Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Division, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information médicale Evaluation Recherche, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Laboratoire Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER) Lyon, France.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
Numerous randomized studies have shown that changing certain features of colonoscopes, usually incorporated when switching from one endoscope generation to the next, mostly do not increase adenoma yield. There is, however, indirect evidence that it may be necessary to skip one instrument generation (ie, changing from one generation to the next but one) to achieve this effect.
We compared the latest-generation colonoscopes from one company (Olympus Exera III, 190-C) with the next to last one (Olympus 160/5-C) in a prospective multicenter study randomized for the order of colonoscopes in a tandem fashion, involving 2 different examiners. Patients with increased risk for colorectal neoplasia undergoing colonoscopy (positive fecal occult blood test, personal/familial history of colorectal cancer/adenoma, rectal bleeding, recent change in bowel movements) were included. The primary outcome was the adenoma miss rate with the 190 (190-C) colonoscope in comparison with the 160/5 colonoscope (160/5-C).
A total of 856 patients (48.8% male; mean age, 58.3 years) with a personal (41%) or family (38%) history of colorectal neoplasia, rectal bleeding (19%), and other indications were included. Of the 429 patients in the 190-C first group, 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0%-20.1%) had at least one adenoma missed during the first procedure, compared with 30.2% (95% CI, 25.9%-34.6%) in the group with 160/5-C first (P < .001). Similarly, the adenoma detection rate during the first colonoscopy was 43.8% versus 36.5% (P = .030) for 190-C versus 160/5-C, respectively.
This randomized tandem trial showed lower adenoma miss rates and higher adenoma detection rates for the newer 190 colonoscopes compared with the 160/5 series. These results suggest that it takes multiple improvements, such as those implemented over 2 instrument generations, before an effect on adenoma (miss) rate can be observed. (Study registration number: ISRCTN 2010-A01256-33.).
大量随机研究表明,改变结肠镜的某些特征(通常在从一代内镜切换到下一代内镜时进行)通常不会增加腺瘤的检出率。然而,间接证据表明,可能需要跳过一代仪器(即从一代切换到下一代)才能达到这种效果。
我们在一项前瞻性多中心研究中比较了一家公司的最新一代结肠镜(奥林巴斯 Exera III,190-C)和上一代结肠镜(奥林巴斯 160/5-C),该研究采用串联式随机方式对结肠镜的顺序进行分组,涉及 2 名不同的检查者。纳入有结直肠肿瘤风险增加的患者(粪便潜血试验阳性、个人/家族结直肠癌/腺瘤史、直肠出血、近期排便习惯改变)。主要结局是 190 结肠镜(190-C)与 160/5 结肠镜(160/5-C)的腺瘤遗漏率。
共纳入 856 例有个人(41%)或家族(38%)结直肠肿瘤史、直肠出血(19%)和其他适应证的患者。在 190-C 组的 429 例患者中,第一程有 16.6%(95%置信区间[CI],13.0%-20.1%)至少遗漏一个腺瘤,而 160/5-C 组第一程有 30.2%(95% CI,25.9%-34.6%)(P<.001)。同样,第一程结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率分别为 43.8%和 36.5%(P=.030),190-C 组和 160/5-C 组。
这项随机串联试验显示,与 160/5 系列相比,新型 190 结肠镜的腺瘤遗漏率较低,腺瘤检出率较高。这些结果表明,在观察到腺瘤(遗漏)率的变化之前,需要进行多次改进,例如在两代仪器之间进行改进。(研究注册号:ISRCTN 2010-A01256-33。)