• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用扩散模型对Go/No-go任务中的个体差异进行建模。

Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.

作者信息

Ratcliff Roger, Huang-Pollock Cynthia, McKoon Gail

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University and The Ohio State University.

出版信息

Decision (Wash D C ). 2018 Jan;5(1):42-62. doi: 10.1037/dec0000065. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1037/dec0000065
PMID:29404378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5796558/
Abstract

The go/no-go task is one in which there are two choices, but the subject responds only to one of them, waiting out a time-out for the other choice. The task has a long history in psychology and modern applications in the clinical/neuropsychological domain. In this article we fit a diffusion model to both experimental and simulated data. The model is the same as the two-choice model and assumes that there are two decision boundaries and termination at one of them produces a response and at the other, the subject waits out the trial. In prior modeling, both two-choice and go/no-go data were fit simultaneously and only group data were fit. Here the model is fit to just go/no-go data for individual subjects. This allows analyses of individual differences which is important for clinical applications. First, we fit the standard two-choice model to two-choice data and fit the go/no-go model to RTs from one of the choices and accuracy from the two-choice data. Parameter values were similar between the models and had high correlations. The go/no-go model was also fit to data from a go/no-go version of the task with the same subjects as the two-choice task. A simulation study with ranges of parameter values that are obtained in practice showed similar parameter recovery between the two-choice and go/no-go models. Results show that a diffusion model with an implicit (no response) boundary can be fit to data with almost the same accuracy as fitting the two-choice model to two-choice data.

摘要

“是/否”任务是一种存在两种选择的任务,但受试者只对其中一种选择做出反应,而对另一种选择等待超时。该任务在心理学领域有着悠久的历史,在临床/神经心理学领域也有现代应用。在本文中,我们将扩散模型应用于实验数据和模拟数据。该模型与二选一模型相同,假设存在两个决策边界,在其中一个边界处终止会产生反应,而在另一个边界处,受试者等待试验结束。在之前的建模中,二选一数据和“是/否”数据是同时拟合的,并且只拟合了组数据。在这里,该模型仅适用于个体受试者的“是/否”数据。这使得对个体差异的分析成为可能,而这对于临床应用很重要。首先,我们将标准二选一模型应用于二选一数据,并将“是/否”模型应用于其中一个选择的反应时间以及二选一数据的准确性。模型之间的参数值相似且具有高度相关性。“是/否”模型也适用于与二选一任务相同受试者的“是/否”版本任务的数据。一项对实际获得的参数值范围进行的模拟研究表明,二选一模型和“是/否”模型之间的参数恢复情况相似。结果表明,一个具有隐式(无反应)边界的扩散模型能够以与将二选一模型应用于二选一数据几乎相同的精度拟合数据。

