• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低频和高频皮层脑振荡反映了噪声中并行语音分离的不同机制。

Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.

作者信息

Yellamsetty Anusha, Bidelman Gavin M

机构信息

School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.

School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; Univeristy of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Memphis, TN, USA.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2018 Apr;361:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.006
PMID:29398142
Abstract

Parsing simultaneous speech requires listeners use pitch-guided segregation which can be affected by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the auditory scene. The interaction of these two cues may occur at multiple levels within the cortex. The aims of the current study were to assess the correspondence between oscillatory brain rhythms and determine how listeners exploit pitch and SNR cues to successfully segregate concurrent speech. We recorded electrical brain activity while participants heard double-vowel stimuli whose fundamental frequencies (F0s) differed by zero or four semitones (STs) presented in either clean or noise-degraded (+5 dB SNR) conditions. We found that behavioral identification was more accurate for vowel mixtures with larger pitch separations but F0 benefit interacted with noise. Time-frequency analysis decomposed the EEG into different spectrotemporal frequency bands. Low-frequency (θ, β) responses were elevated when speech did not contain pitch cues (0ST > 4ST) or was noisy, suggesting a correlate of increased listening effort and/or memory demands. Contrastively, γ power increments were observed for changes in both pitch (0ST > 4ST) and SNR (clean > noise), suggesting high-frequency bands carry information related to acoustic features and the quality of speech representations. Brain-behavior associations corroborated these effects; modulations in low-frequency rhythms predicted the speed of listeners' perceptual decisions with higher bands predicting identification accuracy. Results are consistent with the notion that neural oscillations reflect both automatic (pre-perceptual) and controlled (post-perceptual) mechanisms of speech processing that are largely divisible into high- and low-frequency bands of human brain rhythms.

摘要

解析同时出现的语音需要听众使用基于音高的分离方法,而这可能会受到听觉场景中信噪比(SNR)的影响。这两种线索的相互作用可能发生在大脑皮层的多个层面。本研究的目的是评估振荡性脑节律之间的对应关系,并确定听众如何利用音高和信噪比线索来成功分离同时出现的语音。我们记录了参与者在听到双元音刺激时的脑电活动,这些双元音刺激的基频(F0)相差零或四个半音(ST),呈现于纯净或噪声退化(+5 dB SNR)条件下。我们发现,对于音高间隔较大的元音混合体,行为识别更为准确,但F0优势与噪声存在相互作用。时频分析将脑电图分解为不同的频谱时间频段。当语音不包含音高线索(0ST > 4ST)或存在噪声时,低频(θ、β)反应增强,这表明与听力努力增加和/或记忆需求相关。相比之下,在音高(0ST > 4ST)和信噪比(纯净 > 噪声)变化时均观察到γ功率增加,这表明高频频段携带与声学特征和语音表征质量相关的信息。脑-行为关联证实了这些效应;低频节律的调制预测了听众感知决策的速度,而高频节律则预测了识别准确性。结果与以下观点一致,即神经振荡反映了语音处理的自动(知觉前)和受控(知觉后)机制,这些机制在很大程度上可分为人类脑节律的高频和低频频段。

相似文献

1
Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.低频和高频皮层脑振荡反映了噪声中并行语音分离的不同机制。
Hear Res. 2018 Apr;361:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.在同时出现的语音的皮质分离过程中,噪声和音高相互作用。
Hear Res. 2017 Aug;351:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 25.
3
Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.脑干对不利聆听条件下同时言语识别的相关性。
Brain Res. 2019 Jul 1;1714:182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.听觉皮层中音调表征的语言经验依赖性优势仅限于良好的信噪比。
Hear Res. 2017 Nov;355:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
5
Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.安静和噪声环境下音素辨别与句子层面言语可懂度的神经指标:一项P3研究
Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
6
Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.基频差异的语音分离:掩蔽类型的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):EL465-70. doi: 10.1121/1.4826152.
7
Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.基频差异的声音分离:谐波抵消的证据。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2855-65. doi: 10.1121/1.3643812.
8
Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.职业音乐家在噪声环境中增强的言语感知及皮质听觉诱发电位
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan;57(1):40-52. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1380850. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
9
Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.人类对语音音高的频率跟随反应的噪声容限。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):EL21-6. doi: 10.1121/1.3528775.
10
Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.正常听力者噪声编码谐音复合音的音强。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):EL398-404. doi: 10.1121/1.4757697.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing loss in juvenile rats leads to excessive play fighting and hyperactivity, mild cognitive deficits and altered neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex.幼年大鼠听力丧失会导致过度的打闹玩耍和多动、轻度认知缺陷以及前额叶皮质神经元活动改变。
Curr Res Neurobiol. 2024 Jan 29;6:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2024.100124. eCollection 2024.
2
Short- and long-term neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech.在同时学习语音的过程中,短期和长期神经可塑性相互作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad543.
3
Continuous dynamics in behavior reveal interactions between perceptual warping in categorization and speech-in-noise perception.
行为中的连续动态揭示了分类中的感知扭曲与噪声中语音感知之间的相互作用。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 1;17:1032369. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1032369. eCollection 2023.
4
Dichotic listening deficits in amblyaudia are characterized by aberrant neural oscillations in auditory cortex.在弱视中,双耳分听障碍的特征是听觉皮层中异常的神经振荡。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Sep;132(9):2152-2162. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
Differential contributions of synaptic and intrinsic inhibitory currents to speech segmentation via flexible phase-locking in neural oscillators.通过神经振荡器的灵活相位锁定,突触和内在抑制电流对语音分段的差异贡献。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Apr 14;17(4):e1008783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008783. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Speech categorization is better described by induced rather than evoked neural activity.诱发神经活动而非感知神经活动更能准确描述言语分类。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Mar;149(3):1644. doi: 10.1121/10.0003572.
7
Auditory-frontal Channeling in α and β Bands is Altered by Age-related Hearing Loss and Relates to Speech Perception in Noise.α和β波段的听觉-额叶通道因年龄相关性听力损失而改变,并与噪声中的言语感知相关。
Neuroscience. 2019 Dec 15;423:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.044. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.脑干对不利聆听条件下同时言语识别的相关性。
Brain Res. 2019 Jul 1;1714:182-192. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 20.