• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉疾病家族史对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院临床结局的影响

Impact of family history of coronary artery disease on in-hospital clinical outcomes in ST-segment myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Agarwal Manyoo A, Garg Lohit, Lavie Carl J, Reed Guy L, Khouzam Rami N

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lehigh Valley Medical Center, Allentown, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(1):3. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.27.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2017.09.27
PMID:29404349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5787715/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with a family history of coronary artery disease (FHxCAD) are at increased risk for development of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the data on the influence of FHxCAD on in-hospital clinical outcomes post ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is limited. Hence, we evaluated the impact of FHxCAD on in-hospital clinical outcomes post STEMI in an unselected nationwide cohort.

METHODS

Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database [2003-2011] was used to compare differences in all-cause in-hospital mortality and adverse clinical events (cardiogenic shock, acute cerebrovascular events and use of intra-aortic balloon pump) between patients with and without FHxCAD.

RESULTS

A total of 2,123,492 STEMI admissions were identified, of which 7.4% (n=158,079) patients were with FHxCAD and 92.6% (n=1,965,413) were without FHxCAD. The FHxCAD group had lower in-hospital mortality [1.4% 8.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.44; P<0.001] when compared with no-FHxCAD group. They underwent a significantly higher number of coronary interventions, and were less likely to develop cardiogenic shock, acute cerebrovascular events and to require intra-aortic balloon pump during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

This large sample size study demonstrates that STEMI patients with FHxCAD had lower in-hospital mortality and adverse clinical events in comparison to patients with no-FHxCAD. Further research is warranted to determine whether the superior outcomes in FHxCAD patients with STEMI are related to differences in strategies related to diet, exercise, use of medications or coronary interventions.

摘要

背景

有冠状动脉疾病家族史(FHxCAD)的患者发生心肌梗死(MI)的风险增加。然而,关于FHxCAD对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后院内临床结局影响的数据有限。因此,我们在一个未经过筛选的全国性队列中评估了FHxCAD对STEMI后院内临床结局的影响。

方法

使用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库[2003 - 2011年]来比较有和没有FHxCAD的患者在全因院内死亡率和不良临床事件(心源性休克、急性脑血管事件和主动脉内球囊泵的使用)方面的差异。

结果

共确定了2123492例STEMI住院病例,其中7.4%(n = 158079)的患者有FHxCAD,92.6%(n = 1965413)的患者没有FHxCAD。与无FHxCAD组相比,FHxCAD组的院内死亡率较低[1.4%对8.1%;调整后的优势比(OR):0.42,95%置信区间(CI):0.41 - 0.44;P < 0.001]。他们接受冠状动脉介入治疗的次数显著更多,并且在住院期间发生心源性休克、急性脑血管事件以及需要使用主动脉内球囊泵的可能性较小。

结论

这项大样本量研究表明,与无FHxCAD的患者相比,有FHxCAD的STEMI患者院内死亡率和不良临床事件较低。有必要进一步研究以确定有FHxCAD的STEMI患者的较好结局是否与饮食、运动、药物使用或冠状动脉介入治疗相关策略的差异有关。