相似文献

1
Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.使用扩散模型对Go/No-go任务中的个体差异进行建模。
Decision (Wash D C ). 2018 Jan;5(1):42-62. doi: 10.1037/dec0000065. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
2
A model of the go/no-go task.一种停止信号任务模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):389-413. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389.
3
Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.
4
Advantage of the go/no-go task over the yes/no lexical decision task: ERP indexes of parameters in the diffusion model.Go/No-go 任务优于是/否词汇判断任务:扩散模型中的参数 ERP 指标。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):e0218451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218451. eCollection 2019.
5
On the Relation Between the (Censored) Shifted Wald and the Wiener Distribution as Measurement Models for Choice Response Times.关于(删失)移位沃尔德分布与维纳分布之间的关系作为选择反应时间的测量模型
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Mar;42(2):116-135. doi: 10.1177/0146621617710465. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects.模拟二选一强制选择任务:兼顾量级效应和差异效应。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun;103:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.强化学习中的选择规则——漂移扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1234-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y.
8
Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.错误等待:奖励的符号表征调节卷尾猴、学龄前儿童和成年人的跨期选择。
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):428-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
9
Robust and fast nonlinear optimization of diffusion MRI microstructure models.扩散磁共振成像微观结构模型的稳健快速非线性优化
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:82-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.064. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.亮度辨别任务中反应时间和准确性的扩散模型解释:拟合真实数据与无法拟合虚假但似真的数据
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):278-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03196283.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency of evidence accumulation as a formal model-based measure of task-general executive functioning in adolescents.作为青少年任务通用执行功能的一种基于形式模型的测量方法,证据积累效率。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1037/abn0001043.
2
Neurophysiology of Perceptual Decision-Making and Its Alterations in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.感知决策的神经生理学及其在注意力缺陷多动障碍中的改变
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 2;45(14):e0469242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0469-24.2025.
3
Lateral prefrontal theta oscillations causally drive a computational mechanism underlying conflict expectation and adaptation.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Diffusion Model to Explain Cognitive Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.使用扩散模型解释注意力缺陷多动障碍中的认知缺陷。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):57-68. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0151-y.
2
Evaluating the consequences of impaired monitoring of learned behavior in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a Bayesian hierarchical model of choice response time.使用选择反应时间的贝叶斯层次模型评估注意缺陷多动障碍中学习行为监测受损的后果。
Neuropsychology. 2016 May;30(4):502-15. doi: 10.1037/neu0000257. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.
外侧前额叶θ振荡因果驱动了冲突预期和适应的计算机制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 14;15(1):9858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54244-8.
4
Mapping computational cognitive profiles of aging to dissociable brain and sociodemographic factors.将衰老的计算认知概况映射到可分离的大脑和社会人口统计学因素。
NPJ Aging. 2024 Oct 31;10(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00171-3.
5
The Tweedledum and Tweedledee of dynamic decisions: Discriminating between diffusion decision and accumulator models.动态决策中的半斤八两:区分扩散决策模型和累加器模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):588-613. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02587-0. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
6
High stakes slow responding, but do not help overcome Pavlovian biases in humans.高风险反应慢,但无助于克服人类的巴甫洛夫偏见。
Learn Mem. 2024 Sep 16;31(8). doi: 10.1101/lm.054017.124. Print 2024 Aug.
7
Preadolescent externalizing and internalizing symptoms are differentially related to drift-diffusion model parameters and neural activation during a go/no-go task.青少年期的外化和内化症状与 Go/No-Go 任务中漂移-扩散模型参数和神经激活有差异相关。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:405-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.08.038. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
8
Hierarchical differences in the encoding of amplitude modulation in the subcortical auditory system of awake nonhuman primates.清醒非人类灵长类动物下丘脑中调制幅度编码的层次差异。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Sep 1;132(3):1098-1114. doi: 10.1152/jn.00329.2024. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
9
Direct serotonin release in humans shapes aversive learning and inhibition.人类中直接的血清素释放塑造了厌恶学习和抑制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 9;15(1):6617. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50394-x.
10
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhanced emotional inhibitory control via increasing intrinsic prefrontal couplings.经皮耳迷走神经刺激通过增加前额叶固有耦合增强情绪抑制控制。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;24(2):100462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100462. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.
4
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Modeling Response Times in the Go/No-Go Discrimination Task.在“是/否”辨别任务中对反应时间进行建模。
Cogsci. 2011;2011:1866-1871.
6
A diffusion modeling approach to understanding contextual cueing effects in children with ADHD.一种用于理解多动症儿童情境线索效应的扩散模型方法。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;55(12):1336-44. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12250. Epub 2014 May 3.
7
An information processing/associative learning account of behavioral disinhibition in externalizing psychopathology.外化型精神病理学中行为抑制缺失的信息加工/联想学习解释。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;22(2):122-32. doi: 10.1037/a0035166. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
8
Prepotent response inhibition and interference control in autism spectrum disorders: two meta-analyses.自闭症谱系障碍中的优势反应抑制和干扰控制:两项荟萃分析。
Autism Res. 2014 Aug;7(4):407-20. doi: 10.1002/aur.1369. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
9
Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework.运用扩散模型框架整合反应时和执行功能障碍。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;41(5):837-50. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9715-2.
10
Decomposing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related effects in response speed and variability.分解反应速度和变异性中的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)相关效应。
Neuropsychology. 2012 Nov;26(6):684-94. doi: 10.1037/a0029936.