Paquin Hugo, Bank Ilana, Young Meredith, Nguyen Lily H P, Fisher Rachel, Nugus Peter
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal , Montréal, Canada.
Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Centre for Medical Education, McGill University , Montréal, Canada.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2018 Feb 5;31(1):110-128. doi: 10.1108/LHS-02-2017-0010. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
Purpose Complex clinical situations, involving multiple medical specialists, create potential for tension or lack of clarity over leadership roles and may result in miscommunication, errors and poor patient outcomes. Even though copresence has been shown to overcome some differences among team members, the coordination literature provides little guidance on the relationship between coordination and leadership in highly specialized health settings. The purpose of this paper is to determine how different specialties involved in critical medical situations perceive the role of a leader and its contribution to effective crisis management, to better define leadership and improve interdisciplinary leadership and education. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative study was conducted featuring purposively sampled, semi-structured interviews with 27 physicians, from three different specialties involved in crisis resource management in pediatric centers across Canada: Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Otolaryngology and Anesthesia. A total of three researchers independently organized participant responses into categories. The categories were further refined into conceptual themes through iterative negotiation among the researchers. Findings Relatively "structured" (predictable) cases were amenable to concrete distributed leadership - the performance by micro-teams of specialized tasks with relative independence from each other. In contrast, relatively "unstructured" (unpredictable) cases required higher-level coordinative leadership - the overall management of the context and allocations of priorities by a designated individual. Originality/value Crisis medicine relies on designated leadership over highly differentiated personnel and unpredictable events. This challenges the notion of organic coordination and upholds the validity of a concept of leadership for crisis medicine that is not reducible to simple coordination. The intersection of predictability of cases with types of leadership can be incorporated into medical simulation training to develop non-technical skills crisis management and adaptive leaderships skills.
目的 复杂的临床情况涉及多个医学专科,这可能导致在领导角色方面出现紧张或职责不明确的情况,并可能导致沟通不畅、错误以及患者预后不佳。尽管已证明共处能够克服团队成员之间的一些差异,但关于高度专业化医疗环境中协调与领导之间的关系,协调文献几乎没有提供指导。本文的目的是确定参与危急医疗情况的不同专科如何看待领导者的角色及其对有效危机管理的贡献,以便更好地界定领导力并改善跨学科领导力及教育。
设计/方法/途径 进行了一项定性研究,对来自加拿大儿科中心参与危机资源管理的三个不同专科的27名医生进行了有目的抽样的半结构化访谈,这三个专科分别是儿科急诊医学、耳鼻喉科和麻醉科。共有三名研究人员独立地将参与者的回答进行分类。通过研究人员之间的反复协商,这些类别被进一步提炼为概念主题。
发现 相对“结构化”(可预测)的病例适合具体的分布式领导——由微型团队相对独立地执行专门任务。相比之下,相对“非结构化”(不可预测)的病例需要更高级别的协调领导——由指定人员对整体情况进行管理并分配优先级。
原创性/价值 危机医学依赖于对高度分化的人员和不可预测事件的指定领导。这对有机协调的概念提出了挑战,并支持了危机医学领导力概念的有效性,这种领导力不能简单归结为协调。病例的可预测性与领导类型的交叉点可纳入医学模拟培训,以培养危机管理的非技术技能和适应性领导技能。