• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑网络结构中神经生理活动的能量景观。

The Energy Landscape of Neurophysiological Activity Implicit in Brain Network Structure.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20123-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20123-8
PMID:29410486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5802783/
Abstract

A critical mystery in neuroscience lies in determining how anatomical structure impacts the complex functional dynamics of the brain. How does large-scale brain circuitry constrain states of neuronal activity and transitions between those states? We address these questions using a maximum entropy model of brain dynamics informed by white matter tractography. We demonstrate that the most probable brain states - characterized by minimal energy - display common activation profiles across brain areas: local spatially-contiguous sets of brain regions reminiscent of cognitive systems are co-activated frequently. The predicted activation rate of these systems is highly correlated with the observed activation rate measured in a separate resting state fMRI data set, validating the utility of the maximum entropy model in describing neurophysiological dynamics. This approach also offers a formal notion of the energy of activity within a system, and the energy of activity shared between systems. We observe that within- and between-system energies cleanly separate cognitive systems into distinct categories, optimized for differential contributions to integrated versus segregated function. These results support the notion that energetic and structural constraints circumscribe brain dynamics, offering insights into the roles that cognitive systems play in driving whole-brain activation patterns.

摘要

神经科学中的一个关键难题在于确定解剖结构如何影响大脑的复杂功能动态。大规模的大脑回路如何限制神经元活动的状态和这些状态之间的转换?我们使用基于白质束追踪的大脑动力学最大熵模型来解决这些问题。我们证明,最可能的大脑状态 - 以最小能量为特征 - 在大脑区域之间显示出共同的激活模式:局部空间连续的一组大脑区域类似于认知系统经常被共同激活。这些系统的预测激活率与在单独的静息状态 fMRI 数据集测量的观察到的激活率高度相关,验证了最大熵模型在描述神经生理动力学方面的实用性。这种方法还提供了系统内活动能量和系统间活动能量的形式化概念。我们观察到,系统内和系统间的能量可以将认知系统清晰地分为不同的类别,为整合功能和分离功能的不同贡献进行了优化。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即能量和结构约束限制了大脑的动力学,为认知系统在驱动整个大脑激活模式中所起的作用提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/f3715587ecb4/41598_2018_20123_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/428cfe3688fb/41598_2018_20123_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/08d6ac380e81/41598_2018_20123_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/74bc8472c4e3/41598_2018_20123_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/1a5858cc0f97/41598_2018_20123_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/f3715587ecb4/41598_2018_20123_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/428cfe3688fb/41598_2018_20123_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/08d6ac380e81/41598_2018_20123_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/74bc8472c4e3/41598_2018_20123_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/1a5858cc0f97/41598_2018_20123_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c4/5802783/f3715587ecb4/41598_2018_20123_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Energy Landscape of Neurophysiological Activity Implicit in Brain Network Structure.大脑网络结构中神经生理活动的能量景观。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20123-8.
2
The energy landscape underpinning module dynamics in the human brain connectome.人类脑连接组中模块动态的能量景观基础。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:364-380. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
fMRI-guided white matter connectivity in fluid and crystallized cognitive abilities in healthy adults.健康成年人中 fMRI 引导的白质连接与流体和晶体认知能力的关系。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116809. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116809. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
Bayesian estimation of maximum entropy model for individualized energy landscape analysis of brain state dynamics.贝叶斯估计最大熵模型用于脑状态动力学个体化能量景观分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Aug 1;42(11):3411-3428. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25442. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
A neural network that links brain function, white-matter structure and risky behavior.一个连接大脑功能、白质结构和危险行为的神经网络。
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.058. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
6
Spectral mapping of brain functional connectivity from diffusion imaging.弥散成像脑功能连接的谱图分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):1411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18769-x.
7
Impairments of white matter tracts and connectivity alterations in five cognitive networks of patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者五个认知网络的白质束损伤和连接改变。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;201:106424. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106424. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
How do parcellation size and short-range connectivity affect dynamics in large-scale brain network models?分块大小和短程连接如何影响大规模脑网络模型中的动力学?
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:135-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
9
A pairwise maximum entropy model accurately describes resting-state human brain networks.一种成对最大熵模型准确地描述了静息状态下的人脑网络。
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1370. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2388.
10
Age-Related Changes in Frontal Network Structural and Functional Connectivity in Relation to Bimanual Movement Control.与双手运动控制相关的额叶网络结构和功能连接的年龄相关变化。
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 10;36(6):1808-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3355-15.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal asymmetries on brain energy landscape uncover system entrapment related to depression severity.大脑能量景观的时空不对称揭示了与抑郁严重程度相关的系统滞留。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 19:rs.3.rs-7312306. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7312306/v1.
2
A comprehensive analysis of nanomagnetism models for the evaluation of particle energy in magnetic hyperthermia.用于评估磁热疗中粒子能量的纳米磁性模型的综合分析。
Nanoscale Adv. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1039/d5na00258c.
3
Can a single brain cell be surprised?单个脑细胞会感到惊讶吗?

