• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项具有全国代表性的混合模式研究中,延迟激励对回复率、回复模式、数据质量和样本偏差的影响。

The Effects of a Delayed Incentive on Response Rates, Response Mode, Data Quality, and Sample Bias in a Nationally Representative Mixed Mode Study.

作者信息

McGonagle Katherine A, Freedman Vicki A

机构信息

Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Field methods. 2017 Aug;29(3):221-237. doi: 10.1177/1525822X16671701. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1177/1525822X16671701
PMID:29398975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5791756/
Abstract

This article describes the results of an experiment designed to examine the impact of the use and amount of delayed unconditional incentives in a mixed mode (push to web) supplement on response rates, response mode, data quality, and sample bias. The supplement was administered to individuals who participate in the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the longest running national household panel in the world. After 10 weeks of data collection, individuals who had not yet completed the interview were sent a final survey request and randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: no incentive, US$5, and US$10. The impact of the incentives on response rates and mode, effects on data quality, and sample bias are described. The implications for the use of incentives in mixed mode surveys and directions for future research are discussed.

摘要

本文描述了一项实验的结果,该实验旨在研究在混合模式(推送至网络)补充调查中使用延迟无条件激励措施及其金额对回复率、回复模式、数据质量和样本偏差的影响。该补充调查针对参与美国收入动态面板研究的个体进行,这是世界上运行时间最长的全国家庭面板研究。在收集了10周数据后,尚未完成访谈的个体收到了最终调查请求,并被随机分配到三种处理条件之一:无激励、5美元激励和10美元激励。文中描述了激励措施对回复率和回复模式的影响、对数据质量的作用以及样本偏差情况。还讨论了在混合模式调查中使用激励措施的意义以及未来研究的方向。

相似文献

1
The Effects of a Delayed Incentive on Response Rates, Response Mode, Data Quality, and Sample Bias in a Nationally Representative Mixed Mode Study.在一项具有全国代表性的混合模式研究中,延迟激励对回复率、回复模式、数据质量和样本偏差的影响。
Field methods. 2017 Aug;29(3):221-237. doi: 10.1177/1525822X16671701. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
2
Use of a Targeted Sequential Mixed Mode Protocol in a Nationally Representative Panel Study.在一项具有全国代表性的面板研究中使用靶向顺序混合模式协议。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2018 Mar;6(1):98-121. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smx012. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
Switching from Telephone to Web-First Mixed-Mode Data Collection: Results from the Transition into Adulthood Supplement to the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics.从电话调查转向网络优先的混合模式数据收集:美国收入动态面板研究成年期补充调查转型的结果
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2022 Jul;185(3):933-954. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12840. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.基于人群的儿童和青少年健康访谈调查中数据收集模式与混合模式调查设计之间健康指标的模式等效性:方法学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 5;20(3):e64. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7802.
5
The Effectiveness of Incentives on Completion Rates, Data Quality, and Nonresponse Bias in a Probability-based Internet Panel Survey.基于概率的互联网面板调查中激励措施对完成率、数据质量和无应答偏差的有效性。
Field methods. 2020 Feb 18;32(2):159-179. doi: 10.1177/1525822x20901802.
6
Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.缩短失业救济期限以提高就业找到率:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-194. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.2. eCollection 2018.
7
Exploring Different Incentive Structures Among US Adults Who Use e-Cigarettes to Optimize Retention in Longitudinal Web-Based Surveys: Case Study.探索美国使用电子烟的成年人之间不同激励结构以优化纵向网络调查中的保留率:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 13;25:e49354. doi: 10.2196/49354.
8
Risks and rewards of using prepaid vs. postpaid incentive checks on a survey of physicians.使用预付与后付激励支票对医生进行调查的风险与回报。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0565-z.
9
Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.基于“监测未来”研究中的序列混合模式研究设计。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov 13;10(1):149-160. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smaa030. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Impact of Incentives on Physician Participation in Research Surveys: Randomized Experiment.激励措施对医生参与研究调查的影响:随机试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 14;8:e54343. doi: 10.2196/54343.

引用本文的文献

1
THE EFFECTS OF A TARGETED "EARLY BIRD" INCENTIVE STRATEGY ON RESPONSE RATES, FIELDWORK EFFORT, AND COSTS IN A NATIONAL PANEL STUDY.一项针对全国性面板研究中回应率、实地调查工作量及成本的“早起鸟”激励策略的效果
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2023 Nov;11(5):1032-1053. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smab042. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
3
Impact of different cover letter content and incentives on non-response bias in a sample of Veterans applying for Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits: a randomized, 3X2X2 factorial trial.不同求职信内容和激励措施对申请退伍军人事务部残疾福利的退伍军人样本中无应答偏倚的影响:一项随机、3X2X2 析因试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Mar 6;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01531-x.
4
The Effects of an Incentive Boost on Response Rates, Fieldwork Effort, and Costs across Two Waves of a Panel Study.激励提升对面板研究两波调查中的回应率、实地调查工作量及成本的影响
Methoden Daten Anal. 2020;14(2):241-250. doi: 10.12758/mda.2020.04.
5
Use of a Targeted Sequential Mixed Mode Protocol in a Nationally Representative Panel Study.在一项具有全国代表性的面板研究中使用靶向顺序混合模式协议。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2018 Mar;6(1):98-121. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smx012. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Effectiveness of a Time-Limited Incentive on Participation by Hard-to-Reach Respondents in a Panel Study.限时激励对难以接触到的受访者参与面板研究的有效性。
Field methods. 2017 Aug;29(3):238-251. doi: 10.1177/1525822X16670625. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study.面板研究中波间激励实验对联系人更新和生产结果的影响
J Off Stat. 2013;29(2):261-276. doi: 10.2478/jos-2013-0022.
2
The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Overview, Recent Innovations, and Potential for Life Course Research.收入动态跟踪调查:概述、近期创新及生命历程研究潜力
Longit Life Course Stud. 2012;3(2). doi: 10.14301/llcs.v3i2.188.
3
Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.全国性小组调查中的回应率。
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;645(1):60-87. doi: 10.1177/0002716212456363.
4
Incentives for college student participation in web-based substance use surveys.激励大学生参与基于网络的物质使用调查。
Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;38(3):1710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
5
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.提高邮寄问卷的回复率:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.