• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.
2
Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.使用扩散模型对Go/No-go任务中的个体差异进行建模。
Decision (Wash D C ). 2018 Jan;5(1):42-62. doi: 10.1037/dec0000065. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
3
Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.估计扩散模型的参数:处理污染物反应时间和参数变异性的方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):438-81. doi: 10.3758/bf03196302.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.HDDM:在 Python 中对 Drift-Diffusion 模型进行层次贝叶斯估计。
Front Neuroinform. 2013 Aug 2;7:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014. eCollection 2013.
6
Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.参数和非参数总体方法:它们在分析临床数据集和两项蒙特卡罗模拟研究中的比较性能。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(4):365-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645040-00003.
7
Perceptual decision making: drift-diffusion model is equivalent to a Bayesian model.知觉决策:漂移-扩散模型等同于贝叶斯模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 26;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00102. eCollection 2014.
8
9
Comparing Eight Parameter Estimation Methods for the Ratcliff Diffusion Model Using Free Software.使用免费软件比较拉特克利夫扩散模型的八种参数估计方法
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 29;11:484737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.484737. eCollection 2020.
10
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior probability biases perceptual choices by modulating the accumulation rate, rather than the baseline, of decision evidence.先验概率通过调节决策证据的积累速率而非基线来影响感知选择。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Nov 18;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00338. eCollection 2024.
2
Linking attention bias to youth social anxiety and depression: Insights from computational modeling of the affective Posner task.将注意力偏差与青少年社交焦虑和抑郁联系起来:来自情感波森纳任务计算模型的见解。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Nov 1;388:119764. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119764. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Evaluating Risk and Benefit Sensitivity for Cognitive Treatments.评估认知治疗的风险和效益敏感性。
J Cogn Enhanc. 2025;9(2):214-229. doi: 10.1007/s41465-025-00319-3. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
4
Impulsive adolescents exhibit inefficient processing and a low decision threshold when decoding facial expressions of emotions.冲动型青少年在解读面部情绪表情时表现出处理效率低下和决策阈值较低的情况。
Psychol Med. 2025 Apr 2;55:e105. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725000595.
5
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Enhances Probabilistic Learning.经皮迷走神经刺激增强概率学习。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Mar;62(3):e70037. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70037.
6
Cross-modal congruency modulates evidence accumulation, not decision thresholds.跨模态一致性调节证据积累,而非决策阈值。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Feb 20;19:1513083. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1513083. eCollection 2025.
7
Impulsive adolescents exhibit inefficient processing and a low decision threshold when decoding facial expressions of emotions.冲动型青少年在解读面部情绪表情时表现出处理效率低下和决策阈值较低的特点。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 24:2024.10.24.619674. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.24.619674.
8
A drift diffusion model analysis of age-related impact on multisensory decision-making processes.年龄对多感觉决策过程影响的漂移扩散模型分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):14895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65549-5.
9
Cognitive reserve involves decision making and is associated with left parietal and hippocampal hypertrophy in neurodegeneration.认知储备涉及决策,与神经退行性变中的左顶叶和海马体肥大有关。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jun 18;7(1):741. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06416-x.
10
Modality-specific impacts of distractors on visual and auditory categorical decision-making: an evidence accumulation perspective.干扰因素对视觉和听觉分类决策的模态特异性影响:证据积累视角
Front Psychol. 2024 May 3;15:1380196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380196. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Aging and Predicting Inferences: A Diffusion Model Analysis.衰老与预测推理:扩散模型分析
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):240-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
2
Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.模拟计算能力方面反应时间和准确性的个体差异。
Cognition. 2015 Apr;137:115-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
3
The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014).扩散模型并非确定性增长模型:评琼斯和贾法罗夫(2014年)的文章
Psychol Rev. 2014 Oct;121(4):679-88. doi: 10.1037/a0037667.
4
Perceptual decision neurosciences - a model-based review.知觉决策神经科学——基于模型的综述。
Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 26;277:872-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.031. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
5
Aging and IQ effects on associative recognition and priming in item recognition.衰老和智商对项目识别中关联识别及启动效应的影响。
J Mem Lang. 2012 Apr;66(3):416-437. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.001.
6
The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.《野兔与乌龟》:强调速度会改变用于决策的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1226-43. doi: 10.1037/a0036801. Epub 2014 May 5.
7
Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.用扩散模型测量心理物理函数。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):870-88. doi: 10.1037/a0034954. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
Extending JAGS: a tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example).扩展 JAGS:向 JAGS 添加自定义分布的教程(以扩散模型为例)。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):15-28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0369-3.
9
HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python.HDDM:在 Python 中对 Drift-Diffusion 模型进行层次贝叶斯估计。
Front Neuroinform. 2013 Aug 2;7:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014. eCollection 2013.
10
Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework.运用扩散模型框架整合反应时和执行功能障碍。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;41(5):837-50. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9715-2.

决策的二择扩散模型中的个体差异与拟合方法

Individual Differences and Fitting Methods for the Two-Choice Diffusion Model of Decision Making.

作者信息

Ratcliff Roger, Childers Russ

机构信息

The Ohio State University.

出版信息

Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015. doi: 10.1037/dec0000030.

DOI:10.1037/dec0000030
PMID:26236754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4517692/
Abstract

Methods of fitting the diffusion model were examined with a focus on what the model can tell us about individual differences. Diffusion model parameters were obtained from the fits to data from two experiments and consistency of parameter values, individual differences, and practice effects were examined using different numbers of observations from each subject. Two issues were examined, first, what sizes of differences between groups can be obtained to distinguish between groups and second, what sizes of differences would be needed to find individual subjects that had a deficit relative to a control group. The parameter values from the experiments provided ranges that were used in a simulation study to examine recovery of individual differences. This study used several diffusion model fitting programs, fitting methods, and published packages. In a second simulation study, 64 sets of simulated data from each of 48 sets of parameter values (spanning the range of typical values obtained from fits to data) were fit with the different methods and biases and standard deviations in recovered model parameters were compared across methods. Finally, in a third simulation study, a comparison between a standard chi-square method and a hierarchical Bayesian method was performed. The results from these studies can be used as a starting point for selecting fitting methods and as a basis for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of using diffusion model analyses to examine individual differences in clinical, neuropsychological, and educational testing.

摘要

研究了扩散模型的拟合方法,重点关注该模型能告诉我们关于个体差异的哪些信息。扩散模型参数是通过对两个实验的数据拟合得到的,并使用来自每个受试者的不同数量的观测值来检验参数值的一致性、个体差异和练习效应。研究了两个问题,第一,为区分不同组,组间差异的大小需要达到多少;第二,要找出相对于对照组存在缺陷的个体受试者,需要多大的差异。实验中的参数值提供了范围,这些范围被用于模拟研究,以检验个体差异的恢复情况。这项研究使用了几个扩散模型拟合程序、拟合方法和已发表的软件包。在第二项模拟研究中,对48组参数值(涵盖从数据拟合中获得的典型值范围)中的每一组所产生的64组模拟数据,用不同方法进行拟合,并比较不同方法在恢复模型参数时的偏差和标准差。最后,在第三项模拟研究中,对标准卡方方法和分层贝叶斯方法进行了比较。这些研究的结果可作为选择拟合方法的起点,并作为理解使用扩散模型分析来检验临床、神经心理学和教育测试中的个体差异的优缺点的基础。