Harpaz David, Behar Solomon, Rozenman Yoseph, Boyko Valentina, Gottlieb Shmuel
Heart Institute, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Cardiology. 2004;102(3):140-6. doi: 10.1159/000080481. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
A positive family history (FH) of coronary artery disease (CAD) is considered an independent risk factor for developing CAD. However, the natural history, coronary angiographic findings and prognosis of patients with a positive FH developing first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not well defined. A cohort of 2,690 consecutive patients with first AMI from two prospective nationwide surveys conducted during 1996 and 1998 in all coronary care units operating in Israel was studied. Baseline characteristics, hospital course, management and outcome of 405 patients with first AMI and a positive FH were compared with 2,285 controls without a positive FH. Coronary angiograms of patients with and without a positive FH were reviewed and compared. Patients with a positive FH were younger (53 vs. 64 years), more often male, current smokers and patients with hyperlipidemia, but less often patients with diabetes or hypertension than patients without a positive FH. Patients with a positive FH developed heart failure during hospital stay less frequently. Thrombolytic therapy was similarly administered to both groups. During the hospital stay, coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting were more frequently performed in patients with a positive FH. The coronary anatomy and the extent of the CAD were similar in patients with and without a positive FH. Crude and covariate-adjusted mortality rates were significantly lower in patients with a positive FH than in patients without a positive FH on day 30 (2.2 vs. 9.6%, p < 0.001; odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.99) and at 1 year (3.5 vs. 14%, p < 0.001; hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.80). Patients with a positive FH developed their first AMI more than 1 decade earlier in comparison to those without such a history. The extent of their coronary disease is similar to the older patients without a positive FH. The better prognosis of patients with a positive FH is mostly explained by their younger age.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的阳性家族史(FH)被认为是发生CAD的一个独立危险因素。然而,FH阳性且首次发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者的自然病史、冠状动脉造影结果及预后尚不清楚。对1996年和1998年在以色列所有冠心病监护病房进行的两项全国性前瞻性调查中连续入选的2690例首次发生AMI的患者进行了研究。将405例首次发生AMI且FH阳性的患者的基线特征、住院过程、治疗及结局与2285例FH阴性的对照者进行比较。对FH阳性和阴性患者的冠状动脉造影进行回顾和比较。FH阳性患者比FH阴性患者更年轻(53岁对64岁),男性更多,当前吸烟者及高脂血症患者更多,但糖尿病或高血压患者更少。FH阳性患者住院期间发生心力衰竭的频率更低。两组溶栓治疗的应用相似。住院期间,FH阳性患者更常接受冠状动脉造影、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术。FH阳性和阴性患者的冠状动脉解剖结构及CAD范围相似。FH阳性患者在第30天(2.2%对9.6%,p<0.001;比值比0.50,95%可信区间0.22 - 0.99)和1年时(3.5%对14%,p<0.001;风险比0.58,95%可信区间0.42 - 0.80)的粗死亡率和经协变量调整后的死亡率显著低于FH阴性患者。与无此类病史的患者相比,FH阳性患者首次发生AMI的时间要早10多年。他们的冠状动脉疾病范围与无FH阳性的老年患者相似。FH阳性患者较好的预后主要归因于他们更年轻的年龄。