Suppr超能文献

重复机器人二尖瓣手术:一种安全有效的策略。

Repeat Robotic Endoscopic Mitral Valve Operation: A Safe and Effective Strategy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jun;105(6):1704-1709. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve reoperation is necessary in a finite percentage of patients. With growth in robotic mitral valve operations, reoperative strategies need to be developed. A review of institutional mitral valve reoperations after a previous robotic approach was undertaken.

METHODS

From January 2006 through April 2017, 1,853 patients underwent an initial robotic mitral valve operation by a dedicated robotic team. During this interval, 54 of these patients (2.9%) required mitral reoperation at our institution. The prospectively collected operative, echocardiographic, videoscopic, and outcome data for these patients were retrospectively reviewed to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a repeat robotic mitral valve operation.

RESULTS

Reoperative mitral operation after a previous robotic procedure was completed robotically in 50 patients (92.6%). Robotic mitral re-repair was achieved in 36 of the 50 patients (72%), including 33 of the 39 patients (85%) with degenerative disease. Conversion of a previous repair to a replacement was performed in 12 patients (24%) and re-replacement in 2 patients (4%). No patients were converted from a robotic approach to a thoracotomy or sternotomy approach. There were no deaths or strokes in this series. Major morbidity occurred in 1 patient (2%) in the repeat robotic group. Sternotomy for reoperation was required in 4 patients (7%) due to right chest access or peripheral perfusion limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat robotic mitral operation after a previous robotic approach is feasible and appears to be an effective and safe strategy in a high percentage of patients when performed by an experienced robotic team.

摘要

背景

二尖瓣再次手术在一定比例的患者中是必要的。随着机器人二尖瓣手术的发展,需要制定再次手术的策略。我们对先前机器人二尖瓣手术后的机构二尖瓣再次手术进行了回顾。

方法

从 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月,由一个专门的机器人团队对 1853 例患者进行了初次机器人二尖瓣手术。在此期间,我们机构有 54 例患者(2.9%)需要再次二尖瓣手术。对这些患者的前瞻性采集的手术、超声心动图、视频镜和结果数据进行了回顾性审查,以评估重复机器人二尖瓣手术的可行性、疗效和安全性。

结果

在先前的机器人手术后,50 例患者(92.6%)完成了机器人二尖瓣再次手术。在这 50 例患者中,有 36 例(72%)通过机器人二尖瓣再次修复实现了机器人二尖瓣再修复,其中 39 例患者中的 33 例(85%)为退行性疾病。12 例患者(24%)将先前的修复转换为替换,2 例患者(4%)进行了再次替换。在本系列中,没有患者从机器人手术转换为开胸手术或胸骨切开术。没有死亡或中风。在重复机器人组中,1 例患者(2%)发生了主要并发症。由于右侧胸部进入或外周灌注受限,有 4 例患者(7%)需要再次开胸手术。

结论

由经验丰富的机器人团队进行时,先前机器人二尖瓣手术后再次进行机器人二尖瓣手术是可行的,在大多数患者中似乎是一种有效且安全的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验