdoor farming of pigs.非洲猪瘟与猪的户外养殖
EFSA J. 2021 Jun 9;19(6):e06639. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6639. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Acceptance and Feasibility of a Guideline for the Animal Welfare Assessment of Fattening Pigs from Farmers' Point of View.从农民角度看育肥猪动物福利评估指南的可接受性与可行性
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 19;10(4):711. doi: 10.3390/ani10040711.
5
Effects of three husbandry systems on health, welfare and productivity of organic pigs.三种饲养制度对有机猪健康、福利和生产性能的影响。
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):2025-2033. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000041. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
How benchmarking motivates farmers to improve dairy calf management.标杆管理如何激励奶农改进犊牛管理。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Apr;101(4):3323-3333. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13596. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
7
Benchmarking passive transfer of immunity and growth in dairy calves.奶牛犊牛免疫被动转移与生长的基准测试
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3773-3782. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11800. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Animal Health and Welfare Issues Facing Organic Production Systems.有机生产系统面临的动物健康与福利问题。
Animals (Basel). 2013 Oct 31;3(4):1021-35. doi: 10.3390/ani3041021.
9
The impact of different housing systems on health and welfare of grower and finisher pigs in Switzerland.瑞士不同饲养系统对生长育肥猪健康和福利的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Apr;68(1):49-61. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.01.004. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
10
Animal welfare assessment benchmarking as a tool for health and welfare planning in organic dairy herds.动物福利评估基准作为有机奶牛场健康与福利规划的工具
Vet Rec. 2004 Aug 21;155(8):237-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.155.8.237.