Walker Rebekah J, Strom Williams Joni, Egede Leonard E
Department of Medicine, Center for Health Disparities Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina.
Department of Medicine, Center for Health Disparities Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Am J Med Sci. 2016 Apr;351(4):366-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.008.
There is strong evidence that race, ethnicity and social determinants of health significantly influence outcomes for patients with diabetes. A better understanding of the mechanisms of these relationships or associations would improve development of cost-effective, culturally tailored programs for patients with diabetes.
This article reviews the current state of the literature on the influence of race and ethnicity and social determinants of health on process of care, quality of care and outcomes for diabetes, with particular emphasis on the rural South to give an overview of the state of the literature.
The literature review shows that racial or ethnic differences in the clinical outcomes for diabetes, including glycemic, blood pressure (BP) and lipid control, continue to persist. In addition, the literature review shows that the role of social determinants of health on outcomes, and the possible role these determinants play in disparities have largely been ignored. Psychosocial factors, such as self-efficacy, depression, social support and perceived stress, show consistent associations with self-care, quality of life and glycemic control. Neighborhood factors, such as food insecurity, social cohesion and neighborhood esthetics have been associated with glycemic control. Perceived discrimination has also been associated with self-care and the psychological component of quality of life.
Healthcare professionals need to be skilled in assessing social determinants of health and taking them into consideration in clinical care. In addition, more research is needed to identify the separate and combined influence of race and ethnicity and social determinants of health on process of care, quality of care and outcomes in diabetes, especially in the South, where the burden of disease is particularly high.
有充分证据表明,种族、族裔和健康的社会决定因素会显著影响糖尿病患者的治疗结果。更好地理解这些关系或关联的机制,将有助于开发出具有成本效益、适合不同文化背景的糖尿病患者项目。
本文回顾了关于种族、族裔和健康的社会决定因素对糖尿病护理过程、护理质量和治疗结果影响的文献现状,特别强调美国南部农村地区,以概述文献的整体情况。
文献综述表明,糖尿病临床治疗结果中的种族或族裔差异依然存在,包括血糖、血压(BP)和血脂控制方面。此外,文献综述显示,健康的社会决定因素对治疗结果的作用,以及这些决定因素在差异中可能扮演的角色在很大程度上被忽视了。心理社会因素,如自我效能感、抑郁、社会支持和感知压力,与自我护理、生活质量和血糖控制呈现出一致的关联。邻里因素,如粮食不安全、社会凝聚力和邻里环境美观度与血糖控制有关。感知到的歧视也与自我护理和生活质量的心理成分有关。
医疗保健专业人员需要具备评估健康的社会决定因素并在临床护理中加以考虑的技能。此外,需要更多研究来确定种族、族裔和健康的社会决定因素对糖尿病护理过程、护理质量和治疗结果的单独及综合影响,尤其是在疾病负担特别高的南部地区。