相似文献

1
Impact of family history of coronary artery disease on in-hospital clinical outcomes in ST-segment myocardial infarction.冠状动脉疾病家族史对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院临床结局的影响
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(1):3. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.27.
2
Impact of family history of coronary artery disease on clinical outcomes in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.冠心病家族史对Takotsubo心肌病临床结局的影响。
J Investig Med. 2022 Jul 18. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002186.
3
Influence of cardiogenic shock with or without the use of intra-aortic balloon pump on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.伴或不使用主动脉内球囊反搏的心源性休克对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2014 Dec 30;6:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2014.12.006. eCollection 2015 Mar 1.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock due to acute pump failure.急性泵衰竭导致心原性休克的 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Dec;7(8):743-754. doi: 10.1177/2048872616673535. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
5
Contemporary trends in cardiogenic shock: Incidence, intra-aortic balloon pump utilisation and outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.当代心源性休克趋势:来自伦敦心脏病发作组的发生率、主动脉内球囊泵使用情况和结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):16-27. doi: 10.1177/2048872617741735. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Among Older Patients With ST-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Angiographically Proven Coronary Artery Disease.经血管造影证实患有冠状动脉疾病的老年ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的短期和长期预后差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Sep;9(5):513-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002312. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR.根据心肌梗死分类的心源性休克患者的特征、治疗及预后差异:美国国家心血管数据注册(NCDR)报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):708-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000262. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
The impact of intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation on in-hospital mortality in patients presenting with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock.主动脉内球囊反搏对无心源性休克的前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡率的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):328-30. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Temporal Trends and Sex Differences in Revascularization and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Younger Adults in the United States.美国年轻成年人 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死血运重建和结局的时间趋势及性别差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 3;66(18):1961-1972. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.865.
10
Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Opioid Dependence: A National Inpatient Sample Study.阿片类药物依赖患者ST段抬高型心肌梗死的结局:一项全国住院患者样本研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):e64161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64161. eCollection 2024 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine-learning based risk prediction of in-hospital outcomes following STEMI: the STEMI-ML score.基于机器学习的ST段抬高型心肌梗死住院结局风险预测:ST段抬高型心肌梗死机器学习评分
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 10;11:1454321. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1454321. eCollection 2024.
2
Joint Association of Lipoprotein(a) and a Family History of Coronary Artery Disease with the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.载脂蛋白(a)与冠状动脉疾病家族史与慢性冠状动脉综合征患者心血管结局的联合关联。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):1319-1332. doi: 10.5551/jat.64693. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
3
Risk factors associated with contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者对比剂相关急性肾损伤相关的风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 28;13(6):e070561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070561.
4
Prognostic significance of positive family history in outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: Do we need to update our assumptions?阳性家族史对冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的预后意义:我们是否需要更新我们的假设?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Apr 27;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01836-4.
5
Significance of preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction in 5-year outcome after isolated CABG.孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年预后与术前左心室射血分数的意义。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 27;16(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01732-3.
6
Long non-coding RNA expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者外周血单个核细胞中的长链非编码RNA表达谱
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6813-6825. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3105.
7
Temporal Trends in Pregnancy-Associated Stroke and Its Outcomes Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.妊娠相关性卒中及其在妊娠高血压疾病患者中的结局的时间趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016182. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016182. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Relation Between Family History of Premature Coronary Artery Disease and the Risk of Death in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.早发冠状动脉疾病家族史与冠状动脉疾病患者死亡风险之间的关系
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
2
Socioeconomic Status and in-hospital Mortality of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Can Education and Occupation Serve as Preventive Measures?社会经济地位与急性冠状动脉综合征的院内死亡率:教育和职业能否作为预防措施?
Int J Prev Med. 2015 May 4;6:36. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.156266. eCollection 2015.
3
Outcomes and resource utilization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States: evidence for socioeconomic disparities.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗结果与资源利用情况:社会经济差异的证据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Nov 16;3(6):e001057. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001057.
4
Family history of premature cardiovascular disease: blood pressure control and long-term mortality outcomes in hypertensive patients.家族性早发心血管疾病史:高血压患者的血压控制与长期死亡率结局。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar;35(9):563-70. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht539. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
5
Impact of family history on the presentation and clinical outcomes of coronary heart disease: data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.家族史对冠心病临床表现和临床结局的影响:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册登记研究的数据。
Korean J Intern Med. 2013 Sep;28(5):547-56. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.5.547. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
6
Atherosclerotic risk factors and their association with hospital mortality among patients with first myocardial infarction (from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction).首次心肌梗死患者的动脉粥样硬化危险因素及其与住院死亡率的关系(来自心肌梗死国家注册登记研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Nov 1;110(9):1256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.025. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
7
Parental history and myocardial infarction risk across the world: the INTERHEART Study.全球范围内的父母病史与心肌梗死风险:INTERHEART研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;57(5):619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.054.
8
Association of socioeconomic status with functional capacity, heart rate recovery, and all-cause mortality.社会经济地位与功能能力、心率恢复及全因死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2006 Feb 15;295(7):784-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.7.784.
9
Family history of coronary artery disease and prognosis after first acute myocardial infarction in a national survey.一项全国性调查中首次急性心肌梗死后的冠状动脉疾病家族史与预后
Cardiology. 2004;102(3):140-6. doi: 10.1159/000080481. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
10
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.用于行政数据的共病测量方法。
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.