Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, England, United Kingdom.
Unilever Research and Development Port Sunlight, Quarry Road East, Bebington CH63 3JW, England, United Kingdom.
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
Implicit attentional processes are biased toward food-related stimuli, with the extent of that bias reflecting relative motivation to eat. These interactions have typically been investigated by comparisons between fasted and sated individuals. In this study, temporal changes in implicit attention to food were assessed in relation to natural, spontaneous changes in appetite occurring before and after an anticipated midday meal. Non-fasted adults performed an emotional blink of attention (EBA) task at intervals, before and after consuming preferred, pre-selected sandwiches to satiety. Participants were required to detect targets within a rapid visual stream, presented after task-irrelevant food (preferred or non-preferred sandwiches, or desserts) or non-food distractor images. All categories of food distractor preferentially captured attention even when appetite levels were low, but became more distracting as appetite increased preprandially, reducing task accuracy maximally as hunger peaked before lunch. Postprandially, attentional capture was markedly reduced for images of the specific sandwich type consumed and, to a lesser extent, for images of other sandwich types that had not been eaten. Attentional capture by images of desserts was unaffected by satiation. These findings support an important role of selective visual attention in the guidance of motivated behaviour. Naturalistic, meal-related changes in appetite are accompanied by changes in implicit attention to visual food stimuli that are easily detected using the EBA paradigm. Preprandial enhancement of attention capture by food cues likely reflects increases in the incentive motivational value of all food stimuli, perhaps providing an implicit index of wanting. Postprandial EBA responses confirm that satiation on a particular food results in relative inattention to that food, supporting an important attentional component in the operation of sensory-specific satiety.
内隐注意过程偏向于与食物相关的刺激,这种偏向的程度反映了相对的进食动机。这些相互作用通常通过比较禁食和饱腹个体来研究。在这项研究中,评估了与预期午餐前后自然发生的食欲变化相关的食物内隐注意力的时间变化。非禁食成年人在食用预先选择的、偏好的三明治至饱腹感之前和之后,以间隔时间执行情绪眨眼注意(EBA)任务。参与者需要在快速视觉流中检测目标,这些目标是在任务无关的食物(偏好或非偏好的三明治或甜点)或非食物分散注意力的图像之后呈现的。即使在食欲水平较低时,所有类别的食物分散注意力者都优先吸引注意力,但在餐前食欲增加时,它们变得更具分散注意力,在午餐前饥饿达到高峰时最大程度地降低任务准确性。餐后,对所消耗的特定三明治类型的图像的注意力捕获明显减少,对未食用的其他三明治类型的图像的注意力捕获程度也有所降低。对甜点图像的注意力捕获不受饱腹感的影响。这些发现支持选择性视觉注意在指导动机行为中的重要作用。与饮食相关的自然食欲变化伴随着对视觉食物刺激的内隐注意力的变化,使用 EBA 范式很容易检测到这些变化。食物线索对内隐注意力捕获的餐前增强可能反映了所有食物刺激的激励动机价值的增加,也许提供了一种隐性的想要指数。餐后 EBA 反应证实,特定食物的饱腹感会导致对该食物的相对不关注,这支持了感觉特异性饱腹感的重要注意力成分。