Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research (PCOR), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Evidence consistently shows poor outcomes in racial minorities, but there is limited understanding of differences that are explained by spatial variation. The goal of this analysis was to examine contribution of spatial patterns on disparities in diabetes outcomes in the Southeastern United States.
Data on 64,022 non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) veterans with diabetes living in Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina were analyzed for 2014. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was categorized as controlled (less than 8%) and uncontrolled (greater than or equal to 8%). Logistic regression was used to understand the additional explanatory capability of spatial random effects over covariates such as demographics, service connectedness, and comorbidities. Data aggregated at the county level were used to identify hotspots in distribution of uncontrolled HbA1c and tested using local Moran's I test.
Overall percent uncontrolled HbA1c was 36.5% (40.8% in NHB and 33.4% in NHW). In unadjusted analyses, NHB had 37% higher odds of uncontrolled HbA1c (odds ratio [OR]: 1.37, 95% confidence interval, 1.32, 1.41). After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, the OR decreased to 1.09 but remained significant (95% confidence interval, 1.05, 1.13). The OR further decreased after incorporating spatial effects (OR: 1.07, 95% confidence interval, 1.03, 1.11) but remained statistically significant. Hotspots of high HbA1c were detected, and spatial patterns differed across racial groups.
Differences in spatial patterns in glycemic control exists between NHB and NHW veterans with type 2 diabetes. Incorporating spatial effects helps explain more of the disparity in uncontrolled HbA1c than adjusting only for demographics and comorbidities, but significant differences in uncontrolled HbA1c remained.
有证据表明,少数族裔的预后较差,但对于可以用空间变异来解释的差异,人们的了解有限。本分析的目的是研究在美国东南部,糖尿病结局的差异与空间模式的关系。
对 2014 年在佐治亚州、阿拉巴马州和南卡罗来纳州居住的 64022 名非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)退伍军人的糖尿病数据进行分析。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分为控制良好(<8%)和控制不佳(≥8%)。使用逻辑回归了解空间随机效应对人口统计学、与服务相关因素和合并症等协变量的额外解释能力。使用县级汇总数据识别 HbA1c 控制不佳分布的热点,并使用局部 Moran's I 检验进行测试。
HbA1c 控制不佳的总体百分比为 36.5%(NHB 为 40.8%,NHW 为 33.4%)。在未调整的分析中,NHB 控制不佳的 HbA1c 比值比(OR)为 37%(OR:1.37,95%置信区间,1.32,1.41)。调整人口统计学和合并症后,OR 下降至 1.09,但仍有统计学意义(95%置信区间,1.05,1.13)。纳入空间效应后,OR 进一步下降(OR:1.07,95%置信区间,1.03,1.11),但仍具有统计学意义。检测到 HbA1c 高值的热点,且不同种族群体的空间模式存在差异。
2 型糖尿病退伍军人中,NHB 和 NHW 之间在血糖控制的空间模式上存在差异。纳入空间效应有助于解释 HbA1c 控制不佳的差异,比仅调整人口统计学和合并症更有解释力,但 HbA1c 控制不佳的显著差异仍然存在。