• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低强度与中等强度有氧及抗阻联合训练对老年女性身体成分、肌肉力量和功能表现的比较。

Comparisons of low-intensity versus moderate-intensity combined aerobic and resistance training on body composition, muscle strength, and functional performance in older women.

作者信息

Shiotsu Yoko, Yanagita Masahiko

机构信息

Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.

Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Menopause. 2018 Jun;25(6):668-675. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001060.

DOI:10.1097/GME.0000000000001060
PMID:29406427
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the effects of exercise order of combined aerobic and low- or moderate-intensity resistance training into the same session on body composition, functional performance, and muscle strength in healthy older women. Furthermore, this study compared the effects of different (low- vs moderate-) intensity combined training.

METHODS

A total of 60 healthy older women (age 61-81 y) were randomly assigned to five groups that performed aerobic exercise before low-intensity resistance training (AR-L, n = 12) or after resistance training (RA-L, n = 12), performed aerobic exercise before moderate-intensity resistance training (AR-M, n = 12) or after resistance training (RA-M, n = 12), or nonintervention control conditions (CON, n = 12). Body composition, functional performance, and muscle strength were evaluated before and after the 10-week training.

RESULTS

No effects of exercise order of combined aerobic and low- or moderate-intensity resistance training (AR-L vs RA-L, AR-M vs RA-M) were observed in body composition, functional performance, or muscle strength, whereas the effects of training intensity of combined training (AR-L vs AR-M, RA-L vs RA-M) were observed on functional performance. All combined trainings significantly increased muscle strength and gait ability (P < 0.01, respectively). Functional reach test significantly increased in the AR-M and RA-M groups (P < 0.01, respectively), and there were significant group differences between AR-L and AR-M (P = 0.002), RA-L and RA-M (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings suggest that combined aerobic and low- or moderate-intensity resistance training increases muscle strength and improves gait ability, regardless of the exercise order. Also, greater improvement in dynamic balance capacity, a risk factor associated with falling, is observed in moderate-intensity combined training.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在同一训练时段内,将有氧训练与低强度或中等强度抗阻训练相结合的运动顺序,对健康老年女性身体成分、功能表现和肌肉力量的影响。此外,本研究还比较了不同(低强度与中等强度)强度组合训练的效果。

方法

总共60名健康老年女性(年龄61 - 81岁)被随机分为五组,分别是在低强度抗阻训练前进行有氧运动(AR-L,n = 12)或在抗阻训练后进行有氧运动(RA-L,n = 12),在中等强度抗阻训练前进行有氧运动(AR-M,n = 12)或在抗阻训练后进行有氧运动(RA-M,n = 12),以及无干预的对照条件组(CON,n = 12)。在为期10周的训练前后,对身体成分、功能表现和肌肉力量进行评估。

结果

在身体成分、功能表现或肌肉力量方面,未观察到有氧训练与低强度或中等强度抗阻训练相结合的运动顺序(AR-L与RA-L,AR-M与RA-M)产生的影响,而在功能表现方面观察到了组合训练强度(AR-L与AR-M,RA-L与RA-M)的影响。所有组合训练均显著增加了肌肉力量和步态能力(P均<0.01)。功能性伸展测试在AR-M组和RA-M组中显著增加(P均<0.01),并且AR-L与AR-M之间(P = 0.002)、RA-L与RA-M之间(P = 0.014)存在显著的组间差异。

结论

初步研究结果表明,无论运动顺序如何,有氧训练与低强度或中等强度抗阻训练相结合均可增加肌肉力量并改善步态能力。此外,在中等强度组合训练中观察到与跌倒相关的危险因素——动态平衡能力有更大改善。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of low-intensity versus moderate-intensity combined aerobic and resistance training on body composition, muscle strength, and functional performance in older women.低强度与中等强度有氧及抗阻联合训练对老年女性身体成分、肌肉力量和功能表现的比较。
Menopause. 2018 Jun;25(6):668-675. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001060.
2
Effect of exercise order of combined aerobic and resistance training on arterial stiffness in older men.联合有氧和抗阻训练的运动顺序对老年男性动脉僵硬的影响。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Oct 1;111:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
3
Combination of body mass-based resistance training and high-intensity walking can improve both muscle size and V˙O peak in untrained older women.基于体重的阻力训练与高强度步行相结合,可以改善未经训练的老年女性的肌肉大小和最大摄氧量。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 May;17(5):779-784. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12786. Epub 2016 May 23.
4
Neuromuscular adaptations to water-based concurrent training in postmenopausal women: effects of intrasession exercise sequence.绝经后女性对水上同步训练的神经肌肉适应性:训练期间运动顺序的影响
Age (Dordr). 2015 Feb;37(1):9751. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9751-7. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
5
Comparison of time-matched aerobic, resistance, or concurrent exercise training in older adults.比较老年人的时间匹配的有氧、阻力或同时运动训练。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Nov;28(11):2272-2283. doi: 10.1111/sms.13254. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
Effects of intra-session exercise sequence during water-based concurrent training.水基协同训练中单次训练过程中运动顺序的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;35(1):41-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1345129. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Comparing exercise responses to aerobic plus resistance training between postmenopausal breast cancer survivors undergoing aromatase inhibitor therapy and healthy women.比较接受芳香化酶抑制剂治疗的绝经后乳腺癌幸存者和健康女性进行有氧加抗阻训练的运动反应。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(18):2175-2182. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1460877. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal fitness in adolescents with obesity: the HEARTY trial.有氧训练、抗阻训练或两者对肥胖青少年心肺和肌肉骨骼健康的影响:HEARTY试验
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Mar;41(3):255-65. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0413. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Comparative Effects of Vigorous-Intensity and Low-Intensity Blood Flow Restricted Cycle Training and Detraining on Muscle Mass, Strength, and Aerobic Capacity.高强度与低强度血流限制循环训练及停训对肌肉质量、力量和有氧能力的比较影响
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1453-61. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001218.
10
Effects of different strength training frequencies on maximum strength, body composition and functional capacity in healthy older individuals.不同强度训练频率对健康老年人最大力量、身体成分和功能能力的影响。
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Nov;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of resistance training intensity on body composition and nutritional intake among college women with overweight and obesity: a cluster randomized controlled trial.阻力训练强度对超重和肥胖女大学生身体成分及营养摄入的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1589036. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589036. eCollection 2025.
2
The physiological and physical benefits of two types of concurrent training: a randomized controlled trial.两种类型的同时训练的生理和身体益处:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00798-x.
3
Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.
中度阻力训练对患有肌肉减少症的老年人是否足够?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Nov 29;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4.
4
Restoring walking ability in older adults with arm-in-arm gait training: study protocol for the AAGaTT randomized controlled trial.使用牵手步态训练恢复老年人的步行能力:AAGaTT 随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 6;23(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04255-9.
5
Combined training prescriptions for improving cardiorespiratory fitness, physical fitness, body composition, and cardiometabolic risk factors in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.改善老年人心肺适能、身体素质、身体成分和心血管代谢危险因素的联合训练处方:对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Sci Sports. 2023 Feb 17. doi: 10.1016/j.scispo.2022.03.015.
6
Effects of concurrent training sequence on VO and lower limb strength performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同时训练顺序对最大摄氧量(VO)和下肢力量表现的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1072679. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1072679. eCollection 2023.
7
Influence of Resistance Training on Gait & Balance Parameters in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.抗阻训练对老年人步态和平衡参数的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041759.
8
Effects of Resistance Exercise on Balance Ability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.抗阻运动对平衡能力的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Life (Basel). 2020 Nov 15;10(11):284. doi: 10.3390/life10110284.