• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验单样本 Q 球成像中偏差和方差的量化。

Empirical single sample quantification of bias and variance in Q-ball imaging.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1666-1675. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27115. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.27115
PMID:29411435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6078828/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The bias and variance of high angular resolution diffusion imaging methods have not been thoroughly explored in the literature and may benefit from the simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) and bootstrap techniques to estimate bias and variance of high angular resolution diffusion imaging metrics.

METHODS

The SIMEX approach is well established in the statistics literature and uses simulation of increasingly noisy data to extrapolate back to a hypothetical case with no noise. The bias of calculated metrics can then be computed by subtracting the SIMEX estimate from the original pointwise measurement. The SIMEX technique has been studied in the context of diffusion imaging to accurately capture the bias in fractional anisotropy measurements in DTI. Herein, we extend the application of SIMEX and bootstrap approaches to characterize bias and variance in metrics obtained from a Q-ball imaging reconstruction of high angular resolution diffusion imaging data.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate that SIMEX and bootstrap approaches provide consistent estimates of the bias and variance of generalized fractional anisotropy, respectively. The RMSE for the generalized fractional anisotropy estimates shows a 7% decrease in white matter and an 8% decrease in gray matter when compared with the observed generalized fractional anisotropy estimates. On average, the bootstrap technique results in SD estimates that are approximately 97% of the true variation in white matter, and 86% in gray matter.

CONCLUSION

Both SIMEX and bootstrap methods are flexible, estimate population characteristics based on single scans, and may be extended for bias and variance estimation on a variety of high angular resolution diffusion imaging metrics.

摘要

目的

高角分辨率扩散成像方法的偏差和方差在文献中尚未得到彻底探讨,可能受益于模拟外推(SIMEX)和自举技术来估计高角分辨率扩散成像指标的偏差和方差。

方法

SIMEX 方法在统计学文献中已经得到很好的建立,它使用模拟越来越嘈杂的数据来外推回一个假设的无噪声情况。然后可以通过从原始逐点测量值中减去 SIMEX 估计值来计算计算指标的偏差。SIMEX 技术已在扩散成像的背景下进行了研究,以准确捕获 DTI 中分数各向异性测量值的偏差。在此,我们扩展了 SIMEX 和自举方法的应用,以表征高角分辨率扩散成像数据的 Q 球成像重建中获得的指标的偏差和方差。

结果

结果表明,SIMEX 和自举方法分别为广义分数各向异性的偏差和方差提供了一致的估计。与观察到的广义分数各向异性估计相比,广义分数各向异性估计的 RMSE 在白质中降低了 7%,在灰质中降低了 8%。平均而言,自举技术的 SD 估计值在白质中约为真实变异性的 97%,在灰质中约为 86%。

结论

SIMEX 和自举方法都很灵活,基于单次扫描估计总体特征,并且可以扩展用于各种高角分辨率扩散成像指标的偏差和方差估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/bd534aa8ccf7/nihms934053f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/ac7134129172/nihms934053f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/e223e967724e/nihms934053f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/2ff4ce10afa0/nihms934053f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/a91cdec2512e/nihms934053f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/26071c8dbb9c/nihms934053f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/bd534aa8ccf7/nihms934053f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/ac7134129172/nihms934053f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/e223e967724e/nihms934053f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/2ff4ce10afa0/nihms934053f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/a91cdec2512e/nihms934053f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/26071c8dbb9c/nihms934053f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96e/6078828/bd534aa8ccf7/nihms934053f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Empirical single sample quantification of bias and variance in Q-ball imaging.经验单样本 Q 球成像中偏差和方差的量化。
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1666-1675. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27115. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
A deep learning approach to estimation of subject-level bias and variance in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.一种用于估计高角分辨率扩散成像中个体水平偏差和方差的深度学习方法。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;59:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
3
Q-ball imaging models: comparison between high and low angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI protocols for investigation of brain white matter integrity.Q球成像模型:用于研究脑白质完整性的高、低角分辨率扩散加权磁共振成像协议之间的比较
Neuroradiology. 2016 Feb;58(2):209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1616-3. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Evaluation of inter-site bias and variance in diffusion-weighted MRI.扩散加权磁共振成像中不同站点间偏差和方差的评估。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2018 Mar;10574. doi: 10.1117/12.2293735.
5
Assessment of bias for MRI diffusion tensor imaging using SIMEX.使用SIMEX对MRI扩散张量成像的偏倚评估。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_14.
6
Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.基于 SIMEX 评估实验测量扩散张量成像参数中的偏倚。
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Mar 1;69(3):891-902. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24324. Epub 2012 May 18.
7
Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.基于高斯扩散张量成像和非高斯扩散峰度成像模型的人脑扩散张量不变量估计差异。
Med Phys. 2016 May;43(5):2464. doi: 10.1118/1.4946819.
8
Identifying preoperative language tracts and predicting postoperative functional recovery using HARDI q-ball fiber tractography in patients with gliomas.使用 HARDI q-ball 纤维束示踪技术在胶质瘤患者中识别术前语言束并预测术后功能恢复。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;125(1):33-45. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS142203. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
9
Advantages of QBI in TBSS analyses.QBI 在 TBSS 分析中的优势。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Feb;32(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
10
A localized Richardson-Lucy algorithm for fiber orientation estimation in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.一种用于高角分辨率扩散成像中纤维方向估计的局部理查森- Lucy算法。
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2524-39. doi: 10.1118/1.4917082.

引用本文的文献

1
A deep learning approach to estimation of subject-level bias and variance in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.一种用于估计高角分辨率扩散成像中个体水平偏差和方差的深度学习方法。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;59:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
2
Evaluation of inter-site bias and variance in diffusion-weighted MRI.扩散加权磁共振成像中不同站点间偏差和方差的评估。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2018 Mar;10574. doi: 10.1117/12.2293735.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography.基于弥散张量成像的人类连接组图谱绘制挑战。
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x.
2
Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models.分析扩散磁共振成像模型中噪声、DWI 采样和假定参数值的影响。
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Nov;78(5):1767-1780. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26575. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.
基于 SIMEX 评估实验测量扩散张量成像参数中的偏倚。
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Mar 1;69(3):891-902. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24324. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Assessment of bias for MRI diffusion tensor imaging using SIMEX.使用SIMEX对MRI扩散张量成像的偏倚评估。
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_14.
5
Tractography gone wild: probabilistic fibre tracking using the wild bootstrap with diffusion tensor MRI.疯狂的纤维束成像:利用野生自助法结合扩散张量磁共振成像进行概率性纤维追踪
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Sep;27(9):1268-74. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.922191.
6
Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q-ball imaging.正则化、快速且稳健的解析Q球成像。
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Sep;58(3):497-510. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21277.
7
Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5 T.信噪比对于1.5T下扩散张量成像衍生的分数各向异性、平均扩散率和主特征向量测量的准确性及可重复性的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):756-67. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21053.
8
Using the wild bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in diffusion tensor imaging.利用野生自助法量化扩散张量成像中的不确定性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Mar;29(3):346-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20395.
9
Variance of estimated DTI-derived parameters via first-order perturbation methods.通过一阶微扰法估计扩散张量成像衍生参数的方差。
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Jan;57(1):141-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21111.
10
Q-ball reconstruction of multimodal fiber orientations using the spherical harmonic basis.使用球谐基对多模态纤维取向进行Q球重建。
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Jul;56(1):104-17. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20931.