• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社论评论:为了正确应用 Delphi 共识结论,需要考虑该过程的优势和劣势:是统一的专家意见还是导致奇异恍惚的有毒烟雾?

Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?

机构信息

The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027
PMID:35123706
Abstract

The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.

摘要

德尔菲共识过程是一种将不同专家意见整合起来以更好地理解复杂问题的工具。该过程最近已应用于骨科治疗选择。虽然这是解决问题的一部分,但必须了解该过程的优缺点,以便矫形外科医生能够有效地应用德尔菲共识过程的结论。重要的是要认识到,专家意见一次又一次地被精心收集的临床结果数据所颠覆。目前尚不清楚Oracle 的远见是出于智慧还是有毒烟雾导致的奇怪恍惚。

相似文献

1
Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?社论评论:为了正确应用 Delphi 共识结论,需要考虑该过程的优势和劣势:是统一的专家意见还是导致奇异恍惚的有毒烟雾?
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027.
2
Expert Opinion Is Necessary: Delphi Panel Methodology Facilitates a Scientific Approach to Consensus.专家意见必不可少:德尔菲-panel 方法有助于达成共识的科学方法。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):349-351. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.022.
3
The Delphi process in dental research.牙科研究中的德尔菲法。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008 Dec;8(4):211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.002.
4
Funnel plots and choropleth maps in cancer risk communication: a Delphi study.癌症风险沟通中的漏斗图和分级统计图:一项德尔菲研究。
Ann Ig. 2019 May-Jun;31(3):244-251. doi: 10.7416/ai.2019.2287.
5
Establishing an expert opinion framework for lung volume reduction in Ireland: a Delphi consensus technique.建立爱尔兰肺减容术的专家意见框架:德尔菲共识技术。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):843-849. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03467-7. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
Reporting Guidelines for the Use of Expert Judgement in Model-Based Economic Evaluations.基于模型的经济评估中专家判断使用的报告指南。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Nov;34(11):1161-1172. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0425-9.
7
Editorial Commentary: Wider Acceptance of Medical Expert Consensus Research Requires Strict Adherence to Delphi Panel Methodology.社论评论:要使医学专家共识研究得到更广泛的认可,就必须严格遵循德尔菲小组方法论。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):250-252. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.014.
8
Defining major trauma: a Delphi study.定义严重创伤:德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 May 10;29(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00870-w.
9
Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: a systematic literature review.德尔菲法、非随机化德尔菲法、RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和一种新的共识测量群体意识和共识方法:系统文献回顾。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov;36(11):1873-1887. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1816946. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Medicine authentication technology as a counterfeit medicine-detection tool: a Delphi method study to establish expert opinion on manual medicine authentication technology in secondary care.药品鉴定技术作为一种假药检测工具:一项德尔菲法研究,旨在就二级医疗中的手工药品鉴定技术确立专家意见。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 6;7(5):e013838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013838.