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment.神经发育过程中脑网络动力学的演变
Netw Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;1(1):14-30. doi: 10.1162/NETN_a_00001. eCollection 2017.
2
Autaptic Connections Shift Network Excitability and Bursting.轴突突触连接改变网络兴奋性和爆发。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:44006. doi: 10.1038/srep44006.
3
Optimal trajectories of brain state transitions.脑状态转换的最优轨迹。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 4;16(1):3178. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57975-4.
4
Entropy and Complexity Tools Across Scales in Neuroscience: A Review.神经科学中跨尺度的熵与复杂性工具:综述
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;27(2):115. doi: 10.3390/e27020115.
5
The brain selectively allocates energy to functional brain networks under cognitive control.大脑在认知控制下选择性地将能量分配到功能性脑网络。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):32032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83696-7.
6
Symmetry breaking organizes the brain's resting state manifold.对称性破缺组织大脑的静息态流形。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31970. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83542-w.
7
The alterations of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the energy landscape of resting-state networks differ across the human cortex.重复经颅磁刺激对静息态网络能量景观的改变在人类大脑皮层中是不同的。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Oct 15;45(15):e70029. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70029.
8
Power and reproducibility in the external validation of brain-phenotype predictions.脑表型预测的外部验证中的效能和可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):2018-2033. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01931-7. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
9
A Dynamic Entropy Approach Reveals Reduced Functional Network Connectivity Trajectory Complexity in Schizophrenia.一种动态熵方法揭示了精神分裂症中功能网络连接轨迹复杂性的降低。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;26(7):545. doi: 10.3390/e26070545.
10
Re-awakening the brain: Forcing transitions in disorders of consciousness by external in silico perturbation.唤醒大脑:通过外部计算机模拟扰动促使意识障碍发生转变。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 3;20(5):e1011350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011350. eCollection 2024 May.
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Small-World Brain Networks Revisited.再次探讨小世界脑网络。
Neuroscientist. 2017 Oct;23(5):499-516. doi: 10.1177/1073858416667720. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks.基于刺激的动态脑网络控制
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Sep 9;12(9):e1005076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005076. eCollection 2016 Sep.
6
Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology.优化控制人类连接组:网络拓扑结构的作用。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 29;6:30770. doi: 10.1038/srep30770.
7
Structure and inference in annotated networks.带注释网络中的结构和推理。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 16;7:11863. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11863.
8
New Perspectives on Spontaneous Brain Activity: Dynamic Networks and Energy Matter.自发性脑活动的新视角:动态网络与能量问题
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 26;10:247. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00247. eCollection 2016.
9
Two's company, three (or more) is a simplex : Algebraic-topological tools for understanding higher-order structure in neural data.二人成伴,三人(或更多人)则为简单形:用于理解神经数据中高阶结构的代数拓扑工具。
J Comput Neurosci. 2016 Aug;41(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10827-016-0608-6. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
10
Building a minimum frustration framework for brain functions over long time scales.构建长期时间尺度上大脑功能的最小挫折框架。
J Neurosci Res. 2016 Aug;94(8):702-16. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23748. Epub 2016 Apr 26.