Cheng Bi-Heng, Chen Jian-Hua, Wang Gao-Hua
a Department of Obstetrics , Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University , Wuhan , China.
b Postdoctoral Circulation Station of Clinical Medicine, Wuhan University , Wuhan , China.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Jul;32(14):2295-2301. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1432038. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
To investigate the psychological predictors in Chinese multiparous pregnant women of advanced maternal age (AMA) for choosing aneuploidy screening or diagnostic testing.
A total of 84 pregnant women of AMA were consecutively enrolled from Renming Hospital, Wuhan University. All participants completed three questionnaires: Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Pregnancy Stress Rating Scale (PSRS). Demographic information and the choice of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) versus invasive prenatal diagnosis (PND) were also collected.
Thirty-seven chose to have invasive PND, and 47 chose NIPT. Choosing invasive PND, as opposed to NIPT, was associated with lower educational background (χ = -2.269, p = .023), higher SAS scores (47.62 ± 7.96 versus 44.21 ± 6.10, p = .029), and higher SDS scores (50.41 ± 9.80 versus 45.96 ± 11.05, p = .058). Logistic regression analysis further showed that the decisive predictors for invasive PND are SAS (OR =1.106, p = .008) scores, scores of factor 3 in PSRS and the stress from changes of shape and motility (OR =0.471, p = .038). Subgroup analysis showed that women with previous negative pregnancy experience had higher scores in factor 2-stress (guarantee of maternal-fetal safety: 1.96 ± 0.63 versus 2.49 ± 0.65, p = .004) and total PSRS scores (1.60 ± 0.4 versus 1.83 ± 0.31, p = .044) than those without. Additionally, unemployment post pregnancy was associated with marginally significant higher PSRS scores (p = .083).
The decision for invasive PND might be swayed by anxiety and attenuated by pregnancy stress originating from worry about changes in fetal shape and motility (measured by SAS and factor 3 score of PSRS, respectively).
探讨中国高龄经产妇选择非整倍体筛查或诊断性检测的心理预测因素。
连续纳入武汉大学人民医院的84例高龄孕妇。所有参与者均完成了三份问卷:zung自评焦虑量表(SAS)、zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)和妊娠压力评定量表(PSRS)。还收集了人口统计学信息以及无创产前检测(NIPT)与侵入性产前诊断(PND)的选择情况。
37例选择侵入性PND,47例选择NIPT。与选择NIPT相比,选择侵入性PND与较低教育背景(χ=-2.269,p=0.023)、较高SAS评分(47.62±7.96对44.21±6.10,p=0.029)和较高SDS评分(50.41±9.80对45.96±11.05,p=0.058)相关。Logistic回归分析进一步显示,侵入性PND的决定性预测因素是SAS(OR=1.106,p=0.008)评分、PSRS中因子3评分以及胎儿形状和活动变化带来的压力(OR=0.471,p=0.038)。亚组分析显示,既往有不良妊娠经历的女性在因子2-压力(母婴安全保障:1.96±0.63对2.49±0.65,p=0.004)和PSRS总分(1.60±0.4对1.83±0.31,p=0.044)方面得分高于无不良妊娠经历者。此外,产后失业与PSRS评分略高相关(p=0.083)。
侵入性PND的决策可能受焦虑影响,并因对胎儿形状和活动变化的担忧所产生的妊娠压力(分别由SAS和PSRS的因子3评分衡量)而减弱。