• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

睡眠障碍对驾驶安全的影响——来自第二战略公路研究计划自然驾驶研究的发现。

The impact of sleep disorders on driving safety-findings from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program naturalistic driving study.

机构信息

The Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy023.

DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsy023
PMID:29408974
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the association between driving safety and seven sleep disorders amongst 3541 participants of the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) naturalistic driving study.

METHODS

SHRP 2 collected naturalistic driving data from participants between 16 and 98 years old by instrumenting participants' vehicles. The analyses used logistic regression to determine the likelihood of crash or near-crash involvement, Poisson log-linear regression to assess crash or near-crash rate, and ordinal logistic regression to assess driver maneuver appropriateness and crash or near-crash severity. These analyses did not account for any medical treatments for the sleep disorders.

RESULTS

Females with restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED), drivers with insomnia or narcolepsy, are associated with significantly higher risk of crash or near-crash. Drivers with shift work sleep disorder (SWSD) are associated with significantly increased crash or near-crash rate. Females with RLS/WED or sleep apnea and drivers with SWSD are associated with less safe driver maneuver and drivers with periodic limb movement disorder are associated with more severe events. The four analyses provide no evidence of safety decrements associated with migraine.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first examination on the association between seven sleep disorders and different measures of driving risk using large-scale naturalistic driving study data. The results corroborate much of the existing simulator and epidemiological research related to sleep-disorder patients and their driving safety, but add ecological validity to those findings. These results contribute to the empirical basis for medical professionals, policy makers, and employers in making decisions to aid individuals with sleep disorders in balancing safety and personal mobility.

摘要

研究目的

本研究调查了在 SHRP2 自然驾驶研究的 3541 名参与者中,7 种睡眠障碍与驾驶安全之间的关系。

方法

SHRP2 通过对参与者的车辆进行仪器化,收集了 16 至 98 岁参与者的自然驾驶数据。分析使用逻辑回归来确定涉及碰撞或近碰撞的可能性,泊松对数线性回归来评估碰撞或近碰撞率,以及有序逻辑回归来评估驾驶员操纵的适当性和碰撞或近碰撞的严重程度。这些分析没有考虑任何针对睡眠障碍的治疗方法。

结果

患有不安腿综合征/Willis-Ekbom 病(RLS/WED)的女性、患有失眠或嗜睡症的驾驶员,与更高的碰撞或近碰撞风险显著相关。患有轮班工作睡眠障碍(SWSD)的驾驶员与更高的碰撞或近碰撞率显著相关。患有 RLS/WED 或睡眠呼吸暂停的女性和患有 SWSD 的驾驶员与更不安全的驾驶操作相关,而患有周期性肢体运动障碍的驾驶员与更严重的事件相关。这四项分析均未提供与偏头痛相关的安全下降的证据。

结论

本研究首次使用大规模自然驾驶研究数据,检查了 7 种睡眠障碍与不同驾驶风险测量之间的关系。结果证实了与睡眠障碍患者及其驾驶安全相关的大部分现有模拟器和流行病学研究,但为这些发现增加了生态有效性。这些结果为医疗专业人员、政策制定者和雇主在帮助睡眠障碍患者平衡安全和个人流动性方面做出决策提供了经验依据。

相似文献

1
The impact of sleep disorders on driving safety-findings from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program naturalistic driving study.睡眠障碍对驾驶安全的影响——来自第二战略公路研究计划自然驾驶研究的发现。
Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41(4). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy023.
2
Visual Sensory and Visual-Cognitive Function and Rate of Crash and Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data.利用自然驾驶数据评估老年驾驶员的视觉感官和视觉认知功能与撞车及险些撞车发生率的关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):2959-2967. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21482.
3
Exploring microscopic driving volatility in naturalistic driving environment prior to involvement in safety critical events-Concept of event-based driving volatility.在涉及安全关键事件之前,探索自然驾驶环境中的微观驾驶波动性——基于事件的驾驶波动性概念。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105277. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.利用SHRP2自然驾驶研究对青少年、年轻成年人和经验丰富的成年驾驶员中的险些相撞事故进行分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S89-S96. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1415433.
5
The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.日常使用手机和开车时使用手机与驾驶员层面碰撞风险的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level.利用自然驾驶数据探索驾驶员层面与交通安全相关事件和碰撞风险之间的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms, Sleepiness and Accidental Risk in 36140 Regularly Registered Highway Drivers.36140名定期注册的公路驾驶员的注意力缺陷多动障碍症状、嗜睡与意外风险
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0138004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138004. eCollection 2015.
8
Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据进行驾驶员个体风险评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
9
Driver behavior analysis on rural 2-lane, 2-way highways using SHRP 2 NDS data.利用SHRP 2 NDS数据对农村双车道双向公路上的驾驶员行为进行分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(8):838-843. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1524142. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.农村双车道公路水平曲线路段的碰撞和近碰撞事故:自然驾驶数据分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving Safety among Adolescents with Health Conditions: An Integrative Review.健康状况不佳的青少年的驾驶安全性:一项综合综述。
J Transp Health. 2025 Jun;42. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2025.102040. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Providing Buffers, Solving Barriers: Value-Driven Policies and Actions that Protect Clients Today and Increase the Chances of Thriving Tomorrow.提供缓冲,消除障碍:以价值为导向的政策与行动,既能保护当下的客户,又能增加未来蓬勃发展的机会。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Nov 20;18(2):390-409. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00876-z. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Protocol for a pilot hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation study to improve help-seeking for sleep disorders in the future healthcare workforce: The Sleep Check Before Shift Work trial.
一项针对未来医疗保健人员改善睡眠障碍求助行为的试点混合 I 型有效性-实施性研究方案:轮班工作前睡眠检查试验
Sleep Adv. 2025 Mar 26;6(2):zpaf020. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf020. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Driving among individuals with chronic conditions: A systematic review of applied research using kinematic driving sensors.驾驶慢性疾病患者:使用运动学驾驶传感器的应用研究系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Apr;72(4):1242-1251. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18738. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
5
Effects of solriamfetol on on-the-road driving in participants with narcolepsy: A randomised crossover trial.索里昂对发作性睡病患者道路驾驶的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2023 Jan;38(1):e2858. doi: 10.1002/hup.2858. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
A Deep Learning Approach to Classify Sitting and Sleep History from Raw Accelerometry Data during Simulated Driving.基于深度学习的模拟驾驶过程中原始加速度计数据的坐姿和睡眠历史分类方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;22(17):6598. doi: 10.3390/s22176598.
7
Correlations of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Daytime Sleepiness with the Risk of Car Accidents in Adult Working Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Gender-Based Approach.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征及日间嗜睡与成年工作人群交通事故风险的相关性:基于性别的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 8;11(14):3971. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143971.
8
Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?维持清醒测试中的微睡眠与睡眠起始潜伏期:哪一个是困倦的最佳指标?
Clocks Sleep. 2021 Apr 30;3(2):259-273. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep3020016.
9
A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging.穿戴式睡眠分期传感技术的系统评价
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;21(5):1562. doi: 10.3390/s21051562.
10
Do healthcare providers assess for risk factors and talk to patients about return to driving after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)? Findings from the 2020 DocStyles Survey.医护人员是否会评估轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后患者的风险因素并与其讨论恢复驾驶问题?来自 2020 年 DocStyles 调查的结果。
Inj Prev. 2021 Dec;27(6):560-566. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044034. Epub 2021 Jan 15.