Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Utah, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Mar;125:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
We investigated how struggling adult readers make use of sentence context to facilitate word processing when comprehending spoken language, conditions under which print decoding is not a barrier to comprehension. Stimuli were strongly and weakly constraining sentences (as measured by cloze probability), which ended with the most expected word based on those constraints or an unexpected but plausible word. Community-dwelling adults with varying literacy skills listened to continuous speech while their EEG was recorded. Participants, regardless of literacy level, showed N400 effects yoked to the cloze probability of the targets, with larger N400 amplitudes for less expected than more expected words. However, literacy-related differences emerged in an earlier time window of 170-300 ms: higher literacy adults produced a reduced negativity for strongly predictable targets over anterior channels, similar to previously reported effects on the Phonological Mapping Negativity (PMN), whereas low-literacy adults did not. Collectively, these findings suggest that in auditory sentence processing literacy may not notably affect the incremental activation of semantic features, but that comprehenders with underdeveloped literacy skills may be less likely to engage predictive processing. Thus, basic mechanisms of comprehension may be recruited differently as a function of literacy development-even in spoken language.
我们研究了成年阅读困难者在理解口语时如何利用句子语境来促进单词处理,以及在哪些条件下,文字解码不会成为理解的障碍。刺激是强约束和弱约束的句子(以 cloze 概率衡量),这些句子以最符合约束条件的词或不符合约束但合理的词结尾。具有不同读写能力的社区居民在听连续语音时记录他们的 EEG。无论读写水平如何,参与者都表现出与 cloze 概率相关的 N400 效应,与更可预测的词相比,不太可预测的词产生更大的 N400 振幅。然而,在 170-300 毫秒的早期时间窗口中出现了与读写能力相关的差异:高读写能力的成年人在前额通道上对强可预测的目标产生了较小的负性,这与先前对语音映射负性(PMN)的报道相似,而低读写能力的成年人则没有。总的来说,这些发现表明,在听觉句子处理中,读写能力可能不会显著影响语义特征的递增激活,而读写能力较弱的理解者可能不太可能参与预测处理。因此,即使在口语中,阅读理解的基本机制也可能因读写能力的发展而不同。