• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仔细阅读,因为这很重要!价值驱动策略如何影响句子记忆。

Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 603 E Daniel St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01409-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-023-01409-3
PMID:37458967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10915884/
Abstract

Little is understood about how people strategically process and remember important but complex information, such as sentences. In the current study, we asked whether people can effectively prioritize memory for sentences as a function of their relative importance (operationalized as a reward point value) and whether they do so, in part, by changing their sentence processing strategies when value information is available in advance. We adapted the value-directed remembering paradigm (Castel, Psychol Learn Motiv 48:225-270, 2007) for sentences that varied in constraint and predictability. Each sentence was associated with a high or low value for subsequent free recall (whole sentence) and recognition (sentence-final words) tests. Value information appeared after or before each sentence as a between-subject manipulation. Regardless of condition, we observed that high-value sentences were recalled more often than low-value sentences, showing that people can strategically prioritize their encoding of sentences. However, memory patterns differed depending on when value information was available. Recall for high-value sentences that ended unexpectedly (and therefore violated one's predictions) was reduced in the Before compared to the After condition. Before condition participants also showed a greater tendency to false alarm to lures (words that were the predicted - but not obtained - ending) from strongly constraining sentences. These observations suggest that when people try to prioritize sentence-level information that they know is valuable, the reading strategies they employ may paradoxically lead to worse memory.

摘要

人们对于如何策略性地处理和记住重要但复杂的信息(例如句子)知之甚少。在当前的研究中,我们想知道人们是否可以根据句子的相对重要性(通过奖励点数值来操作)有效地优先考虑对句子的记忆,以及他们是否会在预先提供价值信息的情况下通过改变句子处理策略来实现这一点。我们改编了价值导向记忆范式(Castel,Psychol Learn Motiv 48:225-270,2007),用于处理约束性和可预测性不同的句子。每个句子都与后续自由回忆(整句)和识别(句子结尾单词)测试的高或低值相关联。价值信息作为被试间的操纵在每个句子之后或之前出现。无论条件如何,我们观察到高价值句子的回忆频率都高于低价值句子,这表明人们可以策略性地优先考虑对句子的编码。然而,记忆模式取决于价值信息何时可用。在 Before 条件下,出乎意料地结束的高价值句子(因此违反了人们的预测)的回忆减少了,而在 After 条件下则没有。在 Before 条件下的参与者对来自强约束句子的诱饵(即预测但未获得的结尾单词)也表现出更大的错误警报倾向。这些观察结果表明,当人们试图优先处理他们知道有价值的句子级信息时,他们所采用的阅读策略可能会导致记忆更差。

相似文献

1
Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.仔细阅读,因为这很重要!价值驱动策略如何影响句子记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01409-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.语言预测错误对下游识别记忆和句子回忆的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):1-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02078.
3
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.在同时进行的记忆和听觉感知任务中,瞳孔扩张反应对记忆负荷的敏感性高于对听觉刺激特征的敏感性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):272-286. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000612.
4
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.在语境中理解词汇:阅读过程中词汇与句子层面信息的交互作用。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022.
5
Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.外在认知负荷会影响高低预测度句子中的口语词汇识别。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):378-389. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493.
6
Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory.单词预测对识别记忆的下游行为和电生理后果
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;13:291. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
7
Benefits and costs of predictive processing: How sentential constraint and word expectedness affect memory formation.预测加工的收益和成本:句子约束和单词预期度如何影响记忆形成。
Brain Res. 2022 Aug 1;1788:147942. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.147942. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information.何时何地发生的?核心句和可选句信息回忆中的系统差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jan;77(1):111-132. doi: 10.1177/17470218231159190. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
9
Memory as assessed by recognition and reading time in normal and memory-impaired people with Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders.通过识别和阅读时间评估正常人群以及患有阿尔茨海默病和其他神经系统疾病的记忆受损人群的记忆情况。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Dec;115(4):331-47. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.115.4.331.
10
Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.自由回忆测试体验增强了价值对记忆的策略驱动效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1581-1601. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000395. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal stability of semantic predictions in subclinical autistic and schizotypal personality traits.亚临床自闭症和分裂型人格特质中语义预测的时间稳定性。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 19;11(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00643-9.
2
The effect of value on context and target recollection in memory for truth and falsity.价值对真假记忆中语境和目标回忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1451-1462. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01554-3. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-related Changes in the Structure and Dynamics of the Semantic Network.语义网络结构与动态的年龄相关变化。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(7):805-819. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.2019286. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
2
Strategic metacognition: Self-paced study time and responsible remembering.策略性元认知:自我调节的学习时间和负责任的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):234-251. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01307-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Memory and Reward-Based Learning: A Value-Directed Remembering Perspective.记忆和奖励学习:一种价值导向的记忆视角。
语言预测错误对下游识别记忆和句子回忆的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):1-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02078.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:25-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032921-050951. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.联系与思考:电生理学提供理解的洞见。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Jan;59(1):e13940. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13940. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
The role of attention and ageing in the retrieval dynamics of value-directed remembering.注意和年龄在价值导向记忆提取动态中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):954-968. doi: 10.1177/17470218211046612. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Rational Adaptation in Lexical Prediction: The Influence of Prediction Strength.词汇预测中的合理适应性:预测强度的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 14;12:622873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622873. eCollection 2021.
7
Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering.重要的元记忆:重要性判断可以激发负责任的记忆。
Memory. 2021 Mar;29(3):271-283. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1887895. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Value-directed memory effects on item and context memory.价值导向的记忆对项目和情境记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Aug;49(6):1082-1100. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01153-6. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.负责的记忆和遗忘是对重要信息记忆的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):895-911. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01139-4. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
10
Individual differences in value-directed remembering.价值导向记忆中的个体差异。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275. Epub 2020 May 5.