Chen Hong-Peng, Pan Wen-Jia, Tang Nan, Zhang Yuan, Yu Mei-Ling, Wu Xing-Da
School of Information Engineering, Guangdong Medical University, Xincheng Road, Dongguan 523808, China.
School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Xincheng Road, Dongguan 523808, China.
J Pharm Anal. 2016 Jun;6(3):203-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Two non-destructive instrumental methods, infrared spectroscopy (IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), were studied for quality evaluation of Lour. (). We obtained the IR spectra and XRD patterns of collected from different sources. The similarity of samples was analyzed by calculating the cosine coefficient. The cosine values were in the range of 0.83-0.90, indicating that the main components of samples are similar. Sample L1 and L6 showed a slightly lower similarity than that of L2, L3, L4, L5 detected by the two methods, which revealed that IR and XRD methods exhibited analogous detection ability for quality evaluation of . The two methods could be highly recommended as simple and rapid detection means for quality evaluation of .
研究了两种无损仪器方法,即红外光谱法(IR)和X射线衍射法(XRD),用于[药材名称](此处原文药材名称缺失)的质量评价。我们获得了从不同来源收集的[药材名称]的红外光谱和X射线衍射图谱。通过计算余弦系数分析样品的相似度。余弦值在0.83 - 0.90范围内,表明[药材名称]样品的主要成分相似。通过这两种方法检测发现,样品L1和L6的相似度略低于L2、L3、L4、L5,这表明红外光谱法和X射线衍射法在[药材名称]质量评价方面具有相似的检测能力。这两种方法作为[药材名称]质量评价的简单快速检测手段值得高度推荐。