• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专家意见必不可少:德尔菲-panel 方法有助于达成共识的科学方法。

Expert Opinion Is Necessary: Delphi Panel Methodology Facilitates a Scientific Approach to Consensus.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):349-351. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.022
PMID:29413182
Abstract

Our current trend and focus on evidence-based medicine is biased in favor of randomized controlled trials, which are ranked highest in the hierarchy of evidence while devaluing expert opinion, which is ranked lowest in the hierarchy. However, randomized controlled trials have weaknesses as well as strengths, and no research method is flawless. Moreover, stringent application of scientific research techniques, such as the Delphi Panel methodology, allows survey of experts in a high quality and scientific manner. Level V evidence (expert opinion) remains a necessary component in the armamentarium used to determine the answer to a clinical question.

摘要

我们目前对循证医学的趋势和关注存在偏向,偏向于随机对照试验,这种研究方法在证据层级中排名最高,而贬低了专家意见,后者在证据层级中排名最低。然而,随机对照试验也有其弱点和优势,没有一种研究方法是完美的。此外,严格应用科学研究技术,如德尔菲小组方法,可以以高质量和科学的方式调查专家。五级证据(专家意见)仍然是确定临床问题答案的武器库中不可或缺的组成部分。

相似文献

1
Expert Opinion Is Necessary: Delphi Panel Methodology Facilitates a Scientific Approach to Consensus.专家意见必不可少:德尔菲-panel 方法有助于达成共识的科学方法。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):349-351. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.022.
2
Research Pearls: Expert Consensus Based Evidence Using the Delphi Method.研究亮点:基于德尔菲法的专家共识证据。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3278-3282. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.004.
3
Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: a systematic literature review.德尔菲法、非随机化德尔菲法、RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和一种新的共识测量群体意识和共识方法:系统文献回顾。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov;36(11):1873-1887. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1816946. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Editorial Commentary: Wider Acceptance of Medical Expert Consensus Research Requires Strict Adherence to Delphi Panel Methodology.社论评论:要使医学专家共识研究得到更广泛的认可,就必须严格遵循德尔菲小组方法论。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):250-252. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.014.
5
Establishing an expert opinion framework for lung volume reduction in Ireland: a Delphi consensus technique.建立爱尔兰肺减容术的专家意见框架:德尔菲共识技术。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):843-849. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03467-7. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?社论评论:为了正确应用 Delphi 共识结论,需要考虑该过程的优势和劣势:是统一的专家意见还是导致奇异恍惚的有毒烟雾?
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027.
7
Use of cultural consensus analysis to evaluate expert feedback of median safety.运用文化共识分析来评估中位数安全性的专家反馈。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1458-67. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
8
Expert consensus document: Semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer - results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure.专家共识文件:局部前列腺癌主动监测中的语义学——改良 Delphi 共识程序的结果。
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 May;14(5):312-322. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.26. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
The American Venous Forum, American Vein and Lymphatic Society and the Society for Vascular Medicine expert opinion consensus on lymphedema diagnosis and treatment.美国静脉论坛、美国静脉和淋巴学会以及血管医学学会关于淋巴水肿诊断和治疗的专家共识。
Phlebology. 2022 May;37(4):252-266. doi: 10.1177/02683555211053532. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
[Meetings of the Psoriasis Experts: recommendations for daily practice].[银屑病专家会议:日常实践建议]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Feb;138(2 Suppl 1):H8-10. doi: 10.1016/S0151-9638(11)70056-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Spanish consensus of occupational therapists on upper limb assessment tools in stroke.西班牙职业治疗师关于中风上肢评估工具的共识
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep;86(9):648-658. doi: 10.1177/03080226231175574. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Developing and standardizing a tool to assess the health education needs of diabetic patients at Jazan Armed Forces Hospital.开发并标准化一种工具,以评估吉赞武装部队医院糖尿病患者的健康教育需求。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;100(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s42506-025-00183-1.
3
Why is it so difficult to understand why we don't understand human systemic lupus erythematosus? Contemplating facts, conflicts, and impact of "the causality cascade paradigm".
为什么理解我们为何不了解人类系统性红斑狼疮如此困难?思考“因果关系级联范式”的事实、冲突及影响。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 28;15:1507792. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1507792. eCollection 2024.
4
Construction on training course and training quality evaluation index system of chronic disease medication therapy management service (MTMs) in China: A Delphi study.中国慢性病药物治疗管理服务(MTMs)培训课程与培训质量评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0318446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318446. eCollection 2025.
5
Development, implementation and evaluation an empowerment program for adolescent girls with substance use disorders: Protocol for a mixed methods study.为患有物质使用障碍的少女制定、实施和评估一项赋权计划:一项混合方法研究的方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Nov 29;13:426. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1250_23. eCollection 2024.
6
Development of the West China Tinnitus Impact Inventory and Analysis of Its Reliability and Validity.《华西耳鸣影响量表的编制及其信效度分析》
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):401-407. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001590. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
7
Substantial variability in what is considered important in the radiological report for anterior shoulder instability: a Delphi study with Dutch musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.关于前肩不稳的放射学报告中重要内容的显著变异性:一项针对荷兰肌肉骨骼放射科医生和骨科医生的德尔菲研究。
JSES Int. 2024 Apr 8;8(4):746-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.012. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Designing a core data set for benign hysterectomy registration system and its implementation in a referral teaching hospital in Northwest Iran.设计良性子宫切除术登记系统的核心数据集及其在伊朗西北部一家转诊教学医院的实施。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06656-z.
9
European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (SECEC) rotator cuff tear registry Delphi consensus.欧洲肩肘外科学会(SECEC)肩袖撕裂登记处德尔菲共识
JSES Int. 2024 Feb 20;8(3):478-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.015. eCollection 2024 May.
10
The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE.对医学科学的最大贡献是从研究症状转向研究病因——罗伯特·科赫和路易斯·巴斯德的不懈遗产——以及一种因果关系的观点来接近 SLE 的定义。
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 1;15:1346619. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1346619. eCollection 2024.